Sorry I don't know how this is going to land but I've had a real shitter of a day and a lot of this is extremely triggering. My heart breaks for these families.
The more I read anything from the doctors along the lines of 'it would never have occurred to me that a nurse would be attacking babies', the angrier I get. That's why we have safeguarding, right? If you provide care for vulnerable people - in this case poorly babies - then you have a duty of care to prevent them coming to harm.
When it is clear to you that the babies in your care are coming to harm, it is your job to consider all the possibilities - including staff negligence or malice. That isn't to say they are your only options, but you need to be open to considering them, right? Otherwise that is such an obvious way a child is going to come to harm?
Surely it's the same with teachers? Ideally, a teacher would never need to suspect another of harming a child but we all know we do not live in that world.
I understand that the Trust aren't the ones on trial here, and should the jury find LL guilty then none of this mitigates what she has done, but I feel so angry that the safety and wellbeing of these babies is being so readily dismissed. I hope this features somewhere in Myres closing statement. When RJ and his colleagues had their discussions, what was actually said? Where are the emails that were sent to the Head of Nursing and then... was it the Medical Director? I can't remember.
And why only the Head of Nursing in the first instance? I assume because their suspicions either were that it was a problem with LL either negligently or perhaps within the wider nursing staff? It's really difficult to work out what LL's colleagues made of her - it seems like she did have a close knit group of friends who regularly checked in on each other and used each other for emotional support (LL mostly on the receiving end), and sometimes we might think she's seen as driven, competent and capable through some of her interactions with the drs praising her, but then other times we hear that there are some that feel she might be out of her depth and seem worried about the care she is giving to the sicker babies (this is just my inference).
Again, I think we need to see exactly what RJ said to the Head of Nursing, and what she said 'probably not, let's see' to. Because is that actually what she said? When babies were dying? Let's see. (I will edit if I have misrememberd). I could go on and on but my heart is so broken. I have no idea if LL is guilty. But I do believe that if I am to believe what the prosecution say, then yes she is guilty of something I will never, ever be able to comprehend - but we are also here because so many people failed to protect those babies and their families.
JMO - mods delete if too aggy - sorry everyone x
www.chesterstandard.co.uk
www.independent.co.uk
