DianaWW
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2022
- Messages
- 594
- Reaction score
- 4,470
I don’t think that’s true, and I don’t think anyone thinks the hospital was perfect. The issue people have is that many people are using hospital failings as a way to imply that LL is innocent, when that doesn’t even begin to explain how these deaths occurred. The trial was to ascertain whether or not LL murdered those babies and the inquiry will highlight the hospital failings that allowed her to do what she did.It is, but it is also the reason people are coming out of the wooodwork- the posts on here when you read through them (and I have watched and waited for days before posting) all imply this is about changing the verdict and no one should be giving this information space on the news- but that just isn’t true, it does need questioning for so many reasons.
The guardian article is another one that has cherry picked evidence, and quoted experts that haven’t viewed the medical evidence.
A well rounded, unbiased article would also have included Baby E’s Mums testimony (that was backed up by phone records), the liver injury, the falsifying of notes, the fraudulent datix, the weird note addressed to 3 dead triplets, the huge amounts of contradictions and downright lies in her testimony…and much more. None of these articles are willing to include anything that points to her guilt though. Why? JMO.
Last edited: