soozieqtips
Owned by a cat...
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2011
- Messages
- 2,954
- Reaction score
- 0
I don't think the fact that Tia has an extended family means anything negative. These days, lots of people are divorced, separated, living with someone new etc, and as a consequence, gain an extended family.
What I do think is really strange is that <modsnip> (the step-granddad) told his dad one thing and the rest of the family another thing. Why? The truth doesn't change. Unless the media have got their facts wrong, it doesn't bode well for him at all. He met her in Croydon on the Thursday night to take her back to Grandma's place, but do we know if Grandma even saw her that night? She's a care worker. Could she have been doing a night shift on the Thursday and not seen Tia at all?
Sorry if this info is in the thread somewhere, but it's gone 1am and I skimmed through really fast. The only 'witness' who claims to have seen Tia leave Grandma's house on Friday morning alone was Jane someone-or-other. But it contradicts Hazell's account (one of his accounts anyway) of walking Tia to the tram station.
Even if the papers have got everything wrong about Hazell's account of what happened on the Friday morning, it still doesn't explain why Tia hasn't been picked up on CCTV - unless she never left the house in the first place. But if that's the case, she'd still be there, which she's not. Therefore, she would have had to have been 'moved' (like Milly Dowler). If she was moved, surely someone would have seen something.
There's also the possibility that she was abducted between leaving the house and getting to the tram station. But of course, if Hazell's tram story is correct, that's not an option. Do we know what Hazell's movements were after he walked Tia to the tram station, or didn't walk her there?
What I do think is really strange is that <modsnip> (the step-granddad) told his dad one thing and the rest of the family another thing. Why? The truth doesn't change. Unless the media have got their facts wrong, it doesn't bode well for him at all. He met her in Croydon on the Thursday night to take her back to Grandma's place, but do we know if Grandma even saw her that night? She's a care worker. Could she have been doing a night shift on the Thursday and not seen Tia at all?
Sorry if this info is in the thread somewhere, but it's gone 1am and I skimmed through really fast. The only 'witness' who claims to have seen Tia leave Grandma's house on Friday morning alone was Jane someone-or-other. But it contradicts Hazell's account (one of his accounts anyway) of walking Tia to the tram station.
Even if the papers have got everything wrong about Hazell's account of what happened on the Friday morning, it still doesn't explain why Tia hasn't been picked up on CCTV - unless she never left the house in the first place. But if that's the case, she'd still be there, which she's not. Therefore, she would have had to have been 'moved' (like Milly Dowler). If she was moved, surely someone would have seen something.
There's also the possibility that she was abducted between leaving the house and getting to the tram station. But of course, if Hazell's tram story is correct, that's not an option. Do we know what Hazell's movements were after he walked Tia to the tram station, or didn't walk her there?