I was under the impression that (maybe) first witness on scene with willow caught her running freely so she tied her up whilst she got help and of course went to her appointment. I don’t think the police are saying when they arrived the dog was free, it was the initial finding of the dog they are giving info on, so the witness account IMO.
You're right, I was confused thinking two different witnesses found Willow afterwards because of things I was remembering about this article:
Nicola Bulley, 45, disappeared while out on a dog walk last Friday morning after dropping her children at school in St Michael's-on-Wyre, Lancashire, before police launched a major search operation
www.mirror.co.uk
If there's any truth to this account, it makes leaving Willow unattended harder to understand IMO.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
'She went on to say
two other dog walkers later came across her phone and recognised the screensaver photo.
She said they were unable to unlock the phone and contacted a friend who then called St Michael's-on-Wyre Church of England Primary School, where Nicola had dropped her two children earlier that morning.
Partner Paul Ansell was contacted and raced to the scene from the family home three miles away in Inskip, before calling the police, the friend said. "As far as I’m aware, no one called the police until Paul arrived," she said.'
'She went on to say, the dog walker spotted Willow as she came through a gate onto the towpath but became suspicious when she saw the harness and lead on the floor.
A man then came through behind her with his dog and spotted the phone.
"The gent has looked on the floor and two feet from the bench there’s a phone," she said."' (BBM)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
So there were two people together who found Willow, and neither of them stayed with her or called the authorities? I presume some things got lost in translation and that this is the initial witness who called her daughter.
I don't think any of the witnesses are suspicious or have anything to do with what transpired but I find this discrepancy confusing. Is this just bad journalism/a jumbled account from the friend? Or was there more than one person? The latest updates on this case suggest that the woman was on her own.
Can anyone shed any light? Because I'm just in a muddle now.