It is actually claimed Cherwell that both suzy and Cannan's dna were found in the red Sierra but it could not be proved that both were in the car at the same time ...this is the same car that a dna sample of sandra courts was found too but in her case it was that it was incomplete .IMBW, but wasn't it a red Sierra that was associated with him, and the hair found in it had a partial DNA match to Sandra Court, not Suzy. The DNA was insignificant as it would have been consistent with a large percentage of the population.
If there was also a red Fiesta, I have missed that.
Does this mean that a complete sample for suzy was found and a complete sample for Cannan was found but was deemed circumstantial because it couldn't be proved both were in the car together.
Surely if this was the case it is more than circumstantial and more than a coincidence in light of what happened suzy .obviously I don't understand how courtroom law fully works but isn't all evidence like this circumstantial unless culprit is caught red handed ??