I think they said/meant that they hadn't found any signs of those things.Police were clear from the beginning that there were no suspicious circumstances or third party involvement. How they knew that will hopefully be made clear now.
I think they said/meant that they hadn't found any signs of those things.Police were clear from the beginning that there were no suspicious circumstances or third party involvement. How they knew that will hopefully be made clear now.
If I recollect correctly, PA was told that Willow was going back and forth between the bench and the wooden stile which leads to the river path. If this IS the case, surely sniffer dogs were deployed to try and track whether Nicola had walked off in that direction, but we've not been given any specifics by Lancs Police.But the dog would have stayed where she fell in and it didn't.
It focused on being between the bench and the kissing gate.
Not the bench and the river.
That's assuming the dog saw her. Willow was off the lead, she knew the area and was comfortable there. It is quite possible Willow left Nicola at the bench and ran off exploring the field and bushes, comfortable knowing Nicola was at the bench and could return to her at anytime she liked.But the dog would have stayed where she fell in and it didn't.
It focused on being between the bench and the kissing gate.
Not the bench and the river.
Police were clear from the beginning that there were no suspicious circumstances or third party involvement. How they knew that will hopefully be made clear now.
How does a father tell a 6 and 9 year old that Mommy is no longer lost but gone forever?
Unimaginable.
MOO.
Good post. Yes, no one wants to be a "conspiracy theorist." However, in percentages, even if it is one, two, or three percent chance of a crime, acknowledging those percentages help shape a more accurate assessment model. I believe, like you, the simplest answer might be the answer here, but we're not privy to most of the shaping the information, yet.I’m the last person who wants to fall down the conspiracist rabbit holes but I confess to thinking similar things. However I’m fairly confident Occam’s applies here.
The dog wouldn’t have followed her as she would have sunk. That’s even if the dog saw what happened.
I don’t understand why a (presumably) drowned body being found a mile or two downstream possibly snagged in undergrowth is suspicious. It is exactly what we would expect.
It's purely my opinion, but I think that they were able to surmise very early on that there weren't any factors that pointed to suicide. I base this on, amongst other things, Superintendent Riley's first (I think?) press conference; when she said that the most 'probable' event had been a slip or trip whilst in the process of re-harnessing the dog.Would they be able to tell the difference between accidental slip, intentional act or possible push if there was no obvious sign of a crime? Or would they rely on other evidence they already possess, eg recent internet searches, state of mind etc to make a best guess based on most likely scenario? Do they tend to assume accidental if no evidence for anything else (Eg toxicology).
I just hope the family gets the conclusive answers they deserve.
But that doesnt mean there was one, its human nature to not want to acknowledge that your loved one may have killed themselves or choosen to walk away from their life. It also allows for a bit of hope that she might still have been aliveI thought her partner's interview did suspect a third party. WHEN did the police state there were no suspicious circumstances.??
Would they be able to tell the difference between accidental slip, intentional act or possible push if there was no obvious sign of a crime? Or would they rely on other evidence they already possess, eg recent internet searches, state of mind etc to make a best guess based on most likely scenario? Do they tend to assume accidental if no evidence for anything else (Eg toxicology).
I just hope the family gets the conclusive answers they deserve.
Thinking about PA, why do you think he was so convinced that she wasn't in the river? Maybe bought into what PF said too much?
I doubt it. There are always people who revel in thinking up the most outlandish scenariosHopefully the worst of the conspiracies can be put to bed now.
Hopefully the worst of the conspiracies can be put to bed now.
Possibily in denial, possibly wanted to appear hopeful and strong for the kids.Thinking about PA, why do you think he was so convinced that she wasn't in the river? Maybe bought into what PF said too much?