Not sure how others are feeling about the case of Baby N, but at this point I feel entirely unconvinced that LL (or anyone) did anything untoward. The first allegation seems to centre on the baby “screaming”, but there’s really nothing to suggest what the alleged trauma was or that it was LL who did it. The baby had other desaturations which were deemed normal.
Two weeks pass, and then we’re onto the next allegation. Which seems to be that LL thrust something into the baby’s throat to cause a bleed, in a split second of appearing in the room to start her day shift? But there were clearly issues with intubating the baby, they’d been trying since 4am, plus he had a blood clotting disorder. So the idea that LL stealthily caused this throat trauma seems really far fetched to me.
The offer of baptism, I don’t find it that compelling personally. Previously there was a baby deliberately kept alive to wait for a priest. Kind of feels like if there’s a chance something might happen to a baby, give the parents the choice asap. Better to have the choice than be left with regrets.
This haemophilia case was another one I anticipated would be strong (the other being baby k), but does not appear to be ‘living up to’ their respective opening speeches. JMO.
