That was the part I didn’t want to say out loud.Hopefully. But 23 days is a long time to be completely incognito.
That was the part I didn’t want to say out loud.Hopefully. But 23 days is a long time to be completely incognito.
Yes that’s where it looked like it had stopped earlier.The twitter helicopter video looks to be taken from Rawcliffe Road near Turnover Hall Farm caravan park (ETA facing west).
If correct, it seems a little odd indeed.Nicola is listed as a shareholder in one of PA's LTD companies (looking at Companies House website). Oddly enough, the address listed for her is not her home address, but appears to track to a static caravan at Larbreck Hall Caravan Park, which is off of Garstang Road. The address listed appears to contain a spelling mistake which is odd, as HMRC would use that address for correspondence.
If the family has connections to a caravan there I'm sure it has all been checked out, but it does seem a little odd.
Yes that’s where it looked like it had stopped earlier.
Sky are live from there now
It doesn’t look so strange IMO if you see the same address also features for other companies on Companies House with similar individuals involved. Probably a previous home address for NB that is not updated. Companies House is full of mistakes, and typos in addresses would be the least of it. Some people also do not give their actual home address for privacy reasons but somewhere else post would get to them.Nicola is listed as a shareholder in one of PA's LTD companies (looking at Companies House website). Oddly enough, the address listed for her is not her home address, but appears to track to a static caravan at Larbreck Hall Caravan Park, which is off of Garstang Road. The address listed appears to contain a spelling mistake which is odd, as HMRC would use that address for correspondence.
If the family has connections to a caravan there I'm sure it has all been checked out, but it does seem a little odd.
I‘ve been hesitating to say this but would you go near the edge of a river if you needed to be sick after some drinks the previous night?Two things about the phone. There is a stone plinth under the bench so it might have been there.
Secondly someone picking it up may well have cleaned it
I would say possibly had blood tests which showed liver problems. That would be a significant issue with alcohol but not a full blown hopeless alcoholic.
It's the sort of thing you might talk to other people about. So could be semi public knowledge at least in a small village..
Unlikely she would go down to the water's edge to re-apply her makeup.If a woman was described as faffing about I would think of things such as using a mirror to ensure the makeup was okay, rummaging around in handbag etc.
IMO in the images published of the missing person she does appear to use a lot of makeup.
Well, if they are, they sure are notifying him/her that he shouldn't come back there. LOL LOL MOO MOO MOOWonder if they are looking for a perp? Maybe been waiting for someone to return to the area?
I think it was a ploy by somebody who is quite clever.The basic thing I can't see with an abduction is why the phone was not simply thrown in the water.
Possible reason would be if it was dropped IF the missing person was jumped on from behind the shed and it was too awkward to go back and get it.
IMO "the phone moved towards the bench area" Is very intriguing language. Almost like police know something happened like it being dropped but can't quite get enough data to show details.