GUILTY UK - Rebecca Watts, 16, Bristol, 19 Feb 2015 #7

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Siobhan Robbins ‏@SiobhanRobbins [video=twitter;656791860875304960]https://twitter.com/SiobhanRobbins/status/656791860875304960[/video]
Noticed at times he had a bit of an anger problem.Sometimes snap with frustration.Evidence finished
 
Siobhan Robbins ‏@SiobhanRobbins [video=twitter;656792405321121792]https://twitter.com/SiobhanRobbins/status/656792405321121792[/video]
Laura Maria Warren giving evidence.2007 was in TA, was writing dissertation at uni about military personnel and she asked NM to help.
 
Does Nathan smoke? He made such a big fuss about SH smoking it would seem unlikely. Maybe it was KD or DD?

I can't imagine Nathan inviting JI back into the home...esp for a smoke. Why would he do that, esp with the arguing, SH there, etc?
 
Yes, I would have thought it was a matter to be taken into consideration for sentencing. I can't see how he can possibly be found not guilty since he seems to have freely admitted that he knew he was assisting in something illegal.

Agreed, crazy that he has gone not guilty. Am interested in what DD has to say, I have a feeling he was literally in the wrong place at the wrong time and had no involvement other than being at the house when the Police arrived. I don't think ANY of the Barton Court accused knew it was Body parts, even when they heard of NM's arrest, it wouldn't be the first thing that came to mind. 'Police were looking for a Body', That however, is the point at which they should have called the police and come clean. ALL MOO
 
Tortoise - you're doing a sterling job keeping up with both Twitter feeds - thank you!

:yourock:
 
I can't imagine Nathan inviting JI back into the home...esp for a smoke. Why would he do that, esp with the arguing, SH there, etc?

To make the whole situation seem a bit more normal? I must admit I am confused by this point too, but surely it would be easily cleared up if JI were to clarify who he was talking about.
 
Siobhan Robbins ‏@SiobhanRobbins [video=twitter;656793699528130564]https://twitter.com/SiobhanRobbins/status/656793699528130564[/video]
One time he got into trouble for letting mates ride in army vehicle.Apart from that found him to be a typical young squaddie
 
I've been wondering whether they employed cadaver dogs in this case or whether they felt they had enough evidence without. Seeing how accurate some of them can be it wouldve been interesting to see where abouts they alerted in SH's home.

A dog went in to Crownhill house but not sure about NM's. I expect so though.
 
Siobhan Robbins ‏@SiobhanRobbins [video=twitter;656794257022435328]https://twitter.com/SiobhanRobbins/status/656794257022435328[/video]
Training TA were given to keep accommodation block "absolutely pristine"..."when I say spotless,I mean spotless". Punished if not
 
I don't think ANY of the Barton Court accused knew it was Body parts, even when they heard of NM's arrest, it wouldn't be the first thing that came to mind. 'Police were looking for a Body', That however, is the point at which they should have called the police and come clean. ALL MOO

I agree. I haven't heard anything so far that makes me think any of the "helpers" knew or even pondered that it was Beckys body, when they agreed to help.

And if JI had never met NM before he might not even know he was related to Becky.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
140
Guests online
2,058
Total visitors
2,198

Forum statistics

Threads
601,717
Messages
18,128,748
Members
231,133
Latest member
USE
Back
Top