tallmansix
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2014
- Messages
- 215
- Reaction score
- 1,115
Changing the subject a little on this thread, The Times today has an interview with Katherine Goodwin. It is behind a paywall, but this titbit of information about the investigation stuck out for me -
“At 3pm on Tuesday 9th March there was a breakthrough. CCTV from a bus showed Everard standing next to a white car with the hazard lights flashing”.
So they saw the cctv at 3pm, had forensics on site within about half an hour/40mins and then had police outside his door 2 hrs 45 mins later during which time they identified the car/him/the fact he was a police man and had used the ANPR system to trace the movements of that car down to Kent.
Just shows that while there is all this surveillance technology, it still requires painstaking hours of human interpretation of that technology to analyse and make sense of it. But thank god they did.
Sarah Everard murder: How Wayne Couzens was caught in a vast web of security cameras.
Sarah Everard murder: How Wayne Couzens was caught in a vast web of security cameras | News | The Times
This is good to hear about how swiftly the police moved once they had information linking him to that scene and the benefits of CCTV.....
but .....
At this point the indecent exposure incident at Swanley services which had captured the number plate of his Seat is now 10 days old and absolutely no investigation has commenced or linked to the fact that it was a serving police officer.