- Joined
- May 9, 2009
- Messages
- 39,346
- Reaction score
- 117,453
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is a good example of those in positions of responsibility not playing by the rules, but I think it's important to note that many of the perpetrators were punished for their actions, losing their jobs and/or facing criminal charges (leaving WC aside as his offending was another level). These consequences reflect the seriousness of this type of behaviour. Plus, the comments in the WhatsApp groups demonstrated a complete lack of respect and empathy for the victims. The question is does LL accessing the patients' parents' social media also reflect a similar lack of respect and empathy for her patients?I do get what you are saying but I reckon that doing stuff you've been repeatedly trained not to do is a lot more common than many people would appreciate. You just have to look at what's come out recently regarding the highly offensive and probably illegal messages in the WhatsApp group of ex-Met officers. Same happened with Wayne Couzens and his mates and they were serving. No, it's not the same kind of situation but it goes to show that professional people doing unethical things is not rare. The more minor stuff I think is probably very common.
Maybe it does, maybe it doesn't. It's not really directly related to her guilt (or not) though.This is a good example of those in positions of responsibility not playing by the rules, but I think it's important to note that many of the perpetrators were punished for their actions, losing their jobs and/or facing criminal charges (leaving WC aside as his offending was another level). These consequences reflect the seriousness of this type of behaviour. Plus, the comments in the WhatsApp groups demonstrated a complete lack of respect and empathy for the victims. The question is does LL accessing the patients' parents' social media also reflect a similar lack of respect and empathy for her patients?
Yes, I'm aware, thank you. This was specifically to reply to a post on the ethical and moral debate that was happening on the thread where many posters commented on how they have done similar or could understand..Evidence of FB searches/social media use/SMS etc in the context of this trial, is only concerned with LL's reasons and whether or not it supports that there had been criminal intent, either before or during the alleged offences.
The moral and ethical debate surrounding SM use and what is acceptable/unacceptable relative to professional standards could be viewed as a distraction as it is not being tested in the court.
"she was not paralysed" is a strange comment.TODAY’s PROCEEDINGS
10:35am
Child H - attempted murder allegation (twice)
Child H was born in September 2015 and had breathing difficulties shortly after birth.
She was transferred to neonatal unit nursery room 1.
10:37am
Independent experts say there was an "unacceptable delay" in tubating her and administering a protein which helps the lungs, which the prosecution say means the case is complicated by "sub-optimal treatment" at the hospital.
Additionally, Child H "was put on a ventilator she was not paralysed; she was also left with butterfly needles in her chest for prolonged periods which may have punctured her lung tissues and contributed to further punctured lungs."
10:44am
The prosecution say Letby attempted to kill Child H on September 26 at 3.24am, and on September 27 at 12.55am.
Mr Johnson said Child H had previously deteriorated on the night of September 23 and required ventilator support and intubation, followed later by oxygen support.
The court hears Child H responded to intervening treatment, but desaturations were "frequent" and "significant".
Mr Johnson said all but two events could be explained medically and responded to with routine resuscitative measures.
The two events - in the early hours of September 26 and 27, were "uncharacteristic" and required CPR.
Recap: Prosecution opens trial of Lucy Letby accused of Countess of Chester Hospital baby murders
THE trial of former Countess of Chester Hospital nurse Lucy Letby, who is accused of multiple baby murders, is due to finalise its jury and hear…www.chesterstandard.co.uk
I thought that. I fail to see its relevance."she was not paralysed" is a strange comment.
IMO
I thought that. I fail to see its relevance.
I assume if not paralysed it makes it harder to ventilate and thus could lead to lower oxygen levelsI thought that. I fail to see its relevance.
The question is does LL accessing the patients' parents' social media also reflect a similar lack of respect and empathy for her patients?
I assume if not paralysed it makes it harder to ventilate and thus could lead to lower oxygen levels
Then the prosecution should be making this clear as it sets in people's minds the word "paralised" which most people not medically trained may well associate with negative connotations.I'm guessing that it's perhaps the fact you should be paralysed/sedated if placed on a vent?
Usually patients are heavily sedated prior to intubation because it is a scary experience. The term 'paralysed ' is used to describe it."she was not paralysed" is a strange comment.
IMO
I thought that. I fail to see its relevance.