Without a doubt! Will be interesting to see who they have.
This is always my issue with any ‘expert testimony’, especially in the medical field. Lay people tend to assume medical science is made up of black and white answers, but so much of our current understanding and practice deals in shades of grey.
The same test results can get 5 different interpretations from 5 different doctors, and that’s before you add the weight of a high profile court case to the process.
It’s why we call it ‘a second opinion’ - because medicine is as much an art as a science.
So it usually comes down to ‘which expert did the jury like best’, which never feels entirely rational and objective to me.