Neither of those screenshots is the spot I'm talking about. The two figures are to the left of the lady in red, directly above the red gatepost. Once you see them, you can't unsee them. IMO.
Here's the link again:
Timeline of Nicola Bulley’s mysterious disappearance
Police have released a timeline of Nicola Bulley’s last known movementswww.independent.co.uk
I may have misheard but I thought he said something (on the TV) about it being not very deep right at the edge where rocks are but then it gets deeper around 3m but I may have misheard it.
Prob contour make up.
Because it isn't a high quality image and possibly lighting and her bone structure, then there will be no subtlety in shading. If you look at her ear, then you'll notice the same shading and not only have the police ruled out her partner and family as suspects, and stated so repeatedly, including warning people to leave them alone and stop pointing fingers...but if she had been bruised, as part of her description in searching for her, along with what she was wearing, hair colour, height etc then they would have mentioned this.
I'd love to know how "deep" that is. I've been searching for any clarification. I assume not so deep that divers and sonar didn't search it? I know there is a sign, but the water behind my house has a danger deep water sign, and an emergency ring and despite it raining all day today it has no water in it at all.
That would make sense yes. 2ft of very cold water when you are wearing winter clothes and nothing to grip on is not an easy thing to get out of. Given some local knowledge you might well try to walk along the edge looking for something to hold onto then slip into deeper water. Full body immersion in January is not going to be very good.
www.websleuths.com
Most likely still in her pocket.
I agree and there is also the possibility of the rocks causing an injury.
I agree, that’s why I asked earlier if it is possible that Mercedes might be able to track the location of the car keys.
I concur (JMO). Man facing camera, wearing short-sleeved light colouresd shirt and a darker vest/gilet talking to someone wearing dark clothing, with bare legs.Neither of those screenshots is the spot I'm talking about. The two figures are to the left of the lady in red, directly above the red gatepost. Once you see them, you can't unsee them. IMO.
Here's the link again:
Timeline of Nicola Bulley’s mysterious disappearance
Police have released a timeline of Nicola Bulley’s last known movements
Please search previous threads, I know you have good intentions, however, the little elves in this picture are really not there.
Mercedes won’t be able to remotely. It’s possible to detect a signal - but doubtful if you could through water and I imagine they are long destroyed (if she’s in the river).
If she fell in face first, and let's say the hood came over the top of her head, then that is going to create quite a sizeable air bubble over her that may not dissipate for quite some time. This could severely hinder her attempts to pull her face out of the water because to turn over onto her back she would have to submerge the clothing that is held buoyant by the trapped air. Never mind the cold/shock factor.
I remember this coming up in a thread before, so I'm not going through them all again! I was merely agreeing with the poster that I can see two people. They are on the other side of the road, some distance from the lady in red. This is obviously a still from a Ring doorbell, so is facing out over the road. Of course they are going to pick up people/animals at a distance just not distinctly. If it were of any relevance, I'm sure the police would have mentioned it by now. My opinion, no-one else's.
The divers were all helped out by at least one other person and they are fit individuals trained for the work not wearing winter clothing. Good point about the air bubble caused by the coat.
