Hey, you want to try being a Cestrian.....Giving us Boltonians a bad name!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hey, you want to try being a Cestrian.....Giving us Boltonians a bad name!
Imagine had they, at very least, put in that CCTV as Stockport Trust did, before LE discovered Chua's crimes.Chickens coming home to roost.
Some twitchy bums this evening I would imagine
It wouldn't be a problem if there was personal accountability of managers.kind of related ( whistleblower theme)
'Exclusive: Leaked internal document lays bare concerns of ‘toxic’ issues within watchdog that mean whistleblowers’ warnings are ignored — and the public put in danger — in disturbing echoes of Lucy Letby case, writes health correspondent Rebecca Thomas
Nurses and midwives accused of serious sexual, physical and racial abuse are being allowed to keep working on wards because whistleblowers are being ignored, a damning new report has found.
Staff are too scared to report their concerns to the nursing regulator because of a “culture of fear” within the watchdog, documents seen by The Independent reveal.
One whistleblower, speaking to this publication, drew parallels with the Lucy Letby case, accusing the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) of being defensive and trying to protect their own reputation.
They claim “deep-seated toxic conduct” within the NMC is leading to skewed and failed investigations.
A review of NMC guidelines was launched after The Independent highlighted concerns earlier this year by speaking to staff who complained that the NMC was leaving nurses accused of sexual assault and domestic violence free to work unchecked. '
Revealed: NHS ‘culture of fear’ that leaves rogue nurses free to abuse patients
( some of the allegations at the link would be criminal matters)
couldn't you make the case for July 2015 onwards? ( thinking back to eg what Stockport Trust did over Chua. very prompt, iirc. ( paired work and cctv within days)In theory.. surely there's a strong case for the latter cases
Am surprised Dewi Evans is commenting on the new investigation of the Trust but anyway here he is https://x.com/TalkTV/status/1709557257308934638?s=20It wouldn't be a problem if there was personal accountability of managers.
Then, everybody would try to get rid of rotten apples.
JMO
couldn't you make the case for July 2015 onwards? ( thinking back to eg what Stockport Trust did over Chua. very prompt, iirc. ( paired work and cctv within days)
'
2 July 2015 ( after Child D)
Dr Stephen Brearey, the head consultant on the neonatal unit, carries out a review of the three unusual deaths in June 2015. ... the director .... is told that Letby was the only nurse on shift for each of the deaths, the trial was told. Letby remains on the neonatal unit.'
Timeline of Lucy Letby’s attacks on babies and when alarm was raised
How events unfolded in neonatal unit where killer nurse worked at Countess of Chester hospitalwww.theguardian.com
allegedly/ JMO/IMO /LOLO
(I've removed a name and added ellipses instead)
if not July,
'23 October 2015 ( after Child I)
Dr Brearey becomes increasingly concerned following the death of Child I. Another staffing review finds Letby was present at more unusual deaths. Another consultant, Dr Ravi Jayaram, alerts management to their concerns but is told “not to make a fuss”. Letby remains on the neonatal unit.'
I feel he would be contacted if he was saying anything out of line, being that he is familiar with many of the police overseeing the investigation and the prosecution team, from his time in court. He's not saying anything that wasn't already said by the "gang" of consultants in the media after her conviction. Only evidence directly relating to baby K is sub judice, her appeal won't be affected by anything published. The jury in her new trial will know she has been convicted.I REALLY wish DE would stop giving interviews.
It makes me so uncomfortable.
The whole thing about him and his arguments that it's a miscarriage 'cos "bad statistics" is flawed anyway. She was not convicted on the statistical evidence.I think it's bad that the reporter doesn't disclose that one of her key sources was accused, by Judge Goss just a few months ago, of a ' flagrant and serious contempt of court.... you are liable to arrest and at risk of imprisonment'