Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
One thing is for sure -
The media circus will be in fulllll force.
Lurid stories and photos will surface.
During Queen's Jubilee events.
Has he ever heard the word "NO" in his life?
The Queen is the One and OnlyYes. When a valet punched him knocking him on his back side. He was a kid and wouldn't stop harassing the staff member. Queen wouldn't accept his resignation, coolly commenting that apparently Andrew deserved it.
Opinion - read this a long time ago.
It's interesting that while Andrew just denies or can't confirm or deny, each specific count, he offers nothing to exonerate himself.
moo
If he’s innocent, it’s very hard to prove a negative.
Also, I understand that his ‘side’ have not seen the evidence nor has ‘discovery’ taken place.
Give it all time to surface, let’s see if he counter sues for defamation etc.
Clear now as to why The Queen demoted him to ‘private citizen’.
The Royals usually buy their way out of trouble, perhaps he’d been smarter to just pay her off with no admission of guilt.
I do understand how that would look given the nature of the case.
Hit and Sink!@LisaBloom
·
3m
Prince Andrew's 6th and 7th defenses: Virginia shouldn't recover because she did bad things too. This is a clear signal that Prince Andrew intends an all out attack on Virginia. And no matter what she may have done, that would never bar her claim for child sexual abuse.
@LisaBloom
·
2m
Prince Andrew's 8th defense: Virginia filed too late. Yet at the last hearing Andrew's attorney acknowledged she filed 5 days before the deadline. Which means she filed timely.
@LisaBloom
·
45s
Many reporters have asked me today: what does it mean that Prince Andrew wants a jury? Nothing. Virginia already requested it in her complaint, and she's entitled to it, because only one side needs to ask. So this is likely just PR, or his attorneys' use of a template.
https://twitter.com/LisaBloom/status/1486469344137674755
If he’s innocent, it’s very hard to prove a negative.
Also, I understand that his ‘side’ have not seen the evidence nor has ‘discovery’ taken place.
Give it all time to surface, let’s see if he counter sues for defamation etc.
Clear now as to why The Queen demoted him to ‘private citizen’.
The Royals usually buy their way out of trouble, perhaps he’d been smarter to just pay her off with no admission of guilt.
I do understand how that would look given the nature of the case.
Not to mention that he proclaimed in his interview that GM was his friend, not JE.He's a royal and there are surely diaries and close employees such as his personal valet and his appointment secretary, among others, who could easily provide "receipts". A normal everyday Joe or Jane may have a hard time proving where they were at any given time how many years ago, but not a royal. More than one person knows where they are at all times.
And yes, if this is such nonsense and he denies everything, why hasn't he launched a counter suit already? This is not out of the blue, first time his name came up.
MOO
He's a royal and there are surely diaries and close employees such as his personal valet and his appointment secretary, among others, who could easily provide "receipts". A normal everyday Joe or Jane may have a hard time proving where they were at any given time how many years ago, but not a royal. More than one person knows where they are at all times.