2:28pm
Mr Myers says it was an episode which resolved 'quickly' and resulted in a decision to take Child D off CPAP.
He asks whether there had been a discussion about Child D's breathing support difficulties earlier that day.
Mrs Oakley says she does not remember.
She says she believes if the desaturations had gone to the 70s, the alarms would have gone off and she would have been alerted to Child D.
The 3.45am collapse is now being referred to.
Mr Myers says at that point, Child D had been taken off CPAP.
Mrs Oakley replies: "Honestly, you would have to check the times for me."
"She was stable in between these two times?"
"Definitely."
Mr Myers says there is then a more marked deterioration, as Child D stopped breathing, and nurse Oakley called for help.
Mrs Oakley agrees.
2:31pm
The prosecution rise once more, led by Simon Driver, to ask about the discolouration of Child D's skin at 1.30am.
He asks what it was that struck her about the rash appearance that was unusual at 1.30am.
"I'd not seen it before."
He asks how it had changed by 3am.
She replies the rash wasn't as pronounced, not "as bad", but she was not expecting Child D to deteriorate again.
She says she had previously experienced 'mottled' appearance in babies - 'newborn spots', or 'mottled', but "we don't specifically get rashes, in my experience".
2:34pm
The judge, Mr Justice James Goss, asks to clarify one matter from the 1.30am collapse.
"You said some of that was what you had been told had happened."
Mrs Oakley says the 'oral suctions' referred to what was being done to Child D before she arrived back in room 1. The part of the note from 'discolourations to skin observed' were her own observations.
The trial of Lucy Letby, who denies murdering seven babies at the Countess of Chester Hospital neonatal unit and attempting to murder 10 more,…
www.chesterstandard.co.uk
