UK - Lucy Letby Trial - Media, Maps & Timeline *NO DISCUSSION*

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

Episode 57, Toxic Culture​




In this episode Caroline and Liz speak to Dr John Gibbs, one of the consultants who repeatedly tried to blow the whistle on Lucy Letby. He speaks of his regret that hospital managers didn’t listen or go to police sooner.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IDK
 
CHILD serial killer Lucy Letby has formally lodged a bid to challenge her conviction at the Court of Appeal, officials have confirmed.

Court staff said on Friday, September 15, that they had received an application for permission to appeal.

 
The Mail podcast from 10th July 2023, which I've now transcribed. It contains material about defence expert witnesses not included in any other media articles, in the judge's summing up before the jury retired to deliberate.


Episode 45, The jury retires​


In this episode Caroline and Liz explain that the jury has now been sent out to consider their verdicts. They were asked to begin their deliberations after listening to the judge sum up the case for more than four days.


Transcript

"The prosecution and defence have finished outlining their cases and the jury have now been asked to decide whether Lucy Letby is guilty or not guilty of the 22 charges that she faces. I’m Liz Hull, northern correspondent for the Mail. I will be in court to report on the case as it develops. And I’m Caroline Cheetham, a broadcast journalist. Every week we’ll examine what’s happened and bring you the details behind the headlines. This is The Trial of Lucy Letby.

LH: So all the evidence in the case has now been heard by the jury. The prosecution and the defence have outlined their cases and we’re now approaching the end of this trial. [explanation given re. anonymity of babies] In this episode we’ll hear the judge, Mr Justice Goss, send the jury out to begin their deliberations.

CC: We’ll bring you his summing up of all the evidence they’ve heard over the past 145 days.

LH: We’ll outline his reminder that although experts were instructed for both the prosecution and the defence, only the prosecution called their experts to give evidence.

CC: And we’ll explain that he urged the jury to make their decisions on the facts and to try to disregard the emotion and personal loss involved in the case.

LH: Welcome to episode 45, The jury retires.

CC: So we’ve reached a really important stage in the case Liz, because today, in fact just a few hours ago, the jury was finally sent out to deliberate on their verdicts, over nine months after they were sworn in.

LH: Yes last week the eight women and four men of the jury listened intently as the judge, Mr Justice Goss, summarised all the evidence they’ve heard from the prosecution and the defence, since this all began last October.

CC: We said a couple of weeks ago but it’s worth mentioning again, this trial has now been sitting through every season and today was the day that everyone’s been working towards for so long. The day the judge sent the jury out to consider the fundamental issue in the case, whether Lucy Letby, a neonatal nurse at the Countess of Chester Hospital, is guilty or innocent of murdering and attempting to murder babies in her care.

LH: And now all everyone else, that’s the barristers and lawyers, police officers, us and all the other journalists, the mums and dads of the babies and Lucy Letby herself, can do is wait. Wait until they reach a decision on each of the 22 charges she faces.

CC: So let’s go back to what the judge, Mr Justice Goss, told the jury before he sent them out. Now he explained that he was going to remind them of what they’d heard from all of the witnesses who came to court to give evidence over the past nine months.

LH: While the prosecution speech from Nick Johnson KC a couple of weeks ago explained why they say Lucy Letby is guilty and Ben Myers KC’s speech examined the opposite, that’s why he says she’s innocent, the summary from the judge is designed to provide them with a more balanced narrative, based on the evidence they’ve heard of what happened on the neonatal unit of the Countess of Chester Hospital.

CC: So Mr Justice Goss went back to the beginning by giving them a bit of background and context to the case. He explained that it had all been prompted by a significant rise in the numbers of babies suffering serious and unexpected collapses in the hospital’s neonatal unit in 2015 and 2016.

Judge: The prosecution case is that those collapses were not natural events, but were caused by the defendant Lucy Letby using various means to harm babies, intending they should die. Some died, others were resuscitated or in the case of alleged poisoning by insulin, the source was removed. A number of babies were subjected, the prosecution say, to repeated attempts to kill them. After a year it became clear that, of all the nursing staff and doctors, the defendant and her alone was at work in the unit at relevant times and was sometimes present when unexpected collapses occurred.

LH: The judge said his summing up would not be exhaustive and told the jury it was up to them to decide which were the most relevant and important pieces of evidence when they made their decisions.

CC: And he began by reminding them of some of the detail relating to the neonatal unit and what was going on there at the time they’re concerned with. He said back then the unit was a level 2 centre capable of taking babies born after 27 weeks.

Judge: up to 2015 the number of deaths on the unit was within the expected number of a unit of its type in the region, which was less than the national average. In 2015 and 2016 the numbers of deaths increased significantly with a marked difference both in the number of deaths and the unusual and unexpected nature of the deaths. The defence contend that this was a consequence of the increased number of neonatal babies being admitted at that time and the higher acuity of those babies. As the number of cases increased the consultants began to “think the unthinkable” as it was described – that these were not naturally occurring sudden collapses but the consequence of deliberate harmful acts.

LH: The judge reminded the jury that Lucy Letby was asked about her relationship with other members of staff who worked on the unit. She confirmed that apart from one of the female consultants who we can’t name for legal reasons but we’ve been calling doctor B, who she didn’t have the best working relationship with, she’d had no problem with any of the doctors and had a normal working relationship with them all.

Judge: ...she loved doctor A as a friend, but was not ‘in love’ with him. Later she characterised Dr Stephen Brearey as a *advertiser censored*. After investigations began she said he was one of four consultants, the others being Dr Ravi Jayaram, Dr Gibbs and Dr B, who conspired together to apportion blame on her, she believed to cover the failings of the hospital.

LH: There were seven consultants who worked on the neonatal unit and the children’s ward next door, the judge said. Nurses on the unit were qualified in three different bands. Band 6 were the highest qualified followed by band 5 nurses who were split between those who were qualified to care for intensive care babies and those who were not, and band 4 nurses commonly known as nursery nurses who mainly looked after the special care babies.

CC: he reminded the jury that several nurses had given evidence that the unit was sometimes short-staffed and on occasion they weren’t able to provide one-to-one care to intensive care babies which was in breach of recognised guidelines.

LH: But, the judge said, doctors had refuted any suggestion that staffing levels had compromised the care of any child. And a review carried out by the RCPCH had subsequently found staffing levels were better at the Countess than in all other district hospitals in the Cheshire Mersey area.

Judge: these units did not have the same mortality problems as the Countess of Chester.

LH: he told the jury it was up to them to decide the relevance of the staffing issues.

Judge: there is evidence of occasions when, contrary to standards, a nurse on shift was the designated nurse for more than one intensive care baby. There was also occasions when the nursing staff complained about the shift and when care was not as good as it should have been. Of potential relevance is whether any specific or identified failings by any of the clinicians and nursing practitioners was or may have been relevant to any deterioration of babies or any event you are considering. In particular whether a failure of care or mistake was causative to a sudden deterioration of any baby in the case or adversely affected their chances of recovery.

CC: the judge then summarised the prosecution and defence’s position on the two babies, baby F and baby L, who were poisoned with insulin.

Judge: in the case of two babies there is evidence of unprescribed insulin having been administered when it was wholly inappropriate. They are baby F and baby L each of whom was a twin. In their cases the prosecution invite you to conclude that there can be no doubt that someone intentionally added insulin to nutritional feed and dextrose, that being given to baby F and baby L respectively. And the chances of there being more than one person acting in that way can be entirely discounted. Medical negligence or accident cannot have played any part in these cases, they submit. The defence invite you to question the evidence of the taking of blood samples, and the potential consequences of insulin poisoning and the lack of harm caused. The prosecution say this evidence is of major significance being incontrovertible evidence that someone was deliberately and knowingly doing something completely contrary to normal practice. They say it was very dangerous and must have been done with the intent of endangering the lives of the children. They say this assists and informs you in the cases of the other children who suffered sudden and unexplained collapses from which there was no apparent medical explanation.

LH: the judge said it was the defence case that Lucy Letby was a dedicated, caring and conscientious nurse who never did anything to harm any child.

Judge: …babies do collapse for no apparent reason and there are potential medical reasons for at least some of the collapses. If there was someone intent on harming children it was not her.

CC: he explained that Lucy Letby had no previous convictions and had never been in trouble with the police before her arrest in July 2018.

LH: he explained she’d always wanted to work with children and selected her A levels so she could study for a degree in nursing. She undertook two work placements at the Countess in 2010 and 2011 while at Chester University, and started work as a band 5 nurse at the Countess in January 2012. Initially she started working with special care babies in nurseries 3 and 4 the judge said but she always strived to go on every course, and in March or April 2015 she completed a six-month course which involved a placement at the Liverpool Women’s hospital that allowed her to care for the sickest babies on the unit.

Judge: the defendant said that over a 12-month period she cared for hundreds of babies and she never did anything that was meant to hurt any of them. She only ever did her best to care for them. Hurting a baby was completely against everything being a nurse is. She was there to help and to care, not to harm.

LH: the judge reminded the jury that they’d heard from seven expert witnesses for the prosecution including the two paediatricians Dr Dewi Evans and Dr Sandie Bohin.

CC: he also said that although medical experts had been instructed by the defence only experts for the prosecution had given evidence.

Judge: although you know that experts were instructed on behalf of the defence and there were meetings between experts the only witnesses from whom you have heard were called by the prosecution. As with any witness it is for you to decide whether you accept some or all of the evidence of an expert witness. It is your view as to the significance and reliability of this evidence that is important.

LH: the judge also urged the jury to make their decisions on the facts and to try to disregard emotion and the personal trauma and loss involved in the case.

CC: he then focused his attention on each of the babies and the charges relating to them in the case, recapping what each witness has said when they were called to give evidence about them.

LH: we’ve heard much of this evidence over the course of our previous 44 episodes so we aren’t going to repeat it here again. But explaining what happened to each child took Mr Justice Goss the best part of four days.

LH: finally at two minutes past one, the two jury bailiffs who look after the jury while they are deliberating were officially sworn in and the judge sent the eight women and four men out into their retirement room to begin their deliberations.

Judge: how you conduct your deliberations is entirely a matter for you. You should of course respect each other’s opinions and value different viewpoints. Everyone should have a chance to speak. You should listen to one another and no one should feel pressure. You are under no pressure of time. Do not make your own enquiries about the case or talk or communicate with anyone in any way except when you are all together as a group of twelve. When you reach your verdicts your foreman should inform the jury bailiff and you will be called back in to court. The clerk of the court will ask the foreman to stand and they will be asked on each count whether you have reached a verdict and then whether you find the defendant guilty or not guilty. That completes my directions and I ask you now to retire and commence your deliberations."
 
[...]

The 33-year-old – who was last month sentenced to a whole life order for murdering seven babies and attempting to murder six others – is expected to start her bid to clear her name at a court hearing later this month.

But any full consideration of her appeal is unlikely to take place for several months. [...]

One father, whose baby Letby tried to murder, told the Mail: 'I'm disgusted and angry that Letby is appealing.

'As if we haven't been through enough. We are trying to rebuild our lives and now this, it's a joke of a system. I don't understand on what grounds she can appeal - there were no mitigating factors in the trial.'

[...]

Anyone convicted of a crime has 28 days to ask for permission to appeal – the 28-day period from the last verdicts in Letby's trial would have elapsed today.

A judge will now look at Letby's application and decide whether to give permission for it to go to appeal.

Should permission be given, the appeal would be heard by three senior judges.

If her application for permission to appeal is rejected, Letby can still renew her application before a panel of two or three judges.

[...]

The Judicial Office said it had received an application from her legal team.

'I can confirm that an application for leave to appeal against conviction has been received in the case of Lucy Letby,' a spokesman said.

Letby's solicitor, Richard Thomas, declined to comment today.

[...]

The Criminal Appeal Office said it could not give any information about the grounds for appeal. No court hearing has yet been formally listed, the Judicial Office said.

[...]


 
1695368246362.png1695368258111.png

[...] The woman fears her daughter - who was born prematurely in September 2014 - may have been left brain damaged by Letby, and is calling for police to investigate. [...]

The mum revealed that a day after Letby left the note, her baby girl ended up at the centre of a medical drama. Initially, her daughter had been making positive progress on the neonatal unit, and was moved to a nursery ward where she continued gaining strength. Having reached 5lbs, her parents were preparing for her to be discharged when they arrived one morning - shortly after Letby had been on shift - to find alarms ringing and their daughter's health rapidly deteriorating. [...]

The mum said: "I screamed for them to open up the incubator to get an oxygen mask on her. She had to have a lumbar puncture, then was put back in intensive care. No infection was found." Around the time she was born, the woman's daughter had a brain scan and the results were clear, she said. However, eight months later in May 2015, she visited a consultant after realising her daughter was struggling to sit upright. An MRI scan confirmed that she had brain damage with cerebral palsy. [...]

"In the picture, the plaster should be taped to her nose to keep it on, but it isn't. It's not a nice photo, and I don't know why anyone would take a picture of it.

The mum later got in contact with police to voice her concerns over Letby taking care of her daughter, and the lack of an explanation for her condition. She said: "Their first response was that it wasn't in the timeframe they were looking at. When they widened the dates slightly I emailed again, but they said 'it's not part of our investigation and we suggest you speak to her consultant'. [...]

 

Episode 63, The expert witness​



Partial transcript:


Dr Dewi Evans
: “so having completed my reports on the 32 cases by November 2017 I sent them all off to Cheshire Police, highlighting the ones I thought were concerning and telling them ‘cross-reference who was on duty for these babies’. And of course for the 15 there was one nurse on duty for all of these cases.

Liz Hull: and we’re talking about 15 we should probably just say because the other two are the insulin cases, which make up to the 17 babies involved in the trial.

DE: Yes. So what I then said to the police that they shouldn’t rely on my opinion alone. You need to get someone else. So they sent my reports to a consultant neonatologist in Newcastle upon Tyne, Dr Martin Ward Platt. His view was exactly the same as mine. But sadly he became seriously ill and died, and this is why he was not part of the prosecution team. So that led to the police finding Dr Sandie Bohin who had been a neonatologist in Leicester before moving to Guernsey. Her role was to scrutinise my reports, peer review my reports. So she came to the same conclusions as I did, some of these babies were victims of inflicted direct harm, direct trauma, some were victims of air into the circulation, and some had milk or milk and air injected into their stomachs. And of course several of these babies had sustained multiple assaults and several of them were the victims of having air into the stomach and air into the bloodstream.

LH: there’s been a lot of questions about why Ben Myers didn’t call a medical expert for Lucy Letby. We know from court that he, they did employ a medical expert to review your reports and to review the cases. So can you tell us why you think he didn’t call him, or why, you know, it’s intriguing.

DE: For the past 10 years I’ve probably prepared as many reports for the defence in criminal cases as I have for the police, for the prosecution. And the rules in relation to the defence are totally different. The defence is under no obligation to disclose anything. Now what they are obliged to do is to get an independent opinion if the prosecution says that the defendant has harmed an individual and that the evidence is based on medical expertise. So therefore they need to get their own expert, or experts. And this is what they did. But once I saw the reports from the two paediatricians, this is in June, I told the prosecution team and Cheshire Police they are not going to call their expert witnesses.

LH: So in your opinion did you feel like those reports were prepared to counter your reports rather than to explain what had happened to the babies?

DE: That is correct.

LH: and we know, don’t we, that their expert sat in the court next door, and that’s perfectly legal, you sat there and listened to the evidence as it came out from the medics at the Countess, and he did the same, and listened to your evidence as well…

DE: Yes.

LH: …so, they were fully in the picture, and they could have been called but Mr Myers for whatever reason decided that he wouldn’t call his expert."
 
Last edited:

9:46am

The court hearing is expected to begin at 10.30am.
We will provide updates from the courtroom at Manchester Crown Court.

10:14am

Dozens of members of the media have now entered court 4 at Manchester Crown Court, one of the larger courtrooms in the building, in advance of the hearing.

10:22am

Nicholas Johnson KC, the prosecutor in the Lucy Letby trial, and Benjamin Myers KC, for Letby's defence, have arrived in the courtroom, along with their respective legal teams.

10:26am

Lucy Letby is appearing via videolink from HMP Newhall.

10:28am

The judge has entered the courtroom, and Letby has confirmed she can hear proceedings.

10:32am

The prosecution say they are seeking a retrial in the case of the attempted murder of Child K, and not the remaining counts.

10:33am

Such a retrial would last about two weeks, the prosecution and judge agree on, but the judge adds that juries can deliberate for some time. He says a retrial would therefore last up to three weeks.

10:35am

The judge says it would be "inappropriate" for that retrial to take place until the application of appeal was processed.

10:35am

Such a retrial would take place from October 7, 2024, the judge adds, saying that is "the first available date".

10:40am

Mr Myers rises to say Letby maintains her innocence on the unresolved matters.
He outlines the difficulties on what could be presented to the jury in a retrial.
He says '2-3 weeks' is a "reasonable estimate" for the length of that trial, and says next October presents some difficulties for the defence team, owing to a long-running case scheduled for around that time.

10:43am

The judge says he is prepared not to fix a date for a retrial, but to say the trial would 'not take place before' a specific date.
A date next June is now offered by the court clerk, and the retrial is provisionally fixed for June 10, 2024, as that availability appears more suited to the prosecution and defence.
Mr Justice James Goss says he is unable to confirm whether he would be the judge for that retrial.

10:44am

The judge confirms the retrial would take place in Manchester, as it would not be possible "to accommodate anywhere else which would be appropriate".

10:51am

The judge says a jury will be directed, in the retrial, to judge the case solely on the evidence that is presented before them.

11:28am

The court has resumed following an adjournment.

11:30am

The judge confirms what can be reported to the media, in that the prosecution intends to seek a retrial on the attempted murder case of Child K, listed for June 10, 2024, expected to last between two and three weeks.

11:42am

It has been clarified the prosecution is, at this stage, not intending to proceed with a retrial on the remaining five counts.

12:00pm

The Crown Prosecution Service has issued a statement following today's court hearing:
Jonathan Storer, Chief Crown Prosecutor for CPS Mersey-Cheshire, said: “These decisions on whether to seek retrials on the remaining counts of attempted murder were extremely complex and difficult.
“Before reaching our conclusions we listened carefully to the views of the families affected, police and prosecution counsel.
“Many competing factors were considered including the evidence heard by the court during the long trial and its impact on our legal test for proceeding with a prosecution.
“We have met with all the families affected by these decisions to explain how they were reached.”



12:28KEY EVENT

Solicitor for 7 babies' families 'disappointed' with CPS decision​

Tamlin Bolton, a Senior Associate Solicitor at Switalskis, represents the families of seven babies.
In a statement today, she said: "At Switalskis, we are disappointed with the CPS decision to not proceed with a retrial on all of the cases. We believe that the families of the further alleged victims still have questions that are unanswered, and they deserve to know what happened to their children."
 
The former neonatal nurse, originally from Hereford, attended the hour-long hearing via videolink from a conference room at HMP New Hall in Wakefield, West Yorkshire.
Sat behind a desk, Letby spoke only to confirm her name and that she could see and hear the proceedings.

 

CPS statement on Lucy Letby retrial decisions​

25 September 2023|News

We have sought a retrial on one count of attempted murder against Lucy Letby – there should be no reporting, commentary or sharing of information online which could in any way prejudice these proceedings.

Jonathan Storer, Chief Crown Prosecutor, CPS Mersey-Cheshire, said:
“These decisions on whether to seek retrials on the remaining counts of attempted murder were extremely complex and difficult.
“Before reaching our conclusions we listened carefully to the views of the families affected, police and prosecution counsel.
“Many competing factors were considered including the evidence heard by the court during the long trial and its impact on our legal test for proceeding with a prosecution.
“We have met with all the families affected by these decisions to explain how they were reached.”
ENDS

Notes to editors​

  • Our legal guidance on retrials is available to read here: Retrials | The Crown Prosecution Service (cps.gov.uk)
  • Our legal test for prosecution, the Code for Crown prosecutors, is available to read here: The Code for Crown Prosecutors | The Crown Prosecution Service (cps.gov.uk)
  • In August, Lucy Letby was found guilty of seven counts of murder and seven counts of attempted murder. She was found not guilty of two counts of attempted murder. She was sentenced to life imprisonment with a whole-life term.
  • There were a further six counts of attempted murder - relating to five babies - on which the jury was unable to reach verdicts. Today’s decisions relate to these counts.

 
Child serial killer Lucy Letby does not oppose a bid to strike her from the nursing register but maintains her innocence in respect of her convictions, the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) has been told. [...]

Mr Scott will ask the panel to strike Letby off. Letby, of Hereford, was told of the hearing but did not attend and was not represented.


The panel decided to proceed in her absence. She faces a retrial next June for one count of attempted murder.

 
"The panel found she was unfit to practise nursing before it went on to make the striking-off order, a move they have heard Letby does not resist, despite maintaining her innocence in respect of her convictions. [...]

Herdan also said she had abused her position of trust as a nurse, had shown no remorse and that there were no mitigating factors.

He imposed an interim suspension order against Letby for 18 months to cover a potential appeal period."

[...]

 
(Over the next few days I'll be adding the media reports of the retrial which took place in June 2024)

Tuesday 11th June 2024

Chester Standard - link Lucy Letby: Jury sworn in for Countess nurse retrial

The jury for the retrial of Lucy Letby has been sworn in at Manchester Crown Court today (Tuesday, June 11).

[...]

The judge added Nicholas Johnson KC would deliver the prosecution opening on Wednesday, June 12, from 11am, followed by a defence statement from Benjamin Myers KC. After the opening, the trial will continue with 12 jurors.


Wednesday 12th June 2024

Chester Standard - link Recap: Prosecution opens case in Lucy Letby retrial

9:28am
This is the beginning of the retrial of Lucy Letby before a jury.
The 34-year-old former Countess of Chester Hospital nurse is accused of attempting to murder a baby girl at the hospital in February 2016.
Trial judge Mr Justice James Goss has told the jury, sworn in on Tuesday afternoon, that they are aware Letby - who denies the charge - has previously been convicted of murdering several babies and attempting to murder others.
He told them to try the case only on the evidence that is heard before them, and not to conduct any independent research or discuss the case with anyone.

9:29am
We will be providing live updates throughout the day as the prosecution is expected to deliver its opening this morning.

9:39am
Proceedings today are expected to begin at the slightly later time of 11am. Jurors have been informed a typical court day will run from 10.30am to 4.15pm, with a lunch break at about 1pm.
They have also been told the case will not be sitting this Friday (June 14).

11:39am
The trial is now resuming.

11:40am
Prosecutor Nicholas Johnson KC is now delivering the opening. He explains who the legal teams are, including Benjamin Myers KC, for Letby's defence.

11:42am
He explains there was a long trial which took place in which Letby was convicted on seven counts of murdering babies and seven counts of attempting to murder six other babies.
He says they happened when Letby was working in the neonatal unit at the Countess of Chester Hospital.

11:43am
He says those convictions are relevant as it gives the jury significant evidence to Letby's intention, as to the allegation of what the prosecution say she attempted to do to the baby girl.

11:47am
Documents are now being distributed to the jury.
They include the neonatal unit review schedule, a floorplan of the neonatal unit with where babies were located at the start and the end of a shift. They include the baby girl on room 1 in the neonatal unit at the end of the shift.
Other babies on the unit are anonymised via initials. "Their names aren't relevant to the proceedings," Mr Johnson tells the jury.

11:50am
Also shown is which nurses were designated to each baby for that shift.
Lucy Letby was the designated nurse for two babies in room 2 that shift.
Mr Johnson says the events relating to the baby girl were in nursery room 1, and "that gives rise to certain questions".

11:55am
Mr Johnson shows the Sequence of Events, which he will refer to as 'SoE' and which jurors can access on their iPads, showing a timeline of events which happened around the indictment period.

11:56am
Jurors have already been taught how to use the iPads this morning, which led to the later start.

12:00pm
Mr Johnson shows the indictment which sets out the charge, that Letby attempted to murder the baby girl in February 2016.
Also provided is an agreed glossary of medical-related terms.
There are also 'agreed facts', that is material which is agreed between the prosecution and the defence.
Mr Johnson explains says such material should be treated as facts proved in the case, without the requirement for witnesses to be called to give evidence on such material.

12:02pm
Mr Johnson says a walkthrough video has been provided of the neonatal unit, which will be played to jurors as part of the prosecution opening.
He says this is as the unit looked back in 2016, and no longer exists.

12:05pm
Photographs of the neonatal unit layout are also provided. One is from the end of a nurses' station, with nursery room 1 towards the end of the picture.

12:08pm
Mr Johnson says the remainder of the documents folder is empty, but will be filled with records of police interviews with Lucy Letby.
He tells the jury that what the barristers say to them is "not the evidence", but to suggest what important evidence they should be looking out for, and "what the battle lines are".

12:10pm
A video walkthrough of the neonatal unit is now played to the court.
He explains the video pre-title of 'Operation Hummingbird' is simply the name of the case, and has no relevance to the jury.

12:19pm
The video was filmed in September 2021 and shows a nurse walking through the various rooms of the neonatal unit, including nursery room 1, the 'critical room'.

12:25pm
The video walkthrough goes through the remaining rooms in the neonatal unit. There are a total of four nursery rooms.

12:28pm
The video is made accessible to the jury's iPads, which any juror can access.

12:29pm
Mr Johnson says the date of concern is February 17, 2016.
He says by this stage, Lucy Letby had murdered five babies, and had attempted to murder three more.
She had twice attempted to murder one of the latter.

12:31pm
He says after this date [February 17, 2016], Letby murdered two of three triplets on June 23-24, 2016, and had attempted to murder twins on April 9, 2016, and a boy on June 3, 2016.

12:34pm
Mr Johnson shows, as part of the sequence of events, Facebook searches Letby had made for family members of babies who had died in June 2015.
Mr Johnson says these are not the only Facebook searches Letby had made, as she had searched for parents of other babies who have nothing to do with the case.
He says Letby "undoubtedly" murdered babies, and then searched for their parents. Two of the Facebook searches, for parents of two different babies Letby murdered, are listed a minute apart.

12:37pm
Further Facebook searches are shown, including repeated searches for some parents of murdered babies.

12:38pm
Mr Johnson says those Facebook searches continued until after June 2016.

12:42pm
Mr Johnson now turns to the events in February 2016, when the mother of the baby girl arrived at the Countess of Chester Hospital on the morning of Monday, February 15.
Clinical notes are shown as transcribed versions and in their original handwriting, in the sequence of events.

12:44pm
Mr Johnson tells the jury that the baby girl was "very, very premature", at a gestation of 24 weeks and six days [compared to a 'standard' 40-week pregnancy], but the mother was already in labour.

12:45pm
Mr Johnson explains that the baby girl was to need a transfer to a tertiary centre in the Mersey/Cheshire area, which would be either Liverpool Women's Hospital or Arrowe Park. The Countess of Chester Hospital was not a tertiary centre.

12:50pm
Consultant obstetrician Dr Sarah Brigham, a senior doctor whose speciality is pregnancy and childbirth and the time after that birth, wrote there was a need to transfer the baby girl to a level 3 neonatal unit.
Mr Johnson says normally the Countess would not have dealt with such premature deliveries, but he added that events took over, and the nearest available level 3 unit at the time was Preston. Given the risks involved with transport, Dr Sarah Brigham noted in relation to the potential transfer: 'cancelled patient unstable to transfer'.

12:54pm
Mr Johnson refers to a text message Lucy Letby had sent to colleague at this time, '...24wkr [weeker] wanted nvd [non-vaginal delivery] so was 6cm when we left this morning...'.
Nursing colleague Alisa Simpson replied '...Aw it's a shame that Mum wasn't stable enough to be transferred out...'

12:56pm
On Wednesday, February 17, at 2.12am, the baby girl was born.
Mr Johnson says she did "remarkably well" for such a premature baby.
'Apgar' scores for the baby girl are shown of 4/10 for one minute after birth, 9/10 at five minutes, 9/10 at 10 minutes. A number of factors including colour and response to touch are assessed. Scores of "seven or above" are considered babies in good condition, Mr Johnson says.

12:59pm
At the time of the birth, Mr Johnson says, Letby was with nursing colleague Joanne Williams, having signed and countersigned for medication for a neonatal unit baby in room 2.

1:02pm
The court now adjourns for the lunch break.
The trial judge reassures the jury not to assimilate everything that has been said so far, as it is an introduction.
He urges the jurors not to talk to anyone about the case, including other jurors.
 
Wednesday 12th June 2024 continued

Chester Standard - link Recap: Prosecution opens case in Lucy Letby retrial

2:17pm
The trial is now resuming.
Nicholas Johnson KC continues the prosecution opening.

2:19pm
He explains the baby girl [which for this blog shall henceforth be named Child K] was intubated at 2.32am, prior to the transfer to the neonatal unit at 2.40am. To explain this process, a video is played to the jury.

2:28pm
Mr Johnson says there are a number of times the tube moved for Child K.

2:35pm
Mr Johnson says for that shift, Dr John Gibbs was the paediatrician for that week. Dr Ravi Jayaram is listed as the on-call consultant between 4.30pm and 8.30am.
Nursing staff are shift leader Caroline Oakley, with designated nurse Joanne Williams, and other nurses Lucy Letby and Sophie Ellis, plus nursery nurse Valerie Thomas.
A floorplan shows Letby was the designated nurse for two babies in nursery room 2 at the start of that night shift.
Two babies were being looked after in room 1 by designated nurse Caroline Oakley.
Joanne Williams was designated nurse for a baby in room 2. She was later designated as the nurse for Child K that night.

2:36pm
Between 2.36am and 2.50am, Lucy Letby was making nursing notes for one of the two babies she was designated to look after in room 2.

2:38pm
At 2.45am, Child K was given surfactant down an ET tube, to help with her lungs.

2:43pm
At 3am, IV fluids for Child K were set up by nurses Joanne Williams and Caroline Oakley.
At that time, Lucy Letby was making entries on the notes for one of the babies she was designated nurse for - between 3.02am-3.12am.
At 3.11am, Joanne Williams entered the neonatal unit from the labour ward, Mr Johnson tells the court.

2:44pm
Notes from the transport service say Dr Ravi Jayaram made a call to them at 3.15am, to arrange transport for Child K, to a level 3 hospital. At this time, Lucy Letby was giving medication to a baby she was a designated nurse for in room 2.

2:49pm
At 3.30am, Letby recorded observations for that room 2 baby.
Also at that time, "a lot of things were being recorded", Mr Johnson says. Letby signed for morphine for Child K with Joanne Williams. The morphine was a painkiller and sedation. It was to be given as Child K had been intubated, Mr Johnson tells the court.
It is so they don't interfere with the tube, he adds.

2:53pm
Joanne Williams records the vital signs for Child K at 3.30am.
Just before 3.40am, Caroline Oakley was away from the unit as, at 3.40am, there is a digital record of her coming back into the unit.
Nursery nurse Valerie Thomas, looking after babies in rooms 3 and 4, was out of the unit, as again there is a record of her returning to the unit at 3.40am.

2:55pm
At about that time, Dr Ravi Jayaram is recorded as communicating with the transport team, being on the phone at the nurses' station.
It was about this time that Child K collapsed, Mr Johnson tells the court.
The allegation, he says, is "straightforward".

2:57pm
He says Joanne Williams had left the neonatal unit at this time to see Child K's mother, having left Child K ventilated and sedated.
Dr Jayaram was "distracted" and other nurses were out of the unit.
"That would leave Sophie Ellis and Lucy Letby in the unit covering four nurseries," Mr Johnson added.
While Joanne Williams was out of room 1, Lucy Letby was in there on her own. That is what Dr Jayaram saw when he went in there at the time of the collapse, Mr Johnson says.

3:00pm
Mr Johnson says Child K was connected to a machine checking her heart rate and oxygen levels. Those machines should have alarmed if there was an issue, but they did not. Someone had disabled them, Mr Johnson says.
"Not only that, but Lucy Letby was doing nothing.
"We say that in those circumstances, the only reasonable thing for a nurse to have done was to call for help and/or use the Neopuff to breathe for the child."
The ET Tube had become displaced, Mr Johnson says.
"The fact Lucy Letby was doing nothing and the alarm was not sounding was...that Letby... the convicted murderer, had displaced the tube."

3:01pm
Nursing notes, written retrospectively by Joanne Williams, said Child K had begun to desaturate to "dangerous" levels.
Child K's ET Tube was "dislodged". It was removed and she was reintubated on the second attempt.
Mr Johnson asks the issue is how did the tube become dislodged.

3:05pm
Child K was given a loading dose of morphine "to guard against the possibility that this very premature child had wriggled to extubate herself".
The morphine dose and infusion administration were timed at 3.50am. It is initialled 'JW', but in the handwriting of Lucy Letby.
"Lucy Letby had been caught virtually red-handed by Dr Jayaram," Mr Johnson says, adding that Child K's ET Tube later dislodged twice more, and the evidence establishes that Lucy Letby was there, even though the babies she was to look after were in room 2.

3:07pm
Lucy Letby "became closely involved" with Child K's care "despite" having primary responsibility in room 2.
She was "making [Child K] part of her business", Mr Johnson tells the jury.
At 4.20am Letby cosigned for medication for Child K while Joanne Williams was coming from the labour ward.
About 20 minutes later, medication was given to Child K by Lucy Letby and Caroline Oakley.
Between 4.48am and 5.07am, Child K's designated nurse was completing nursing notes for the baby girl. While that was happening, Lucy Letby and Caroline Oakley were giving further medication to Child K.
At 5.23am, Letby was again involved.

3:08pm
At 5.53am, a note from the transport team recorded Dr Jayaram was keen to get Child K to Arrowe Park Hospital. It was noted: 'keen not to miss window of opportunity whilst baby stable'.

3:14pm
Between 6.04am-6.10am, Letby formally booked in Child K to the neonatal unit on the computer system.
In the checklist is the care of an ET Tube.
Much of the computerised record is taken from a handwritten form. Mr Johnson says the handwritten notes are kept with the baby by the incubator.
Mr Johnson: "She would have had to get the records for [Child K] from the incubator. Once she had completed that, she would have had to return the handwritten records to the incubator."

3:15pm
During that time, recorded at 6.07am and 23 seconds, an X-ray is taken of Child K, by radiographer Anne Kember, using a mobile machine. The x-ray was taken in nursery room 1.
A video, demonstrating how an intubated baby has an x-ray taken by the mobile machine, is played to the court.

3:21pm
The X-ray reports 'ET Tube in satisfactory position'.
It adds: 'NG Tube [feeding tube] in satisfactory position with its tip in the gastric body'.
Mr Johnson says the time the x-ray is recorded may not be accurate.
At 6.09am, Anne Kember is recorded as entering the neonatal unit. He says the process of the x-ray takes about 10-15 minutes, which means the x-ray happened at about 6.20am.
Within a few minutes of that, the ET Tube was dislodged again.
Mr Johnson says that Lucy Letby was trying to create the impression that Child K, "heavily sedated", had dislodged her own tube.

3:26pm
The third desaturation happened at the time of the handover to the day shift.
A nursing colleague was the shift leader at this time. As she came in, she heard a call for help from Lucy Letby, who was not the designated nurse for Child K.
Letby was at the incubator of Child K in nursery room 1.

3:29pm
The day shift leader, Dr Jayaram, Mel Taylor and nurse Williams went in. The issue was the ET Tube was too far in - by 1.5cm, or about 20% too far in.
The ET Tube was withdrawn and Child K picked up immediately, Mr Johnson says.
He adds this [Child K's ET Tube being dislodged] was the same problem, twice after Dr Jayaram had witnessed it.
"We say that is coincidences too far," Mr Johnson tells the court.
He says Letby had tried to "create the impression" Child K had a problem.

3:31pm
Mr Johnson says Child K was moved to the transport incubator at noon, then handed over to the team taking her to Arrowe Park at 12.25pm.

3:33pm
Later that day, Letby replied to a text by a nursing colleague, saying: "25wkr delivered so fairly busy".
Child K died at Arrowe Park Hospital on February 20. Mr Johnson says the prosecution do not say what Lucy Letby did caused Child K's death.
On April 20, 2018, at 11.56pm, Letby searched on Facebook for the surname of Child K.

3:34pm
Mr Johnson says that "has significance" when taken in conjunction with Letby's other Facebook searches for parents of babies she killed.

3:36pm
Mr Johnson says the case may come down to a single issue - 'do you believe Dr Jayaram saying what he saw? Do you believe he is telling you the truth about what he saw? And if you do, do you accept what we allege Lucy Letby was trying to do, bearing in mind what we have also proved.'

3:37pm
That concludes the prosecution opening.

3:38pm
Benjamin Myers KC, for Letby's defence, now gives the opening statement for the defence.
He acknowledges the sympathy for the family of Child K, and recognises the loss of Child K.
"Nothing I do or say is intended to diminish that."

3:41pm
Mr Myers says "it could be very easy for some people to approach" that Lucy Letby "must be guilty" or, 'equally as bad', that they "don't care if she is guilty or not".
He says if that was the case, the idea of a fair trial would be gone.
He adds this trial jury does not feature such people. He says they are to give a true verdict on the evidence, not one of emotional reaction, or of sympathy, or of anything heard outside the courtroom.
"A fair trial on the basis of the evidence is what this is all about."

3:45pm
Mr Myers says he wished to identify "key issues" for the defence, and this is "an outline", and will not be the same length as the prosecution opening.
He says the defence speech will come after the evidence is heard in the trial.
He adds there is no record of exactly where Dr Ravi Jayaram was or what he was doing at the time Child K desaturated.

3:48pm
He says there are three areas, focusing on aspects of the case, for jurors to keep in mind.
The first is how fragile Child K was, clinically. He says any baby born under 37 weeks is classed as premature. At 25 weeks, Child K was "extremely premature".
He says ideally, Child K would not have been born at the Countess, but at a level 3 unit, providing the most intense and specialised level of care. He says that could not be done as doctors caring for the mother concluded the risk transferring her to a suitable unit was "too great".
The Countess was "not the level of unit designed" to care for the prematurity of the baby.

3:51pm
The second area is the problems of care, including intubation.
He says Child K was struggling to breathe from the start of life, and was unable to breathe unaided, which he says "sadly, is unsurprising", given the level of her prematurity.
He says it is known Child K suffered an oxygen desaturation between 3.45am-3.50am. A reason for that would be the ET Tube moved.
He says the prosecution allegation is Letby deliberately moved the tubing. The defence case is Letby did not do that, and "has been blamed wrongly".

3:54pm
Mr Myers says they will look at how realistic the prosecution's theories are, that Letby deliberately dislodged the ET Tube multiple times, during the trial.
He says the third factor is to look at what people said and did at the time, and to decide whether that is consistent with what the prosecution now allege, in particular Dr Ravi Jayaram.

3:58pm
Mr Myers says Dr Jayaram was the lead clinician on the unit that night, the senior doctor with overall responsibility.
Mr Myers outlines Dr Jayaram's account, that he suspect the tube had been deliberately dislodged, and the alarm was not sounding.
He says Lucy Letby does not remember specifically the events of that night. He says in the background of caring for hundreds of babies, that is "hardly surprising, if she did nothing wrong".
He says the case comes to a "pretty stark issue", that Child K desaturated because Lucy Letby interfered with the ET Tube, or not.
That depends on whether Dr Jayaram's account is true and accurate, or not. He says if it is not, the jury cannot convict.
He says the prosecution and defence are in agreement that the evidence of Dr Jayaram is crucial.

4:00pm
Mr Myers says Letby is not guilty of this allegation. He refers to the previous convictions.
"It is important these convictions do not prove this allegation".

4:01pm
He says however much dramatic impact those previous convictions have, it is crucial that the jury looks on the evidence that happened on February 17, 2016.
He says that evidence "does not support what has been alleged".

4:05pm
That completes the opening statements.
Trial judge Mr Justice James Goss asks if the main 12 members of the jury are able to continue to serve as jurors. They agree.
The two reserve jurors, who have been present today, are released back into the general pool of jurors. They are urged, to preserve the integrity of the trial, that they do not speak about the case to any of the 12 jurors about the case until the trial is all over.
He says the same applies to the 12, not to speak to the two reserve jurors, or anyone else, about the case.

4:07pm
That concludes today's case before the jury, and they are to return to court on Thursday at 10.30am.
He reminds them the case will not be sitting on Friday. Additionally, the case will not be heard before noon on Monday, June 17.
 
Wednesday 12th June 2024

Manchester Evening News live updates - link Lucy Letby retrial updates as ex-nurse accused of murder attempt

The trial is underway​

The judge is in court and the trial is now underway.

He has explained the jury were brought into court earlier this morning to be shown how to use the iPad that they will use throughout the trial.

Prosecution is opening the case​

Prosecutor Nick Johnson KC is now beginning his opening address.

He said Letby is represented by Ben Myers KC.

Mr Johnson KC said Lucy Letby is charged with a single offence of attempted murder, with which this jury will be concerned with.

Jury told Letby was previously convicted of the murder of seven babies​

He said Letby was convicted of murdering seven babies and attempted to murder six others, one twice.

“All that happened whilst Lucy Letby was working as a neonatal nurse in the neonatal unit at Countess of Chester Hospital in Chester,” he said.

The other cases have an ‘importance’, not because of what she has done previously, but what the Crown are suggesting is the relevance gives significant evidence what her intention was at the time.

'We say her status as a multiple murderer is an important piece of evidence'​

Mr Johnson continues: "In a nutshell, we say that her status as a multiple murderer and attempted murderer is an important piece of evidence that you can and should take into account when you are considering whether we have proved that she was trying to kill Child K."

He is now explaining the contents of a jury bundle.

Child K was in nursery of neonatal unit​

He said that Child K was in the nursery of the neonatal unit. He is explaining that each infant had their own nurse, called the ‘designated nurse’.

He said the two babies that Letby was the designated nurse for at the time, were both in nursery two, yet the events that took place against Child K were in nursery one.

Prosecutor is explaining the sequence of events​

The prosecutor is now explaining the sequence of events document, referred to as the SOE.

He is also taking the jurors through a medical glossary of terms that will be used during the trial.

Jurors shown images of nursery​

Jurors are being shown images of nursery one.

Mr Johnson said that the prosecution opening is not evidence in the case, but it is to show what the Crown suggests the jury should be looking out for.

He is now playing a video taken of the neonatal unit as it was in 2016.

Crown say she attempted to murder child on February 17 2016​

Mr Johnson said that is the Crown’s case that she attempted to murder Child K on February 17 2016.

He said that in the evidence by this stage Letby had murdered five children:

  • Child A on 8th June 2015
  • Child C on 14th June 2015
  • Child D on 22nd June 2015
  • Child E on 4th August 2015
Child I on 23rd October 2015

The prosecutor said she had attempted to murder:

  • Child B on the night of 9-10th June 2015
  • Child F On 5th August 2015
  • Child G On both 7th and 21st September 2015
Then after what she is alleged to have done to Child K, Letby went on to murder to of three triplets:

  • Child O and Child P on 23rd to 24th June 2016
And also went on to attempt to murder:

  • Child L and Child M on 9th April 2016
  • Child N on 3rd June 2016

Letby 'searched child's mother on Facebook'​

Taking the jurors through the SOE, Mr Johnson said after the death of Child A, Letby searched for their mother on Facebook.

Mr Johnson took them through a number of occasions where she did this adding that she ‘undoubtedly’ murdered the children and searched for their parents, alleging that she did the same around the parents of Child K.

Child K was born 'very premature'​

Turning to the birth of Child K, Mr Johnson said that just after 9am on 15th February 2016, her mother called the hospital with ‘worrying symptoms’, the court heard.

He said she arrived at 9.58am, was triaged, her temperature, pulse and blood pressure were taken.

Medics believed her cervix was dilated and she was in preterm labour, the prosecutor said.

Child K was described as being very premature, at 24 weeks and six days gestation.

Medics had to 'balance risk'​

The consultant obstetrician noted 'we will need to transfer to level 3 NNU' due to her low gestational age, Mr Johnson said.

The prosecutor said despite best intentions, medics had to 'balance the risk' of moving her to another hospital as she might have 'given birth on the motorway', and so the decision was made to keep the mum at the Countess of Chester Hospital.

Timestamps​

On the morning of February 17, 2016 - at 1.20am - the mother of Child K was about to give birth, the prosecutor said. Child K was later born at 2.12am and was doing ‘remarkably well’ for her young age.

She was given an APGAR which monitors blood pressure and gives heart readings. Any score over 7 is ‘good’. Child K had a ‘good’ reading.

He said ‘we are able to see where Letby was’ at the time of the birth because of a computerised record that is automatically timestamped in the neonatal unit by staff inputting their personal codes into the system.

At 2.14am Letby was timestamped, along with another nurse who had signed and countersigned for medication for another infant. The other nurse was the designated nurse for this child, the prosecutor said.

Evidence continues​

Mr Johnson is speaking about when Child K was admitted to the neonatal unit. She was passed to the care of registrar Dr James Smith who was working under the supervision of consultant Dr Ravi Jayaram. She was intubated by Dr Smith at 2.32am, he said.

Jurors are now being shown a video depicting how to intubate a person. In the video of the intubation procedure, the nurse explains that sometimes the intubation tube can become blocked with ‘secretions’ and have to be unblocked using suction.

Child K was intubated, jury told​

Continuing, Mr Johnson said that Child K was intubated, she was given some medication to make her lungs more pliable and was admitted to the neonatal unit at 2.40am.

Mr Johnson previously said there were a number of times the intubation tube moved for Child K.

Floor plan of nursery​

The prosecutor is now taking jurors through a floor plan of the nursery and who was responsible for which baby at the time.

“Given her extreme prematurity, Child K was taken into nursery 1. There were 2 other babies in there whose designated nurse was Caroline Oakley,” Mr Johnson said.

Letby was in nursery two​

In nursery 2, there were other babies being taken care of by other nurses, including Letby. Between 2.36am and 2.50am, Letby was making nursing notes for an infant – one of the two for whom she was the designated nurse in nursery 2, the court was told.

At 2.45am Child K was given surfactant, used to make the lungs of a premature baby more pliable, the prosecutor said. The digital prescription was given for this at 3am.

Evidence on medical procedures​

At 3am intravenous fluids for Child K were set up by two other nurses, at the same time Letby was making an entry in the notes of another baby. As she was finishing her note, another nurse was entering the neonatal unit having been to the labour ward, he said.

At 3.15am Dr Jayaram made a call to the Transport Service to arrange the movement of the baby girl to a ‘Level 3’ hospital, jurors were told. At that time, Letby was giving medication to a child she was the designated nurse for.

Child K was given morphine, jurors told​

“At 3.30am, a lot of things were being recorded,” Mr Johnson continued. At this point Child K hadn’t been named, the court heard. She was given morphine to sedate her to allow her to be intubated. “It’s so they don’t interfere with the tube,” he added.

Another nurse, Joanne Williams, who was her designated nurse, recorded her vital signs. In nursery 1 there were two infants under the care of designated nurse Caroline Oakley, who had left the unit and came back in at 3.40am.

At 3.41am Dr Jayaram was on the phone at the nurses station regarding the transport service.

It was at around this time that Child K collapsed, he said.

'She was in there alone and Child K collapsed', jurors told​

Nurse Williams had ensured Child K was stable before leaving the neonatal unit. She would not have been gone long,” Mr Johnson said.

“Whilst Nurse Williams was out of the unit, Letby was in there with Child K. She was in there alone and Child K collapsed,” he said.

This is what he saw when he walked into nursery 1. Child K had been left connected to the ventilator and she was connected to another machine that was checking her heart rate and 02 saturations.

Those alarms should have sounded and they did not. The reason for that was someone had disabled them, the prosecutor continued.

'Lucy Letby was doing nothing', jurors told​

“When Dr Jayaram walked into nursery 1 he saw Lucy Letby was standing over Child K desaturating but the alarm was not sounded and Lucy Letby was doing nothing,” Mr Johnson said.

"We say that in those circumstances, the only reasonable thing for a nurse to have done was to call for help and/or use the Neopuff to breathe for the child."

The intubation tube had become displaced, he said. Prosecutors allege that the fact Letby was doing nothing is evidence they can conclude that she - a 'convicted murderer' - had deliberately displaced the tube.

Letby caught 'red handed' by Dr Jayaram, jury told​

Notes written by nurse Williams said Child K had desaturated to ‘dangerous levels’. Her tube was dislodged. It was removed and she was reintubated on a second attempt, the court heard.

Mr Johnson said the issue was how the tube became dislodged. Child K was given a loading dose of morphine 'to guard against the possibility that this very premature child had wriggled to extubate herself'.

At 3.50am, the morphine dose and infusion administration were administered, initialled 'JW', but in the handwriting of Letby.

Letby had been caught ‘red handed’ by Dr Jayaram, Mr Johnson said. The prosecutor said Child K's ET Tube later dislodged twice more, and the evidence establishes that Letby was there, even though the babies she was to look after were in nursery 2.

Prosecution allege Lucy Letby was making Child K 'part of her business'​

The second collapse was at 6.15am, according to notes by Dr Jayaram. Letby had become ‘closely involved’ with Child K’s care despite having primary responsibilities in nursery 2, it was said.

She was 'making [Child K] part of her business', Mr Johnson said. At 4.20am Letby cosigned for medication for Child K while nurse Williams was coming from the labour ward.

About 20 minutes later, medication was given to Child K by Letby and nurse Oakley. Between 4.48am and 5.07am, Child K's designated nurse was completing nursing notes for the baby girl. While that was happening, Letby and nurse Oakley were giving further medication to Child K.

At 5.23am, Letby was again involved. At 5.53am a note from the transport service referred to the fact that Dr Jayaram was keen to get Child K to Arrowe Park Hospital. It read: "Keen not to miss window of opportunity whilst baby stable."

Evidence on notes​

Not long after that note, Letby went through formally booking in Child K to the neonatal unit on the computer system. In the checklist was the ET tube. Much of the computerised record was taken from handwritten notes which are kept with the baby by the incubator.

He added: "She would have had to get the records for [Child K] from the incubator. Once she had completed that, she would have had to return the handwritten records to the incubator." During that time, at 6.07am and 23 seconds, Child K was X-rayed using a mobile machine. This was taken in nursery 1.

A video is now being played to the court demonstrating how an intubated baby has an x-ray taken by a mobile machine.

X-ray of child shown to jury​

The x-ray image of Child K is being shown to the jury. It shows that the breathing tube was in the correct position, Mr Johnson said.

“Within five minutes of taking the image, the tube had become displaced again. And who was taking notes again. That is not an innocent coincidence,” Mr Johnson said.

'We say that Lucy Letby was seeking to create the impression that Child K was habitually extubating herself', jury told​

“We say that Lucy Letby was seeking to create the impression that Child K was habitually extubating herself,” he said. He explained that Letby was trying to create the impression that Child K, who was heavily sedated, had dislodged her own tube.

There was a further collapse when the nightshift was handing over to the day shift, at which Letby again tried to create this impression of the baby girl, the jury was told. The shift leader for the nursing staff came on at 7.30am, at which she heard a ‘call for help’ by Letby who was at Child K’s incubator in nursery 1, the prosecutor said.

The issue was that the breathing tube was ‘too far in’. It was withdrawn immediately and she was picked up immediately, it was said.

'Coincidences too far', prosecution alleges​

The prosecutor said this was ‘coincidences too far’. He said that this [Child K's ET Tube being dislodged] was the same problem, twice after Dr Jayaram had witnessed it.

"We say, Lucy Letby was trying to create the impression, of her being caught almost red handed, that this child had a particular problem," he said.

He clarified that with the second and third collapses, the prosecution did not suggest that she was trying to ‘kill’ the child. But having been alleged caught ‘red handed’ by Dr Jayaram earlier, she was ‘trying to create the impression that Child K was habitually desaturating by herself.

Letby's text​

Mr Johnson says Child K was moved to the transport incubator at noon, then handed over to the team taking her to Arrowe Park at 12.25pm.

Later that day, Letby replied to a text that she had been sent by a friend asking how busy she had been, she said: “25 wkr delivered so fairly busy.”

Child K died, but prosecution do not say Letby's alleged actions caused her death​

Child K died at Arrowe Park Hospital on February 20, the court heard. Mr Johnson says the prosecution do not say what Lucy Letby did caused Child K's death.

On April 20 2018, two years later, Letby searched on Facebook for the surname of Child K. Mr Johnson says that 'has significance' when taken in conjunction with Letby's other Facebook searches for parents of babies she killed.

Mr Johnson says the case may come down to a single issue. "Do you believe what Dr Jayaram is saying about what he saw? Do you believe he is telling you the truth about what he saw? And if you do, do you accept what we allege Lucy Letby was trying to do, bearing in mind what we have also proved."

That concludes the prosecution's opening address.
 
Wednesday 12th June 2024 continued

Manchester Evening News live updates continued - link Lucy Letby retrial updates as ex-nurse accused of murder attempt

Defence's opening statement​

Ben Myers KC, counsel for Letby, is now giving the opening statement for the defence. He acknowledged the sympathy for the family of Child K, and recognises the loss of Child K.

"Nothing I do or say is intended to diminish that," he said.

Defence addresses issue of defendant having a fair trial​

Mr Myers says 'it could be very easy for some people to approach' that Lucy Letby 'must be guilty' or, 'equally as bad', that they 'don't care if she is guilty or not'.

He says if that was the case, the idea of a fair trial would be gone. He adds that they are to give a true verdict on the evidence, not one of emotional reaction, or of sympathy, or unfair bias, or of anything heard outside the courtroom.

“A fair trial on the basis of evidence is what this case is all about,” he added.

Defence highlights that Child K was 'extremely premature'​

He added there is no record of exactly where Dr Ravi Jayaram was or what he was doing at the time Child K desaturated.

Introducing the key issues in the case as an ‘outline’, he said there are three areas. The first is how fragile Child K was, clinically. He says any baby born under 37 weeks is classed as premature. At 25 weeks, Child K was 'extremely premature'.

He said Child K was born at 25 weeks gestation, and she should have been moved to a level 3 hospital, where staff would provide the most intense and specialised level of care.

She was instead born at the Countess of Chester Hospital, which was 'not the level of unit designed' to care for such a premature baby.

“It is not where professionals would have chosen for her to be born, all things being equal,” he said.

Defence says Letby has been 'blamed wrongly'​

The second issue was relating to the care, and intubation, of Child K. Mr Myers said Child K was struggling to breathe from the start of her life and was unable to breathe unaided, which was 'sadly unsurprising' given her prematurity.

He says that it is known that Child K suffered an oxygen desaturation between 3.45am to 3.50am. A reason for that would be the ET Tube moved, he told jurors.

He says the prosecution allegation is that Letby 'deliberately moved' the tubing. My Myers said the defence case is that Letby did not do that, and 'has been blamed wrongly'.

Letby, jurors hear, cannot recall night in question​

The third area, he said, was the evidence of Dr Ravi Jayaram. He was the senior doctor with overall responsibility, he said.

“He said he saw Ms Letby in circumstances where Child K was desaturating, the alarm was not sounding and Ms Letby was doing nothing to assist,” he said.

He said Letby could not recall the night and said this was ‘hardly surprising’ as there were ‘hundreds of babies’ in the unit during that time.

Ultimately this comes down to the evidence of Dr Jayaram, he added.

'The prosecution relies on the convictions from the first trial'​

Turning to her previous convictions, Mr Myers KC said: “She said she is not guilty of the allegation. The prosecution relies on the convictions from the first trial.

“She has maintained, always, she is not guilty of that. She is guilty of nothing.

“Well you have those convictions and you will consider them and they are potentially powerful and emotive aspects of this case.”

He said the convictions ‘do not make it easier to convict’, adding: “It’s important that these convictions do not prove this allegation.

He added that jurors are only concerned with evidence directly related to 17th February 2016.

Defence opening concludes​

The defence opening address has now concluded.

Judge addresses the jury​

The trial judge, Mr Justice Goss, asks if the main 12 members of the jury are able to continue to serve as jurors. They agree.

The two reserve jurors, who have been present today, have been released. They are urged not to speak to any of the 12 jurors about the case, to preserve the integrity of the trial, until the trial is over.

He says the same applies to the 12, not to speak to the two reserve jurors, or anyone else, about the case.

He added that they must not research anything or anyone involved in the case.

Trial concludes for the day​

The trial has concluded and jurors have been sent home for the day. It will continue tomorrow at 10.30am.
 
Thursday 13th June 2024

Live updates from Manchester Evening News - link Lucy Letby retrial updates as ex-nurse accused of murder attempt

Trial resumes​

The jurors are brought back into court and the trial has resumed.

The prosecution begins by reading the statement of Child K's mother.

Thursday, June 13 - 11:08John Scheerhout

Statement of Child K's mother read to court​

The woman said she discovered she was pregnant in August 2015 and she said she and her husband were ‘both thrilled with the news’.
The pregnancy ‘progressed normally’ and the pair was told there were ‘no issues’ when they attended their 12-week scan.
A minor issue was identified at 15 weeks gestation but the couple were ‘reassured everything was fine’ and all tests came back ‘negative’, the jurors are told.
The mother described how she was returning to the Countess of Chester Hospital every two or three weeks to see a consultant.
“Everything was developing fine,” said the woman, who cannot be named for legal reasons.

Thursday, June 13 - 11:20John Scheerhout

Mother of Child K went into labour at 25 weeks pregnant​

The woman recalled walking up in pain during the morning of 15 February, 2016, when the unborn infant was at 25 weeks’ gestation.
She said her partner suggested they call the midwife who advised she attend the labour ward.
When the couple arrived, the woman said she was taken into a side room where a number of checks were done and she was told she was dilated by 2cm.
The woman said she knew ‘something was happening’ and that she had gone into labour. She was admitted onto the ward where she was ‘closely monitored’.
The woman described treatment she received and how arrangements were being made by staff to transfer her to Arrowe Park Hospital, which the jurors heard has a specialist maternity unit which deals with very premature babies.
That evening the woman said she discussed with a medic at the Countess of Chester Hospital having a C-section.
“There was no indication from the medical team that they had any concerns regarding (Child K). She wasn;t showing any signs of distress,” she said.
Her heart rate was good and a decision was made to keep the baby at the Countess of Chester, the woman said.

Thursday, June 13 - 11:27John Scheerhout

Parents didn't have any concerns about Child K when she was born​

The woman said that during the evening of February 16 she woke up in pain at the hospital and her partner pressed the red panic alarm on a wall in her room which was soon ‘full of staff’.
The midwife got her ready for delivery and Child K was born just after 2am on February 17, the jurors were told.
Staff, she said, worked on Child K for 30 to 45 minutes, she said.
They placed a tube to aid the baby’s breathing and placed a hat on the baby to keep her warm.
“As far as we were aware there was nothing to be concerned about,” said the woman, describing her baby’s weight at 692g or 1lb 8oz.

Thursday, June 13 - 11:41John Scheerhout

Mother of Child K remembers nurse 'appearing at her side'​

The woman said there ‘seemed to be so many people around’ as medics sought to care for her.
She said ‘the next thing I remember’ was a nurse appearing at her bedside. The nurse had blonde hair tied in a ponytail, was ‘a little round’, aged in her 30s and was wearing a blue uniform.
“She came into the room and told us (Child K) was fine. She was stable and doing really well,” said the woman.
The nurse asked if they would like to see the baby and both parents immediately said yes, said the woman.
The woman described how the nurse helped her into a wheelchair and pushed her to the neonatal unit.
The nurse offered to take pictures of the infant on the father’s phone. “She took several pictures,” said the woman, who said after a few minutes she went back to the labour ward as she felt sleepy.
The woman said the time-stamp on the pictures showed they were taken at 4.30am on February 17 when the baby was just a few hours old.

Thursday, June 13 - 11:55John Scheerhout

Mother of Child K describes 'the strangest feeling'​

While she was sleeping, the woman said she was woken by someone who came into her room to say a bed was now available at Arrowe Park Hospital.
The member of staff explained how Child K had to be moved into a ‘transport incubator’ to get her to Arrowe Park, the jurors were told.
The woman said it was at this stage the couple decided on a name for their baby.
She said she was wheeled down to the neonatal unit to see Child K before being moved to Arrowe Park. While her partner followed the ambulance, the woman said she had yet to be discharged from the Countess of Chester and so she remained at the hospital.
She described how staff were ‘desperately getting organised’ so she could be discharged to make her way to Arrowe Park. She was finally discharged at 2pm and made her way straight to Arrowe Park, the court was told.
The woman described how the couple were staying in Ronald McDonald House, specialist accommodation for parents at the hospital. “I was lying awake when I had the strangest feeling I cannot begin to describe,” said the woman.

Thursday, June 13 - 12:18John Scheerhout

Woman said she knew 'straight away' things weren't great​

The woman said she asked her partner if he was awake and he was, and she asked if they should go and see Child K. They decided to visit the neonatal unit which was said to be free for parents to visit at any time.
When they saw their baby, the woman said she noticed the saturation readings ‘were low’.
“I knew straight away things weren’t great,” said the woman, who went on that a doctor ‘confirmed the worst’.
The doctor said Child K had been ‘fighting all night’ and that medics had been struggling to improve her readings.
“I asked the doctor ‘is it just a waiting game now?’ and ‘is she going to get better?’ We had a long conversation with the doctor who explained (Child K) was not getting better and what happens next is entirely our decision,” said the woman.
She described how her baby had been ‘passed from pillar to post from the moment she was born’.
“Her tiny swollen body had suffered so much. We didn’t want her to suffer anymore,” said the woman.
The couple made a decision together to switch off Child K’s life support machine ‘to let her go’, she said.
“This was by far the hardest decision of my life,” she said.

Thursday, June 13 - 12:20John Scheerhout

Mother of Child K describes moments before baby's death​

The woman said staff showed them to a family room away from the ward which was ‘peaceful and quiet’.
Their baby was given to them wrapped in a blanket attached to a hand-held pump to aid her breathing, the court heard.
“She was placed into our arms.” she said. “The doctor said we can do this whenever you are ready.”
The doctor removed the pump and left the room, saying he would return in 20 minutes.
The woman described how Child K was in her father’s arms she she passed away. Her death was confirmed at 5.28am.

Thursday, June 13 - 13:08John Scheerhout

Retired consultant paediatrician gives evidence​

The first live witness of the day is Dr John Gibbs, a retired consultant paediatrician at the Countess of Chester Hospital, who describes to the jurors how a ventilator works, after watching two videos of a ventilator being operated and how its alarms work.
Dr Gibbs confirms that a nurse would fill in a chart when a baby is on a ventilator. He explains it would record oxygen saturation levels.
The doctor says it’s a ‘serious sign’ when oxygen levels in the blood drop.

Thursday, June 13 - 14:21John Scheerhout

Doctor's evidence continues​

Dr John Gibbs is continuing to give evidence. The doctor is being asked about baby collapses in general. Tiny alarms attached to babies record chest movements and will go off following no activity of 20 seconds, he said.
He describes what doctors can do to assist infants when oxygen levels fall below 90 per cent, referred to as apnea. One method is to simply tap the infant to encourage breathing and another is to place a bag over the mouth to force oxygen into the baby, the court hears.
The doctor is describing what a ‘collapse’ means medically for an infant, as they cannot fall.

Thursday, June 13 - 15:01John Scheerhout

Cheshire Police analyst gives evidence​

Cheshire Police analyst Kate Tyndall is now giving evidence.
She is being taken through a ‘sequence of events’ chart concerning Child K. The officer confirms the defendant conducted a series of Facebook searches of other infants who collapsed and their parents, following analysis of Letby’s phone.
The officer confirms she has included summaries of Child K’s clinical notes into the sequence of event chart.

Thursday, June 13 - 15:43John Scheerhout

Cheshire Police analyst outlines series of messages between Letby and her colleagues​

Ms Tyndall outlines a series of messages between the defendant and colleagues. The officer confirms she also included the names of all the staff who were on duty at the relevant times in the chart.
The officer is now being taken through the timeline, with Letby said to have recorded notes for another child at 2am.
The jurors hear the medical notes confirm Child K was born at 25 weeks’ gestation when she weighed 692g. Her condition was ‘dusky and floppy’ and her heart rate was recorded as 60 beats per minute. It had been a ‘spontaneous labour’.
At 2.45am observations were recorded in the medical notes for Child K, the jurors are told.
At 2.50am the defendant made a nursing note for another baby, the court hears. By 3am a prescription was made for Child K and three minutes later a ‘blood gases record’ was entered for her.

Thursday, June 13 - 16:05John Scheerhout

Arrangements were being made for the baby to be transferred​

The jurors hear that by 3.15am arrangements were being made for the transfer of Child K to Arrowe Park Hospital. At 3.30am Letby recorded observations for another child, the officer confirmed. Prosecutor Nick Johnson KC said we were now approaching ‘the critical time’.
Observations were taken of Child K by another nurse at 3.30am, the jurors are told. A sample of blood was also taken a minute later.

Thursday, June 13 - 16:05KEY EVENT

Trial adjourned until Monday​

The trial is adjourned and resumes at 12.30pm on Monday.
 
Monday 17th June 2024

Live updates from Manchester Evening News - link Lucy Letby retrial updates as ex-nurse accused of murder attempt

Monday, June 17 - 12:10John Scheerhout

Evidence from police analyst continues​

The trial has resumed and the jurors are continuing to hear evidence from Cheshire Police analyst Kate Tyndall, who is taking the court through a sequence of events chart with questions from prosecutor Nick Johnson KQ.

Monday, June 17 - 12:45John Scheerhout

Jurors shown prescription documents and child's X-ray​

The jurors are shown a document concerning a prescription for morphine. The officer agrees that there will be evidence later in the trial that the signature is not from the nurse it purports to belong to.
The jurors are shown two prescriptions for Child K signed by a nurse and countersigned by Lucy Letby.
Three updates were made on the computer records for the infant’s medication, the jurors are told. A ‘pathology sample’ was also taken.
Letby recorded entries concerning another baby at around 5am, the jurors are told. Another note on the record refers to photos being taken of Baby K, which the jurors are told accords with evidence given by Baby K’s mother last week.
Child K was later given medication to help her lungs, the jurors are told. At 5.50am, samples were collected from the infant for analysis, the court is told, but nothing was said to have been detected from these samples.
A handover note from Dr Ravi Jayaram touches on the intention to move Child K to a specialist hospital, the jurors are told. The transport team enters a note on the system of a call from Dr Jayaram which mentions the infant dislodging a team [my note - tube?].
A detailed update from Lucy Letby is then made on an admission form for Child K, the jurors are told. The jurors are shown a copy of an x-ray of Child K.
At 6.25am Letby and another nurse made an entry on the system concerning an infusion of saline, the court is told.
Later at 6.37am Letby recorded herself giving medication to two other infants, the officer confirms to the jury.
It was then confirmed that Child K would be transferred to the specialist Arrowe Park Hospital in Birkenhead.
The jurors are told a note from Dr Jayaram had recorded that an endotracheal tube had gone into Child K’s mouth to a depth of 10 cm rather than the usual depth of 8.5cm.

Monday, June 17 - 13:05John Scheerhout

Jurors hear evidence relating to Child K's transfer​

An ambulance was booked to transfer Child K and another x-ray was taken of the infant to confirm the position of the endotracheal tube, the officer confirms. The ambulance arrived at 8.05am and the transport team arrived at 8.50am and were given a handover by Dr Jayaram, the jurors are told.
The parents of Child K were given an update and more observations of their baby were taken at 9.30am, the court hears. At 10am, notes from the transport team record details of her treatment including that she was being given 90 per oxygen.
The jurors hear Lucy Letby then sent a text to a nurse colleague which said: “Hope you had a good shift and are well away in the land of nod now.”
At 10.50am more notes catalogue the medicines being administered to Child K, the court hears.
At 11.10am, the transport team notes also record the medication and quantities, the court is told. At noon Child K was moved into a transport incubator.
The parents saw their baby go into the ambulance and depart for Arrowe Park Hospital, the officer confirms. She arrived at 1.15pm. Her mother left the Countess of Chester for Arrowe Park when she was discharged at 2pm.

Monday, June 17 - 13:17John Scheerhout

Court hears text exchange between Letby and colleague​

The jurors heard that Lucy Letby texted a colleague at 5.48pm: “That 25-weeker delivered so fairly busy.”
Some three-and-a-half hours later, after there had been no reply, Letby texted the nurse: “Everything OK. Not like you not to text back lol.”
The nurse colleague replied ‘oh sorry lol’ and in another message said: “25-weeker gone out now? x”
Letby was said to have replied: “Yeah but not until 2 ish and very unstable.”
The jurors were told that the defendant made a series of searches on Facebook concerning the babies she is convicted of attacking. In another search, said to have been conducted two years and two months after Child K was transferred out of the Countess of Chester Hospital, the defendant is alleged to have searched the surname of Child K.

Monday, June 17 - 14:35John Scheerhout

Trial resumes​

The trial has resumed after lunch and Ms Tyndall is asked by the prosecutor about the records the defendant was making around the time of the alleged attack.
She was making notes for two babies for whom she was the designated nurse in room one and another baby in room two whose designated nurse was another nurse, the jurors are told.

Monday, June 17 - 14:47John Scheerhout

Police analyst concludes her evidence​

Between 3pm and 3.30pm, the officer confirmed the defendant made notes about the two babies in her care.
Ben Myers KC, representing Letby, is now asking questions.
The barrister asks about an entry in the sequence of events concerning another nurse, Caroline Oakley, and the removal of a breathing tube, or ‘self-extubation’, from another baby. The officer said the information in the entry came from the intensive care chart.
The KC refers the officer to the nursing notes and the intensive care chart for the baby on February 17.
The officer confirms how the notes were used to inform the sequence of events chart. That brings her evidence to an end.

Monday, June 17 - 15:26John Scheerhout

Court hears evidence from hospital obstetrician and gynaecologist​

Dr Sara Brigham, a consultant obstetrician and gynaecologist at the Countess of Chester Hospital, is sworn in. She confirms she has no recollection of Child K or her mother.
She confirmed she and other consultants would ‘oversee’ the care of premature babies, and that included Child K.
Questioned by junior prosecutor Simon Driver, Dr Brigham confirms an entry taken by a midwife contains a brief history of Child K’s mother.
The witness explained a note on the case reported she was 25 weeks into her pregnancy. Dr Brigham said the note was written by a junior doctor and she said she reviewed it and the patient.
Dr Brigham confirmed she concluded Child K’s mother had entered ‘pre-term labour’ which is a phrase used to describe unborn infants before 37 weeks gestation.
The plan was to transfer the mother to a more advanced ‘tertiary neonatal unit’, she said. The original plan to transfer was postponed because it was feared she may deliver in the ambulance, said Dr Brigham.
When she returned to work the following day, on February 16, the doctor confirmed she completed her morning rounds, and saw Child K’s mother at 9.20am. She confirmed she read the patient’s notes.
Dr Brigham said the note of the ward round was signed by a junior doctor. The mother was ‘advanced in labour’ and the plan was to ‘await events’, according to the witness.
A note timed just before 1am on February 17 recorded the ringing of an emergency bell, the jurors are told. The witness said she was not in the hospital at the time but that there was discussion about whether to break the waters, although they broke of their own accord a few minutes later.
The infant was delivered at 2.12am.

Monday, June 17 - 15:39John Scheerhout

Decision not to transfer patient was 'correct', court hears​

Questioned by Ben Myers KC, for Letby, Dr Brigham agreed it would have been risky to send the patient to a specialist hospital in Preston.
Notes dated February 15 suggested there was a ‘decision made’ not to transfer her at that earlier stage in the pregnancy, the jurors are told.
Child K was actually born 35 hours later. Dr Brigham said the decision not to transfer then was correct because of the characteristics of that pregnancy which meant that delivery could happen ‘at any time’.

Monday, June 17 - 16:10John Scheerhout

Child K would have been subject to almost continual treatment, court hears​

Yvonne Griffiths, a registered nurse at the Countess of Chester Hospital, is the next witness. She tells the jury staff work a 12-hour shift, one during the day and the other overnight.
Ms Griffiths, who confirmed she was not personally involved in the care of Child K and her mother, is asked about nursing notes which are initialled by colleagues including the defendant. Babies such as Child K would be subject to almost continual treatment, Ms Griffiths agreed.
The witness also describes what details are entered on an intensive care chart.
A formula guides the amount of medication given to a baby based on its weight, she said.


Monday, June 17 - 16:15John Scheerhout

Witness answers questions on maternity unit shifts​

Questioned by Ben Myers KC, the witness confirms she was the deputy unit manager at the maternity unit. Ms Griffiths said babies needed to be monitored continuously. She agreed infants could deteriorate quickly.
The witness agreed a baby’s heart rate could suddenly slow.
Asked if handling can cause physical distress to babies, Ms Griffiths answered ‘yes’. The witness said nurses tried not to handle babies and allow the equipment to take measurements.
The witness agreed the shifts start at 7.30 in the morning and in the evening when nurses are told which babies they are allocated before they go to the cot-side to receive another handover from the nurse who is finishing their shift.
The witness agreed that some tasks, for instance giving medication, require two nurses.
Ms Griffiths said nurses would sometimes ask colleagues to keep an eye on a baby if they had another task to fulfil but only if the infant was stable and in the ‘short term’.
She agreed with the KC that nurses relied on being able to help each other.

Monday, June 17 - 16:47KEY EVENT

Trial adjourns for the day​

Ms Griffiths agrees there was nothing strange about a nurse moving from one nursery to another to help a colleague.
Asked to look at a photo of the maternity unit, the witness confirmed drugs were kept in a white cupboard.
Ms Griffiths said at the time morphine was kept in syringes in a refrigerator ready for use.
The administration of drugs was recorded electronically, she agreed.
The witness is asked to look at a computer record for medication for Child K. The barrister said the exercise was to familiarise the court with how the record worked rather than make any points about the care of Child K.
Asked how incidents were reported on the unit, Ms Griffiths said there was an online system called Datix to record any oversights or errors where doctors or nurses could record any matters of concern.
The trial is adjourned for the day and resumes at 10.30am tomorrow (Tuesday).
 
Monday 17th June 2024

Live updates from Chester Standard - link Recap: Lucy Letby trial, Monday, June 17 - prosecution continues its case

9:44am
On Thursday, jurors at Manchester Crown Court heard a statement read out on behalf of the mother of Child K. Child K’s mother wiped away tears as she sat in court with her husband, while Letby followed proceedings from the dock flanked by three security guards.
Here is a round-up of what the courtroom heard that day: Jurors hear from mother of premature baby allegedly attacked by Lucy Letby

9:44am
Today's court hearing is due to begin at noon.

12:02pm
The courtroom is filling up, and Lucy Letby has entered court.

12:04pm
The trial is now resuming, with jury members taking their places.

12:09pm
Analyst Kate Tyndall is talking through the sequence of events, presented electronically in a 302-tile presentation. Each juror has an electronic copy of this.
The sequence of events includes timestamped details of clinical records, staff movements in the hospital, medicine administration, text messages and significant events in relation to Child K.
It also notes which clinical staff has recorded medical notes.

12:36pm
The sequence is presented in chronological order. Clinical notes which are written retrospectively are placed at appropriate points in the timeline. For example, notes written at about 8am, which record what happened at 6am, are placed in the sequence at 6am.

12:50pm
The sequence includes a text message sent to Lucy Letby following her night shift on February 16-17, 2016. It was sent by a nursing colleague and says: 'Hope you had a good shift and are well away in the land of nod now!'
At the time, medication is being administered to Child K as efforts are made to transport the baby girl from the Countess of Chester Hospital (a level 2 centre at the time) to Arrowe Park Hospital (a level 3 centre). The jury previously heard a level 3 centre provides the highest level of care for babies born extremely prematurely.

1:01pm
The sequence comes to its closing stages, where it records Child K was transferred to Arrowe Park Hospital and treated there from 1.15pm on February 17. The baby girl's mother was also transported to the hospital.
Child K died on February 20.

1:03pm
The court is shown Lucy Letby made Facebook searches for the parents of babies she has since been convicted of murdering and attempting to murder.
She made a search for the surname of Child K on Facebook on April 20, 2018.

1:05pm
The court is now adjourning for a lunch break.

2:19pm
Analyst Kate Tyndall talks through some additional documents which the jury have in their document collection.
It includes all of Lucy Letby's recorded duties and the location of all babies on the neonatal unit on the morning of February 17, 2016.
Prosecutor Nicholas Johnson explains the purpose of the entries is so it can record where the neonatal unit nurse was at various points throughout her shift.

2:23pm
Entries highlighted are all events concerning Child K, such as the admission to the neonatal unit, communication with parents, observations and infusion.
Initial entries do not have any Lucy Letby involvement, but Letby is later involved after Child K is admitted to the neonatal unit.

2:40pm
Benjamin Myers KC, for Letby's defence, asks to clarify a couple of matters with Mrs Tyndall.
One of them is for an intensive care record for a different baby in room 1 that night, whose designated nurse was Caroline Oakley. At 3.20am there is an entry, signed by Caroline Oakley, which reads '0320 self extubated ++ Neopuff+ peep -> [leading to] bipap 0340'.

2:43pm
Dr Sara Brigham, consultant obstetrician and gynaecologist at the Countess of Chester Hospital, is called to court to give evidence.
Prosecutor Simon Driver asks her if, from memory, she remembers Child K or her mother. Dr Brigham replies she does not.

2:55pm
Dr Brigham explains her role and duties within the hospital, which involve overseeing high-risk pregnancies.
She had reviewed the mother of Child K on February 15, and the plan was to administer a range of medication to 'slow down the process' as the mother presented in pre-term labour, and arrange for the mother to be transferred to a tertiary [level 3] centre.

2:56pm
Dr Brigham says the Countess of Chester Hospital accepted babies from 27 weeks gestation as a level 2 unit at the time, whereas level 3 centres 'optimally' accepted babies of 25 weeks gestation, which Child K was at this stage.

3:00pm
A Cheshire and Merseyside Perinatal Cot Bureau note records on February 15 that the planned transfer was 'cancelled...patient unstable to transfer'.
Dr Brigham says the risk was the patient would deliver in an ambulance as the labour was progressing. The chosen level 3 centre at this point would have been Preston.
She agrees it would be "preferable" for Child K to be born in a level 3 centre, but it was "better" for the baby to be born in a level 2 centre to the back of an ambulance.
She adds that pre-term labour "can be very unpredictable".

3:04pm
An examination of the mother on February 15 showed the mother's waters could "go at any stage".

3:13pm
Dr Brigham says it was important for pre-term labour babies not to spend too long in the womb.
It was noted on February 16 that the mother was in 'advanced labour', so the decision was made not to inhibit the process.
At 55 minutes past midnight on February 17, the emergency bell was rung. Dr Brigham notes the mother's waters broke at 1.52am.

3:17pm
Dr Brigham says the decision not to transfer Child K's mother to a tertiary centre was, in the circumstances, the "correct" one.
She says, even with hindsight, based on the clinical decision at the time, it was "the right decision" and she stands by her judgment.

3:21pm
Mr Myers, for Letby's defence, rises to ask about the transfer. Dr Brigham agrees that in an ideal world, the transfer would have taken place.
Mr Myers says that decision was made on the afternoon of February 15. He says, as it happened, Child K was not born for another 35 hours.
Dr Brigham says the mother was lying in a bed at the time, and the process of transfer - from the bed to an ambulance - could have caused the labour to progress. "Things can change very quickly".
Dr Brigham reiterates the decision not to transfer was "the right one". In Chester, the care was then 'optimised' for Child K's mother.

3:37pm
Nurse Yvonne Griffiths is the next to give evidence. She is currently ward manager at the Countess of Chester Hospital.
Mr Driver explains he is going to pick a few points from her witness statement and ask about those.

3:44pm
Ms Griffiths talks about the nursing skill levels, with higher levels able to work in intensive care and high dependency units at the neonatal unit.
She says it would be important to speak to the parents and get maternal history as soon as they could, once they were made aware it would be likely a very premature baby's birth was imminent.

3:51pm
Ms Griffiths confirms the electronic nursing records, with the initials 'LL' as their author, show it is Lucy Letby who has written them.

3:56pm
Ms Griffiths explains two nurses calculate the medicine infusion for babies together, with both signing the form. Mr Driver asks if that means there is a "safety net" [so babies aren't given the wrong dose of medicine]. Ms Griffiths agrees that is the case.

4:00pm
Mr Myers rises. He says at the time in 2016, Ms Griffiths was deputy ward manager.
Asked about the vulnerability of such babies in the neonatal unit as Child K, Ms Griffiths says: "They are just so fragile so you need to monitor them constantly."
Mr Myers says a desaturation is "not uncommon" in a neonate. Ms Griffiths agrees, and agrees that such desaturations can happen "within seconds".
She adds it's a "hands-off technique" for such neonates, as handling them could cause stress, and that is why they have electronic monitors.

4:04pm
Ms Griffiths agrees a nurse can wait to see if a baby 'self-corrects' when it desaturates, paying attention to the skin colour of the baby as an additional observation. If the situation does not resolve, then an intervention is necessary, Ms Griffiths agrees.

4:06pm
Mr Myers asks about nurses leaving babies alone. Ms Griffiths says that can be done if the baby is stable, and telling a nursing colleague if they are going to be absent 'for a short period of time'.

4:12pm
Ms Griffiths agrees with Mr Myers there is "nothing unusual" in going from one neonatal unit nursery room to another to help a nurse in another room, as is shown during Letby's night shift when she assists in room 1 of the unit [where Child K was].

4:14pm
One of those times where Letby assisted in room 1, Mr Myers says, was recorded before the arrival of Child K to the neonatal unit that night.

4:32pm
Mr Myers asks about the floorplan of the neonatal unit, including the layout of the nursing stations which can be used to update computerised medical records, and where morphine is stored.
He asks about a prescription for medicine administered to Child K. Ms Griffiths agrees that the time of the prescription recorded is not the time the medicine is actually administered.

4:36pm
Mr Myers asks how incidents are recorded on the unit.
Ms Griffiths replies it is via a 'Datix' system.
Mr Myers says that enables doctors or nurses to record concerns during the course of their duties. Ms Griffiths agrees.
The court hears the process is done online.
An example of such a Datix form is presented to the court.

4:38pm
Mr Myers says once one of those forms is completed, they can be raised with heads of department. Ms Griffiths agrees.
Mr Driver rises to clarify a couple of matters.

4:40pm
The 'self-correct' process, referred to in Mr Myers' questioning, is raised. Ms Griffiths says with a baby brand new to the unit, 'you would be aware of any desaturations'. She adds: "You would want to watch that carefully".
And with a baby of Child K's prematurity, they would be watched "very highly".

4:41pm
The judge apologises to the jury for overrunning, saying they would be normally finishing by 4.30pm, but witness availability required the court to overrun.
He reminds jurors not to research anything about the case or discuss it with anyone.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
105
Guests online
2,463
Total visitors
2,568

Forum statistics

Threads
602,350
Messages
18,139,462
Members
231,358
Latest member
IndigoMagnolia2
Back
Top