Same. Which is why I assumed abduction. But if someone knew she was leaving they could make sure the dog was OK? Hr leaving it off the lead would suggest not going of her own volition.
In your opinion perhaps. Theories may vary... Me I'm still open to various things..
It may well happen like that.
It reads as if it's two separate visits:
www.thesun.co.uk
The dog could have moved the harness.
That was my reading of it too.It reads as if it's two separate visits:
'
'They had already taken images from the day of her disappearance'
“These officers were different to the ones in uniform, they seemed very assertive.”
Officers in uniform on visit visit took footage and then 2nd visit - last Thursday - was the plain clothes police.
Two 'suspicious' men spotted by witness near Nicola Bulley's dog-walking route
A WITNESS told police he spotted two men acting suspiciously — close to Nicola Bulley’s dog-walk route the day before she disappeared. It came as cops took CCTV footage from a garage in St Michael’…
can you spot the camera?
Google Maps
Find local businesses, view maps and get driving directions in Google Maps.www.google.com
Completely agree. This part of the timeline must be very difficult for the family.
I thought this as well because to leave no evidence and it be so quick sounds really professional - like a hit job, no idea who would hire them.
IF this is financial related and these two 'suspicious' men were involved this may turn out to be much bigger.
I think tragic accident or highly planned abduction with more than one person, and would suspect someone that she knew or was familiar with on some level. No idea who.
why are they red herrings?
It has been explained before that the ‘Deep Hole’ warning sign attached to the tree by the bench is because the first few feet near the bank is shallow and rocky but in the centre of the river there it drops to 3-4 metres. My understanding from an interview with PF is that this hole has been searched more than once. It is possible that NB could have slipped or fell in for unknown reasons, lost footing on rocks and ended up struggling in the deep water. I still find it slightly implausible that the dog would not have gone in after her and also that the body would have then moved downstream fast enough for it not to be spotted. PF says that bodies tend to sink, in which case searching the hole and that area early on would have most likely found something but there’s nothing, so I am still of the view that an abduction from the top field is just as plausible a possibility as drowning.
Plus imo he won't even want to think of the river accident theory as there is only one outcome with that.
I mentioned above about the possibility of NB on the Teams call listening through headphones and wondering if this was the case, where are the headphones? I have just come across this photo showing NB with phone headphones. I think it is highly probable that if she was on the Teams call, video off, mute on, she most likely would have been listening through headphones as many people, including me, do when on a Teams work call. If this was the case, then I find it highly strange that if for some reason she had to enter the river, she would have left the phone on the bench and advanced to the river with her headphones in her ears. Wouldn't you leave both phone and headphones together...or is it just me that does that? Just my thoughts...
