Agreed!
I am thoroughly sick and tired of hearing the word "statistics" and hearing from "statisticians" who want to shove their oar where it should not be shoved! Where tf were they at the original trial if they had such great reservations about how it was being conducted?
This case and, so it follows, her convictions were not grounded in "statistics". The media are largely to blame for this for badly reporting it (with a few notable exceptions such as the DM) which gave a false impression that someone reviewing statistics months or years later noticed a spike and notified management who then identified LL on investigating matters.
Anyone who followed the trial knows that this was never the case and that Lucy Letby was suspected by staff, including consultants, for a long time simply because she was always around when collapses happened and always seemed to be alone. She was categorically not identified due to statistical anomalies!
The court didn't spend 10 months looking at a graph of a spike in deaths and a chart of names with varying amounts of "X"'s next to them!
These people really need to be put back in their boxes, quite frankly!