UK - Nurse Lucy Letby Faces 22 Charges - 7 Murder/15 Attempted Murder of Babies #3

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Pros, re what Lucy Letby wrote in medical notes: "It is almost as if she was seeking to create a documentary alibi in the notes of other babies. We suggest, a cynical and fairly sophisticated way of making the notes appear as if she had nothing to do with what was going on".
Prosecution: "When she went home that night Lucy Letby was worrried, She must have got the impression that people had become suspicious of what she was doing. She texted a colleague late at night, and asked 'do I need to be worried about what (a doctor) was asking'?"


Jury told that other than 3 days the following week, that was the last time (June 2016) that Lucy Letby worked in the neonatal unit at
@TheCountessNHS
 
Christ, that was unexpected.

"On another piece of paper, she wrote: 'I don’t deserve to live. I killed them on purpose because I’m not good enough”.

“'I am a horrible evil person' and in capital letters, 'I AM EVIL I DID THIS'.

"That, in a nutshell," Mr Johnson tells the court, "is your case
 
“On another piece of paper, she wrote: 'I don’t deserve to live. I killed them on purpose because I’m not good enough”.

“'I am a horrible evil person' and in capital letters, 'I AM EVIL I DID THIS'.

"That, in a nutshell," Mr Johnson tells the court, "is your case."

Oh. My. Good. Lord. Sickening, god knows how the defence will ‘defend’ this.
Well. That’s rather surprising.
 
11:33am

Medical expert Dr Dewi Evans said Child Q's collapse was due to 'inappropriate care', and he had been injected with air via the NGT.
The significant amount of air aspirated from his stomach 'could not have arisen in any other way'.
Dr Sandie Bohin noted Child Q was well up until June 25 and believed something happened between 9am and his collapse.
He was only being fed what Dr Bohin describes as “tiny” amounts of milk yet he had taken in “copious amounts of air” from the NGT. This was abnormal.
The effect of a large volume of air in the stomach would “squash” the lungs leading to desaturation and instability. Although a baby may recover quickly after such an event, he may remain unstable for some time thereafter.
She agreed with Dr Evans’ conclusion that events were consistent with the introduction of a large amount of air via the NGT.
A professor reviewed brain imaging of Child Q taken in November 2019 - more than three years later. He found evidence of abnormalities which whilst they were not diagnostic of him having suffered a brain injury as a result of being given excessive air and liquid via his NGT, they could be explained.

11:34am

In Letby's home search, officers recovered the handover sheet from the morning of June 25 whic included Child Q's name. This was a document which should not have left the hospital.
When interviewed by police, Letby agreed Child Q had been well enough for her to leave him on the morning of June 25.
When asked about the excess air aspirated from his stomach, she suggested babies sometimes gulp air when they vomit. She denied putting excess air down the NGT.

11:37am

Mr Johnson: "Following those events, the consultants suspected that the deaths and life-threatening collapses of these 17 children were not medically explicable and were the result of the actions of Lucy Letby.
"No doubt they were acutely aware that making such an allegation against a nurse was as serious as it gets.
"They, at the time, did not have the benefit of the evidence that you will hear and the decision was taken by the hospital took the decision to remove Lucy Letby from a hands-on role. She was moved to clerical duties where she would not come into contact with children.
"The police were contacted and began a very lengthy and complex enquiry.
"This involved the police contacting independent paediatricians and other specialists to review many cases which had passed through the NNU at the CoCH. Following that review, the decision was taken to arrest Lucy Letby – the first arrest came in July 2018.
"On July 3 she was arrested at her home, where the house was searched.
"In addition to some of the paperwork, they found sme other interesting items.
"There were some Post-it notes with closely written words on them, some of which included the names of some of her colleagues.
"On some of the notes were phrases such as “Why/how has this happened – what process has led to this current situation. What allegations have been made and by who? Do they have written evidence to support their comments?"

11:37am

"In her writings, she expressed frustration at the fact that she was not being allowed back on the neonatal unit and wrote 'I haven’t done anything wrong and they have no evidence so why have I had to hide away?'
"Her notes also expressed concern for the long-term effects of what she feared was being alleged against her and there are also many protestations of innocence."

11:39am

"On another piece of paper, she wrote: 'I don’t deserve to live. I killed them on purpose because I’m not good enough”.
“'I am a horrible evil person' and in capital letters, 'I AM EVIL I DID THIS'.
"That, in a nutshell," Mr Johnson tells the court, "is your case."

11:40am

That is the conclusion of the prosecution opening.
The defence, led by Benjamin Myers KC, will give a defence statement after a short adjournment.

 
“On another piece of paper, she wrote: 'I don’t deserve to live. I killed them on purpose because I’m not good enough”.

“'I am a horrible evil person' and in capital letters, 'I AM EVIL I DID THIS'.

"That, in a nutshell," Mr Johnson tells the court, "is your case."

Oh. My. Good. Lord. Sickening, god knows how the defence will ‘defend’ this.
I can only imagine the defence will run along the lines of mental distress following a placement in admin, suspecting or knowing of allegations etc. I find the less hysterical sounding ones fascinating. Almost as if there’s a conscious thought process to how she’s been clocked, what she could do better, what evidence there is etc (of course assuming the note is related to guilt)
 
I can only imagine the defence will run along the lines of mental distress following a placement in admin, suspecting or knowing of allegations etc. I find the less hysterical sounding ones fascinating. Almost as if there’s a conscious thought process to how she’s been clocked, what she could do better, what evidence there is etc (of course assuming the note is related to guilt)
"I killed them on purpose" - I think that's quite a stretch to say she was feeling guilty that she might have failed them as a nurse.

What a bomb to drop.
 
I mean, it is possible to feel and express guilt about something for which you aren't guilty, but it is going to be tough to explain.

I imagine the defence will she she blamed herself and bring up mental health depression. Being over worked etc. But it's all the entire picture that doesn't look good for her, it's not just the confession note.
 
I think the prosecution have set out a very strong stall imo. That note at the end is explosive. Let’s see what angle the defence take next. Hard to believe this is only day 3/4 of 6 months. We still really haven’t even scratched the surface yet.
 
It is baffling to me that she was still texting colleagues to say she had done nothing wrong and was upset with the admin move, instead of being reflective and understand that with so many deaths/almost fatalities it was to be expected she'd be reviewed. That's just normal performance reviews and management in any profession. If a police officer kills one person, they know they'll be reviewed even in it's all clear at the end. Why would she not expect to be reviewed at some point???

That level of arrogance and callousness about her own performance is really distasteful.
 
"I killed them on purpose" - I think that's quite a stretch to say she was feeling guilty that she might have failed them as a nurse.

What a bomb to drop.
I wonder if she may say she was writing down what she thought she was been accused of, what the investigation was trying to say about her, but rather than write;

"they are saying I don’t deserve to live. I killed them on purpose because I’m not good enough. I am a horrible evil person' 'I AM EVIL I DID THIS"

She instead wrote it as if she was actually saying it herself, about herself.

I think that would be a stretch and most people would find it hard to believe, but I can't think of many other attempts to explain it.
 
Last edited:
The juror’s really are in for a long and hard 6 months. A general trial is draining enough, but such a trial, with such detail, in such length, involving such defenceless babies is going to be SO tough on them!
 
"On some of the notes were phrases such as “Why/how has this happened – what process has led to this current situation. What allegations have been made and by who? Do they have written evidence to support their comments?"

I wonder if that was a note of a conversation with someone else eg a solicitor or union rep.
 
I wonder if they will try and explain it as a competency concern - ie 'on purpose' meaning the deliberate actions I took somehow led to fatalities 'because I wasn't good enough' at my job.

We don't yet know if LL has even admitted to writing those notes.

What struck me in some of the closing remarks from the opening speech was how much the word 'coincidence' was being used.

I just don't know what to think.
 
I wonder if she may say she was writing down what she thought she was been accused of, what the investigation was trying to say about her, but rather than write;

"they are saying I don’t deserve to live. I killed them on purpose because I’m not good enough. I am a horrible evil person' 'I AM EVIL I DID THIS"

She instead wrote it as if she was actually saying it herself, about herself.

I think that would be a stretch and most people would find it hard to believe, but I can't think of many other attempts to explain it.
Yeah, using the argument they are all shorthand notes from a meeting with her Solicitor and that it was somehow her writing down what she was being accused of is the only quasi-plausible explanation I can come up with.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
134
Guests online
1,889
Total visitors
2,023

Forum statistics

Threads
600,236
Messages
18,105,668
Members
230,992
Latest member
Bella257
Back
Top