UK - Nurse Lucy Letby Faces 22 Charges - 7 Murder/15 Attempted Murder of Babies #11

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
11:34am

Child L's blood sugar reading at 4pm is 1.5.
Child M's collapse is recorded at this time. A crash call is put out.
Friends message Lucy Letby around this time, saying they can have "an unpacking party".
For Child L, the dextrose administration is increased to 12.5%, from 10%.
Child L's blood sugar reading at 5pm is 1.7, which was "still very low", the prosecution say.

11:38am

Letby's mother messages Letby at 5.28pm telling her: "You've won rule the world :-D *advertiser censored*"
Child L's blood sugar reading at 6pm is 1.9.
Letby responds to a colleague at 6.01pm: "Haha why not!! Work has been s***e but...I have just won £135 on Grand National!!"
She also sent a group message: "Unpacking party sounds good to me with the flavoured vodka...Just won the Grand National!"

 
11:44am

The pathology records the lab specimen of a blood sample for Child L. Among the blood test results sought for the sample are insulin and C-peptide.
The insulin level is recorded as 1,099, and the C-peptide is recorded as 264. These readings are entered into the system on April 14, having obtained the results from Liverpool.
The C-peptide "should be 5-10 times the level of insulin", but the ratio is recorded as 0.2.

11:46am

Child L is recorded to have hypoglacaemia [low blood sugar].
Doctors record the hypoglacaemia continued despite the regular infusions of dextrose throughout the day.

11:50am

Child L has a blood sugar reading of 2.0 at 8pm.
Child L's blood sugar at 9pm is 2.4.
Letby records notes for Child M at 9.22pm.

LIVE: Lucy Letby trial, Wednesday, February 15
 
Replying to
@MerseyHack
On the day Ms Letby allegedly tried to murder Baby L she sent a message to her mother asking if her father could place a bet for her on any grey horses running in that day’s Grand National.

https://twitter.com/MerseyHack
Andy Gill
@MerseyHack


She also on that day exchanged messages with colleagues about them visiting her in her new house. In one she wrote “Got a magnum of Prosecco and vodka. Woop.”


At 1535 on the Saturday after Baby L was born, a blood sample was taken which, the Crown say, subsequently showed a very high reading for insulin in him.



Court hears that close to the time when a blood sample was taken from Baby L, his twin Baby M collapsed dramatically in the neonatal unit. Nurse Letby also faces a charge that she attempted to murder Baby M, which she denies.

https://twitter.com/MerseyHack
Andy Gill
@MerseyHack
·

Insulin results from the blood sample taken from Baby L were not available until 5 days after the sample was taken. The insulin level recorded was at the upper limit of the capacity of the laboratory machine to measure insulin.
 
12:13pm

Child L's blood sugar reading at 10pm is 2.3.
A colleague of Letby, Belinda Simcock, messages her at 10.11pm: "Thanks for listening, I'm ok x"
Letby: "Don't need to thank me, glad you felt able to tell me..."
Child L's blood sugar reading at midnight is 2.1, and remains "low" at 2.1 at 2am.
A long line is inserted, with an x-ray taken, and medication administered.
The blood sugar reading at 4am is 2.3, and 2.2 at 6am.
The glucose is further increased, but the blood sugar reading "remains stubbornly low" at 2.2 at 7am.
It remains at 2.2 at 9am.
Letby reeives a message from Yvonne Farmer asking if she wanted to do more overtime shifts on Sunday night, Monday day or Monday night, appreciating she may be tired, with Letby responding: "Sorry but need some days off now."
She adds she could be on call for nights, and would be free for Thursday day/night shifts.
Child L's blood sugar reading at 2pm on Sunday had "normalised" at 3.0.

12:16pm

Letby refers to her previous shifts as "not nice" in a message to Jennifer Jones-Key.
Jennifer Jones-Key says Letby 'hasn't got many nights' coming up on the rota, adding she likely won't see Letby as she works mainly nights herself.
"We never see each other if we do work together as always mad shifts".

12:26pm

Child L was still receiving 15% dextrose through the afternoon of Sunday.
A nursing note made by Laura Eagles that afternoon records: "Blood sugars maintained...remains on 15% dextrose via long line...very unsettled at times."
The family had been kept updated of the situation, according to a family communication note.
Child L's blood sugar levels were "normal" at 2.8 at 5pm.
Samantha O'Brien becomes the designated nurse that night for Child L, and the 15% dextrose administration continues through the night.
The blood sugar levels are 2.7 at 9pm, 2.9 at 11pm, 2.7 at 2am.
Samantha O'Brien, in her nursing note, records: "...1% glucose infusing via long line in left leg,. 3 hourly blood sugars, all have been above 2.6 so far this shift. Plan to continue [current medication administration]...
"Baby unsettled at times, settles with comfort measures."
The blood sugar level is 2.9 at 5am on Monday, April 11.
Letby messages a colleague at 8.45am, saying: "The unit is in dire way with staff," highlighting which trained staff were on duty and who else was on in the last shift, and who was off at that time.
A colleague replies, in her message: "that's terrible"
Letby replies the overall situation was "not good", "mad and poor skill mix".

12:31pm

Child L's blood sugar readings are 2.8 at 11am.
Dr Huw Mayberry, in a clinical note, records the feeds/fluids for Child L, which were increased due to low blood sugar and falling sodium levels.
Child L's blood sugar at 3pm is 3.5, remaining at 3.5 at 5pm.
Nurse Belinda Simcock said registar Mayberry was aware of the 3.5 readings, and if they continued to remain above three, then feeds would be increased.
The blood sugar increases to 4.7 at 7pm.

12:32pm

Child L continued to be cared for at the hospital's neonatal unit until May 3, and was then discharged.

12:36pm

The court is now hearing a statement from the mother of Child L and Child M, who had had a "routine pregnancy" until a stage when she was "not well".
She recalls being "surprised and shocked" at being told she had to be admitted to hospital.
She stayed there for 15-17 days and was asked if she was going to deliver naturally or via a C-section. Staff had looked through her file and were "worried", so the decision was made for the birth to take place, via c-section, on April 8.
The babies, weighing 3lb each, looked "very nice".
The family were taken to the neonatal unit to see them in room 1 the following day and the family were "happy", and at that time it was not known what they were going to be called - deciding on the names a week later.

 
12:39pm

Later, the mother was asked by a nurse named Yvonne to come down as soon as possible. She came down and saw Child M had collapsed and chest compressions were under way.
She was praying to see her, asking God to see them. Child L was ok on the other side of the room, and Lucy Letby was present.
She said her mind was "totally blank" and she just prayed.
After what felt like "hours", Child M had stabilised.
Each day, the mother would come down daily to see the twins, who had stabilised.
Three weeks later, the mother was discharged, and she continued to visit daily until the twin boys were discharged. They hadn't put much weight on and were small, but otherwise healthy.
Child M had "no after effects for what happened to him".

12:44pm

A statement from the father is now being read out. He said he was "shocked" at the news his wife needed to go to hospital due to concerns over the pregnancy, and she stayed there for "over two weeks" before the C-section birth took place.
The doctor said the babies looked "very healthy" before being taken to the neonatal unit by Lucy Letby and another nurse.
He saw the twins a couple of hours later and they were "both still fine".
The following day, the family visited - "we were both proud parents, and very happy".
Within 10 minutes of being on the ward, the father "rushed" back to the neonatal unit, where he saw a doctor doing chest compressions on Child M.
He said: "It was a very distressing image, and one that still is in my mind."
The staff said they didn't know what had happened to Child M, and Child M had had a heart attack.
Child M later stabilised after about half an hour, and there were no further issues with the twins in subsequent care.
Child M had a brain scan, with 'no damage' recorded.
The twins were "only on the unit because they didn't weigh enough", and it was "a relief to get the boys home".

12:47pm

A statement from the midwife is now being read out to the court.
She said there was concern one of the twins was not growing as he should have in the womb, so an elective surgery took place so there were no further complications with the lack of growth.
Both babies "were in good condition" and there was time for "a quick cuddle" with the parents before the twins were taken to the neonatal unit "without any problems".

12:49pm

Both twins began crying after birth, one of them requiring a little extra help to do so.
The 'Apgar score', which records the conditions of the babies shortly after birth, recorded 10/10 scores for both twins at 10 minutes after birth.
Child M has a low oxygen saturation rate, but he had that rectified with breathing support.

12:57pm

Dr Sudeshna Bhowmik, who was working as a paediatric trainee at the time in April 2016 at the Countess of Chester Hospital, has been called to give evidence.
She says, outside of the clinical notes, she has no memory of the twins, Child L and Child M.
She confirms, from the notes, she was present at the birth of the twins, citing an IV line for Child L on April 8 at 11.15am, which was "quite a routine procedure to be done on the neonatal unit".
The baby was "generally well", although the breathing rate was "a little elevated".
The court hears that was not a concern as that would usually be the case for babies born via C-section.
The weight of 1.465kg [3lb 3oz] was "quite low", and the blood sugar of 1.9 was "a little bit low", which can be found in premature babies who are quite small.
With glucose feeds, that would "stabilise".

1:00pm

The plan was to commence dextrose via IV fluids and feeds via expressed breast milk, to see if the latter would be tolerated 'in small amounts'.
She added at that time, there was no need to administer antibiotics. Dr Bhowmik tells the court with Child M showing signs of jaundice, however, that plan may need to have been revisited.
The plan was also to repeat the blood sugars in half an hour.

 
Last edited:
@Dotta On the previous thread you mentioned the "Trust me, I'm a nurse" comment - where is this? I can't find it anywhere but I've seen it referenced a lot.
 
Also, I'm a little confused. Reading tattle it states for Baby L:
"Letby came on duty that day at 7.30am.
By this time, the prosecution say, Letby was supposed only to be working day shifts because the consultants were concerned about the correlation between her presence and unexpected deaths and life-threatening episodes on the night-shifts."

Whereas today's report states:
"Letby reeives a message from Yvonne Farmer asking if she wanted to do more overtime shifts on Sunday night, Monday day or Monday night, appreciating she may be tired, with Letby responding: "Sorry but need some days off now."

Have I missed something here or gotten totally lost? If there were concerns why was she being offered multiple night shifts?
 
Also, I'm a little confused. Reading tattle it states for Baby L:
"Letby came on duty that day at 7.30am.
By this time, the prosecution say, Letby was supposed only to be working day shifts because the consultants were concerned about the correlation between her presence and unexpected deaths and life-threatening episodes on the night-shifts."

Whereas today's report states:
"Letby reeives a message from Yvonne Farmer asking if she wanted to do more overtime shifts on Sunday night, Monday day or Monday night, appreciating she may be tired, with Letby responding: "Sorry but need some days off now."

Have I missed something here or gotten totally lost? If there were concerns why was she being offered multiple night shifts?
Your post might be deleted for the reference to tattle. My advice is to use tattle to obtain quotes that relate to articles and then quote the article’s on here as the source material. For instance.

“Nicholas Johnson KC, prosecuting, said: “By this time Lucy Letby was supposed only to be working day shifts because the consultants were concerned about the correlation between her presence and unexpected deaths and life-threatening episodes on the night shifts.”


tattle has a good organised database but it’s gossip section allows anything unlike ws which is considered the gold standard, I wouldn’t quote directly from it or it’s gossip section.

I believe this unit had a very short list of staff available as it was understaffed in accordance to the regulations, if it was short staffed of lower experienced nurses you can assume safely it would also be understaffed with highly qualified staff like LL. she was considered a top tier nurse qualified to look after the sickest babies. If that is the case the unit might not be able to care for babies in the icu or room 1 on some nights without her. So on the nights without any top tier nurses she was often asked to do extra shifts. I presume this is the case here.

“Fellow nurse Christopher Booth, who was on duty on both nightshifts, told Mr Myers that Letby had completed an overtime shift that week.

He said: “That was not unusual for her. She was very conscientious.”

Mr Myers went on: “Was she someone willing to work extra or have shifts changed at short notice?”

“Yes,” replied Mr Booth.”



The Countess of Chester had a "lack of technical medical skills", accepted babies with too high a level of care need, and on occasion was "too busy".

He points to the fact that the hospital was "downgraded" by a clinical watchdog, and redesignated to a level one. He says the hospital "could not provide care at the level it did".

"If others have failed to provide appropriate care or the unit is too busy or not appropriately staff you may agree that creates a situation in which things can go wrong... mistakes made, records not kept," he tells the jury.

 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
58
Guests online
2,057
Total visitors
2,115

Forum statistics

Threads
602,424
Messages
18,140,313
Members
231,384
Latest member
lolofeist
Back
Top