JosieJo
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2018
- Messages
- 3,244
- Reaction score
- 22,423
I agree these things ...and the note are just things added by the prosecution to try and add to their version of eventsI tend to agree with this but I don't think that it's clear why she said it in this case. To be fair, we don't know the specific questions put to her and her precise answers.
On the matter of the FB searches; again I'd still like to know the specific questions put to her and, importantly, when they were put to her. I can't recall whether the prosecution has said anything on the latter point but, if I were guessing, I'd think that those questions were likely put to her on the second arrest or possibly late on in the first arrest. They would have only seized her devices at the time of the first arrest so would they have had enough time to examine them and to decide what questions to ask as regards them during the first arrest?
I can accept that she may have lied in relation to those questions but I don't think it automatically follows that that is an indication of guilt. Were it me in that situation then I could well imagine lying about such things under the stress of a police interview because it looks dodgy and possibly unethical. If she is just the type of person who needs answers and can't just let things drop then I can well understand why she made those searches.
I'm quite a black and white person
I dont think we will ever know why she said these things or indeed wrote her notes.
To me the case will suceed if the prosecution can show a great number of these collapses were caused by foul play and she was the only person in the room with the babies just prior...sheer numbers and her presence alone will be enough