WestLondoner
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2021
- Messages
- 1,280
- Reaction score
- 3,055
I find myself wondering about the alleged phone call on the last Sunday night between AL and SJL - in fact, the whole weekend.
AL gets back from holiday that week and meets up with SJL, we are told, on Friday. In a documentary made shortly after, he said this was at the PoW, and that her stuff was lifted from there. Later he said they went to Mossop's next door that Friday, had never been to the PoW and that the loss of stuff "never happened". We don't know what transpired between them but she did not see him all day on Saturday, was photographed sitting on someone else's knee at the party, avoided him to go to the coast on Sunday and avoided him again in travelling back.
AL says they spoke on the phone that evening. It is hard to know why, since they could have done so at any time all day. He does not know who 'phoned whom. If he had received a call from a payphone he'd know - the background noise and the sound of coins being added told you this. He does not mention this.
CV and MH both say that on that Sunday evening, her stuff was found outside the pub, by its phone box.
DL's account in her open letter to SJL says her daughter spent the balance of the evening in her flat gossiping with NB. She does not mention any calls made or taken at the family house. In fact, the conversation there seems to have been about a property wheeze SJL was putting together, something DL also edited from the narrative. NB, SJL's lodger, does not mention SJL taking or making any calls at the flat. So the sole source for the fact and content of this call would appear to be AL, and it would appear to have been about nothing; some event they were going to on Tuesday. In fact, he's also the sole source for their having met up on Friday.
Another way of looking at this is that SJL ended it with AL on Friday (perhaps having heard that DH, her ex with whom she'd never completely split up, was back in town - he was). AL was thus well and truly dumped and was ghosted all weekend. On the way back from her mother, SJL stopped at the PoW to make some phone call - her stuff being found there showed this - that she did not want overheard. So she made it not from home or from her mother's house, but from a payphone. AL later laid claim to receiving this call, at 10.15pm. He forgot that he'd have noticed if he had been called from a payphone, and has not given a credible account of what was said in it, given she had nothing to say to him all day.
AS subsequently said he'd altered some immaterial stuff in his book to suit DL. I wonder if he altered the bit where AL, having received no call at all, instead did so. Perhaps AS changed this to suit DL, who feared what would otherwise be read into SJL's furtive call from a payphone - yet another secret bloke perhaps.
So in 1988ish, to suit DL, AL sticks to the story that they went to the PoW on the Friday and she lost her diary then. He is never challenged with CV or MH's account that it was the Sunday, not least because the narrative has now taken hold that Cannan did it. By 2018 - after DL's death - he's telling DV that Friday at the PoW never happened at all, and that they were actually at Mossop's. A hallmark of the unskilled liar is of course that he forgets what he has said previously and to whom.
AL was conclusively eliminated at the time, so he's not concealing anything about any involvement because he had none. So, other than to protect SJL's posthumous reputation as DL saw it, why did he mislead everyone? SJL was clearly at that pub on Sunday. It could indeed have been 10.15pm. If so, CV just missed her when he came outside at 10.30 and saw her stuff. Did she call AL to say "Can you not take a hint"? Did he deduce a phone call, from where her stuff was found, and claim it had been made to him, to dissuade inquiry into whom SJL had really phoned?
AL gets back from holiday that week and meets up with SJL, we are told, on Friday. In a documentary made shortly after, he said this was at the PoW, and that her stuff was lifted from there. Later he said they went to Mossop's next door that Friday, had never been to the PoW and that the loss of stuff "never happened". We don't know what transpired between them but she did not see him all day on Saturday, was photographed sitting on someone else's knee at the party, avoided him to go to the coast on Sunday and avoided him again in travelling back.
AL says they spoke on the phone that evening. It is hard to know why, since they could have done so at any time all day. He does not know who 'phoned whom. If he had received a call from a payphone he'd know - the background noise and the sound of coins being added told you this. He does not mention this.
CV and MH both say that on that Sunday evening, her stuff was found outside the pub, by its phone box.
DL's account in her open letter to SJL says her daughter spent the balance of the evening in her flat gossiping with NB. She does not mention any calls made or taken at the family house. In fact, the conversation there seems to have been about a property wheeze SJL was putting together, something DL also edited from the narrative. NB, SJL's lodger, does not mention SJL taking or making any calls at the flat. So the sole source for the fact and content of this call would appear to be AL, and it would appear to have been about nothing; some event they were going to on Tuesday. In fact, he's also the sole source for their having met up on Friday.
Another way of looking at this is that SJL ended it with AL on Friday (perhaps having heard that DH, her ex with whom she'd never completely split up, was back in town - he was). AL was thus well and truly dumped and was ghosted all weekend. On the way back from her mother, SJL stopped at the PoW to make some phone call - her stuff being found there showed this - that she did not want overheard. So she made it not from home or from her mother's house, but from a payphone. AL later laid claim to receiving this call, at 10.15pm. He forgot that he'd have noticed if he had been called from a payphone, and has not given a credible account of what was said in it, given she had nothing to say to him all day.
AS subsequently said he'd altered some immaterial stuff in his book to suit DL. I wonder if he altered the bit where AL, having received no call at all, instead did so. Perhaps AS changed this to suit DL, who feared what would otherwise be read into SJL's furtive call from a payphone - yet another secret bloke perhaps.
So in 1988ish, to suit DL, AL sticks to the story that they went to the PoW on the Friday and she lost her diary then. He is never challenged with CV or MH's account that it was the Sunday, not least because the narrative has now taken hold that Cannan did it. By 2018 - after DL's death - he's telling DV that Friday at the PoW never happened at all, and that they were actually at Mossop's. A hallmark of the unskilled liar is of course that he forgets what he has said previously and to whom.
AL was conclusively eliminated at the time, so he's not concealing anything about any involvement because he had none. So, other than to protect SJL's posthumous reputation as DL saw it, why did he mislead everyone? SJL was clearly at that pub on Sunday. It could indeed have been 10.15pm. If so, CV just missed her when he came outside at 10.30 and saw her stuff. Did she call AL to say "Can you not take a hint"? Did he deduce a phone call, from where her stuff was found, and claim it had been made to him, to dissuade inquiry into whom SJL had really phoned?