Guessing you've found him guilty before the evidence is presented at trial then.
You have no evidence of abuse or rape or in fact his low character. Very prejudicial.
BTW I'm not standing up for the guy, I'm making the point that there has to be a presumption of innocence for the legal process to function.
Guessing you've found him guilty before the evidence is presented at trial then.
You have no evidence of abuse or rape or in fact his low character. Very prejudicial.
BTW I'm not standing up for the guy, I'm making the point that there has to be a presumption of innocence for the legal process to function.
No, that's an assumption - my parents broke up 16 years ago and there are unresolved issues (not on this scale I might add), but to assume ill feelings are automatically resolved in ten years is folly
I'm of the opinion it was a sexual obsession on NM's part. He sounds of low character considering all he's done, abusing her when she was younger or raping her on the day he killed her would be on the cards, imo.
I'm of the opinion it was a sexual obsession on NM's part. He sounds of low character considering all he's done, abusing her when she was younger or raping her on the day he killed her would be on the cards, imo.
Based on zero facts.It's MY opinion.
I really don't know enough about him to make such assumptions. He looks quite personable in those wedding photos. It could even be the opposite, that Becky had a crush on him.
That implies only ugly people are murderers, that's almost as bad as the comments I read the other day essentially saying 'it can't be them, they look affluent'I really don't know enough about him to make such assumptions. He looks quite personable in those wedding photos. It could even be the opposite, that Becky had a crush on him.
IF being the important word.Well, here we all are explaining our 'theories' departing from the idea that NM murdered BW. The trial will be in months, but we have to depart from something or it will be impossible to discuss the case. I have some 'faith' that AS police did a good job and so, NM did it. And, if he did, he really has to be under low character.
That implies only ugly people are murderers, that's almost as bad as the comments I read the other day essentially saying 'it can't be them, they look affluent'
IF being the important word.
A&S Police still have a lot of work to do, in fact they have a hell of a lot of work to do.
Certainly plausible but more importantly doesn't rely on presumptions about things like his character or acts that there is no current evidence happenedIt's MY opinion.
Of course, there is a legal process. I'm not on the jury. Maybe, she slipped in the bathroom, he got scared and decided to dismember her, that's an opinion too.
Or he thought she was a brat, they had a fight, he hit her, she hit back, and he strangled her in a fit of fury.
Everyone is so quick to go for a sexual motive. I remember when the realtor was killed (drawing a blank here with the name), 90% of posters were rushing to find a sexual motive based on an older, highly altered photography of the victim.
IF being the important word.
A&S Police still have a lot of work to do, in fact they have a hell of a lot of work to do.
Yup, tons of scenarios and highly likely that the defence will go with a version of your last one.Of course, there could be so many scenarios and I'm sure NM will either provide one or maybe not.
I don't know about the case you're talking about but RW was a very young and gorgeous girl with anxiety issues. My guess is as good as yours how he felt about her, but he is accused of her murder and dismemberment and time will tell.
Certainly plausible but more importantly doesn't rely on presumptions about things like his character or acts that there is no current evidence happened
Everyone is so quick to go for a sexual motive. I remember when the realtor was killed (drawing a blank here with the name), 90% of posters were rushing to find a sexual motive based on an older, highly altered photography of the victim.