Found Deceased UT - MacKenzie "Kenzie" Lueck, 23, Salt Lake City, 17 June 2019 #19 *ARREST*
- Thread starter liltexans
- Start date
- Status
ilovechili
Where is the wiKKed witch? Will Oct. bring her?
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2018
- Messages
- 4,388
- Reaction score
- 32,456
I have felt from the start in putting together certain things that this was going to be bigger than Utah and bigger than this death (not in any way minimizing what happened to Kenzie which was atrocious enough by far).
Their new charges fit right into what I think and have thought from early on but I will say I did not expect part of it to be children, or hoped, but I figured it went well beyond the SD/SB theme--the B&B and room the contractor was asked to build were two such indications, as were cameras all over his B & B. Further charges will not surprise me either although other types of things would be harder to charge perhaps--children are a no brainer, it is wrong and chargeable as a felony to even possess such.
This alone is going to bring in a major federal investigation I would think and it is branching out hugely and probably has from the start. They made it clear these children are not necessarily in Utah but someone did this and someone photographed them and someone made the pictures accessible to the perp here at minimum. And I would think all involved know each other to a certain extent as they all know how disgusting and illegal this is and they wouldn't provide such pictures to just any stranger I would not think. Others will likely be indicted here but it will very likely be federal.
What never ceases to amaze me is the sheer stupidity of perpetrators.
He is as evil and vile as they come. I have always thought those two words are an anagram of each other for a reason.
All jmo but based on what we know.
The bright side is with these 19 additional charges at minimum, and perhaps more to come, this man will never see the outside of a cell again.
Their new charges fit right into what I think and have thought from early on but I will say I did not expect part of it to be children, or hoped, but I figured it went well beyond the SD/SB theme--the B&B and room the contractor was asked to build were two such indications, as were cameras all over his B & B. Further charges will not surprise me either although other types of things would be harder to charge perhaps--children are a no brainer, it is wrong and chargeable as a felony to even possess such.
This alone is going to bring in a major federal investigation I would think and it is branching out hugely and probably has from the start. They made it clear these children are not necessarily in Utah but someone did this and someone photographed them and someone made the pictures accessible to the perp here at minimum. And I would think all involved know each other to a certain extent as they all know how disgusting and illegal this is and they wouldn't provide such pictures to just any stranger I would not think. Others will likely be indicted here but it will very likely be federal.
What never ceases to amaze me is the sheer stupidity of perpetrators.
He is as evil and vile as they come. I have always thought those two words are an anagram of each other for a reason.
All jmo but based on what we know.
The bright side is with these 19 additional charges at minimum, and perhaps more to come, this man will never see the outside of a cell again.
This is the article I read that mentioned the pole cams. Still confusing.
https://ksltv.com/418906/thousands-of-pictures-collected-in-case-against-suspect-of-slain-student/
Thousands Of Pictures Collected In Case Against Suspect Of Slain Student
BY BRITTANY GLAS, KSL TV
JULY 30, 2019 AT 10:37 PM
Salt Lake police arrest Ayoola Adisa Ajayi, 31, at an apartment complex at 1028 S. West Temple on Friday, June 28, 2019. Police say Ajayi was arrested for investigation of aggravated murder, aggravated kidnapping and desecration of a body in the disappearance of University of Utah student Mackenzie Lueck. (Kristin Murphy, Deseret News)
SALT LAKE CITY, Utah – Evidence in the murder investigation of University of Utah student Mackenzie Lueck show the Salt Lake District Attorney’s Office has collected thousands of pictures in their case against Ayoola Ajayi.
Ajayi is the 31-year-old man accused of kidnapping and killing Lueck. The 23-year-old was killed about six weeks ago.
Law enforcement has served 28 search warrants in their investigation. None of those search warrants have been released, but the court filings reveal new details about the evidence. Investigators have collected more than three thousand pictures. Something called “Ajayi pole cam videos” are part of the prosecution’s discovery, as well as “Mackenzie SD camera cards,” with sections titled “bed cam” and “living room cam.” Phone and video interviews were conducted with about a dozen people.
Warrants have been served on bank accounts, at least two other people’s phones, and several social media and dating accounts belonging to Lueck and Ajayi.
The suspect is expected back in court on August 26theL 5 TV LIVE
Seattle1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2013
- Messages
- 41,206
- Reaction score
- 427,945
This is the article I read that mentioned the pole cams. Still confusing.
https://ksltv.com/418906/thousands-of-pictures-collected-in-case-against-suspect-of-slain-student/
Thousands Of Pictures Collected In Case Against Suspect Of Slain Student
BY BRITTANY GLAS, KSL TV
JULY 30, 2019 AT 10:37 PM
Salt Lake police arrest Ayoola Adisa Ajayi, 31, at an apartment complex at 1028 S. West Temple on Friday, June 28, 2019. Police say Ajayi was arrested for investigation of aggravated murder, aggravated kidnapping and desecration of a body in the disappearance of University of Utah student Mackenzie Lueck. (Kristin Murphy, Deseret News)
SALT LAKE CITY, Utah – Evidence in the murder investigation of University of Utah student Mackenzie Lueck show the Salt Lake District Attorney’s Office has collected thousands of pictures in their case against Ayoola Ajayi.
Ajayi is the 31-year-old man accused of kidnapping and killing Lueck. The 23-year-old was killed about six weeks ago.
Law enforcement has served 28 search warrants in their investigation. None of those search warrants have been released, but the court filings reveal new details about the evidence. Investigators have collected more than three thousand pictures. Something called “Ajayi pole cam videos” are part of the prosecution’s discovery, as well as “Mackenzie SD camera cards,” with sections titled “bed cam” and “living room cam.” Phone and video interviews were conducted with about a dozen people.
Warrants have been served on bank accounts, at least two other people’s phones, and several social media and dating accounts belonging to Lueck and Ajayi.
The suspect is expected back in court on August 26theL 5 TV LIVE
This JULY 30, headline is so misleading!
They've not collected 3,000 pictures from AA but 3,000 total from all parties -- hundreds from AA's car alone. This is evident in the discovery (less 19 photos of child *advertiser censored* located on AA's computer and not previously listed).
The Ajayi "pole cam videos" were actually taken by LE during the execution of the search warrants. It's very clear in the discovery documents, and evident watching LE filming inside and outside the home.
MOO
ETA: add police pole camera image
https://media-praetorian.netdna-ssl.com/article-images/tacview.jpg?w=450&format=jpg&quality=70
Last edited:
Roadette
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2017
- Messages
- 303
- Reaction score
- 3,086
I had been hopeful that this jackwagon wasn’t savvy enough to get to the dark web. It’s not difficult, but he didn’t seem very bright.
Unfortunately the discovery of child *advertiser censored* makes me think he may have actually visited sites there. You can get it without digging the DW but IMO it seems much easier once you know how to browse there.
I’m now revisiting all my thoughts of him and what he might have done to make money to maintain his modest middle class lifestyle with an entry level job and I hate it.
Unfortunately the discovery of child *advertiser censored* makes me think he may have actually visited sites there. You can get it without digging the DW but IMO it seems much easier once you know how to browse there.
I’m now revisiting all my thoughts of him and what he might have done to make money to maintain his modest middle class lifestyle with an entry level job and I hate it.
diggndeeperstill
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2019
- Messages
- 5,614
- Reaction score
- 48,960
These revelations and new charges make me wonder if there might be people in his past that might not have come forward before coming forward now.
margarita25
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2012
- Messages
- 51,426
- Reaction score
- 207,176
I think AA is a good example of a predator who doesn’t have victim age limitations. Sometimes in cases I’ll mention another case which could be related but the ages are different and people always comment on this variance. I use Jessica Ridgeway’s killer as an example of how predators do not always discriminate, as ARS preyed on an adult jogger before killing 10 year old Jessica. William Reece is another example who killed both Laura Smither (12) and Jessica Cain (17).
So, for example, maybe BG in Abby’s and Libby's case has preyed on more than just children.
I anticipated *advertiser censored* here but I wasn’t expecting child *advertiser censored*.
Which reminds me here is a resource thread I’ve created in the WS Databases Resources section:
National and International Databases and Resources
Child *advertiser censored* Resources and Information
ETA:
Might as well bring forward the whole post (it’s long) for easy internal reference if necessary; I’ll do it in my next post so it’s separate from this one.
So, for example, maybe BG in Abby’s and Libby's case has preyed on more than just children.
I anticipated *advertiser censored* here but I wasn’t expecting child *advertiser censored*.
Which reminds me here is a resource thread I’ve created in the WS Databases Resources section:
National and International Databases and Resources
Child *advertiser censored* Resources and Information
ETA:
Might as well bring forward the whole post (it’s long) for easy internal reference if necessary; I’ll do it in my next post so it’s separate from this one.
Last edited:
margarita25
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2012
- Messages
- 51,426
- Reaction score
- 207,176
Citizen's Guide To U.S. Federal Law On Child *advertiser censored*
“18 U.S.C. § 2251- Sexual Exploitation of Children
(Production of child *advertiser censored*)
18 U.S.C. § 2251A- Selling and Buying of Children
18 U.S.C. § 2252- Certain activities relating to material involving the sexual exploitation of minors
(Possession, distribution and receipt of child *advertiser censored*)
18 U.S.C. § 2252A- certain activities relating to material constituting or containing child *advertiser censored*
18 U.S.C. § 2256- Definitions
18 U.S.C. § 2260- Production of sexually explicit depictions of a minor for importation into the United States
Images of child *advertiser censored* are not protected under First Amendment rights, and are illegal contraband under federal law. Section 2256 of Title 18, United States Code, defines child *advertiser censored* as any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct involving a minor (someone under 18 years of age). Visual depictions include photographs, videos, digital or computer generated images indistinguishable from an actual minor, and images created, adapted, or modified, but appear to depict an identifiable, actual minor. Undeveloped film, undeveloped videotape, and electronically stored data that can be converted into a visual image of child *advertiser censored* are also deemed illegal visual depictions under federal law.
Notably, the legal definition of sexually explicit conduct does not require that an image depict a child engaging in sexual activity. A picture of a naked child may constitute illegal child *advertiser censored* if it is sufficiently sexually suggestive. Additionally, the age of consent for sexual activity in a given state is irrelevant; any depiction of a minor under 18 years of age engaging in sexually explicit conduct is illegal.
Federal law prohibits the production, distribution, reception, and possession of an image of child *advertiser censored* using or affecting any means or facility of interstate or foreign commerce (See 18 U.S.C. § 2251; 18 U.S.C. § 2252; 18 U.S.C. § 2252A). Specifically, Section 2251 makes it illegal to persuade, induce, entice, or coerce a minor to engage in sexually explicit conduct for purposes of producing visual depictions of that conduct. Any individual who attempts or conspires to commit a child *advertiser censored* offense is also subject to prosecution under federal law.
Federal jurisdiction is implicated if the child *advertiser censored* offense occurred in interstate or foreign commerce. This includes, for example, using the U.S. Mails or common carriers to transport child *advertiser censored* across state or international borders. Additionally, federal jurisdiction almost always applies when the Internet is used to commit a child *advertiser censored* violation. Even if the child *advertiser censored* image itself did not travel across state or international borders, federal law may be implicated if the materials, such as the computer used to download the image or the CD-ROM used to store the image, originated or previously traveled in interstate or foreign commerce.
In addition, Section 2251A of Title 18, United States Code, specifically prohibits any parent, legal guardian or other person in custody or control of a minor under the age of 18, to buy, sell, or transfer custody of that minor for purposes of producing child *advertiser censored*.
Lastly, Section 2260 of Title 18, United States Code, prohibits any persons outside of the United States to knowingly produce, receive, transport, ship, or distribute child *advertiser censored* with intent to import or transmit the visual depiction into the United States.
Any violation of federal child *advertiser censored* law is a serious crime, and convicted offenders face severe statutory penalties. For example, a first time offender convicted of producing child *advertiser censored* under 18 U.S.C. § 2251, face fines and a statutory minimum of 15 years to 30 years maximum in prison. A first time offender convicted of transporting child *advertiser censored* in interstate or foreign commerce under 18 U.S.C. § 2252, faces fines and a statutory minimum of 5 years to 20 years maximum in prison. Convicted offenders may face harsher penalties if the offender has prior convictions or if the child *advertiser censored* offense occurred in aggravated situations defined as (i) the images are violent, sadistic, or masochistic in nature, (ii) the minor was sexually abused, or (iii) the offender has prior convictions for child sexual exploitation. In these circumstances, a convicted offender may face up to life imprisonment.
It is important to note that an offender can be prosecuted under state child *advertiser censored* laws in addition to, or instead of, federal law.”
—-
DOJ:
Child *advertiser censored*
“Child *advertiser censored* Today
Because the term “child *advertiser censored*” is used in federal statutes, it is also commonly used by lawmakers, prosecutors, investigators, and the public to describe this form of sexual exploitation of children. However, this term fails to describe the true horror that is faced by countless children every year. The production of child *advertiser censored* creates a permanent record of a child’s sexual abuse. When these images are placed on the Internet and disseminated online, the victimization of the children continues in perpetuity. Experts and victims agree that victims depicted in child *advertiser censored* often suffer a lifetime of re-victimization by knowing the images of their sexual abuse are on the Internet forever. The children exploited in these images must live with the permanency, longevity, and circulation of such a record of their sexual victimization. This often creates lasting psychological damage to the child, including disruptions in sexual development, self-image, and developing trusting relationships with others in the future.
The expansion of the Internet and advanced digital technology lies parallel to the explosion of the child *advertiser censored* market. Child *advertiser censored* images are readily available through virtually every Internet technology, including social networking websites, file-sharing sites, photo-sharing sites, gaming devices, and even mobile apps. Child *advertiser censored* offenders can also connect on Internet forums and networks to share their interests, desires, and experiences abusing children, in addition to selling, sharing, and trading images.
These online communities have promoted communication and collaboration between child *advertiser censored* offenders, thereby fostering a larger relationship premised on a shared sexual interest in children. This has the effect of eroding the shame that typically would accompany this behavior, as well as desensitizing those involved to the physical and psychological damage caused to the child victims. For this reason, online communities attract and encourage new individuals to join them in the sexual exploitation of children.
The methods many offenders use to evade law enforcement detection have also become increasingly sophisticated. Purveyors of child *advertiser censored* continue to use various encryption techniques and anonymous networks on “The Dark Internet”, attempting to hide their amassed collections of illicit child abuse images. Several sophisticated online criminal organizations have even written security manuals to ensure that their members follow preferred security protocols and encryption techniques in an attempt to evade law enforcement and facilitate the sexual abuse of children.
Unfortunately, no area of the United States or country in the world is immune from individuals who seek to sexually exploit children through child *advertiser censored*. The continuous production and distribution of child *advertiser censored* increases the demand for new and more egregious images, perpetuating the continued molestation of child victims, as well as the abuse of new children.”
-more at link
—-
ICAC Task Force
Home
“The Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force Program is a national network of 61 coordinated task forces representing over 4,500 federal, state, and local law enforcement and prosecutorial agencies. These agencies are continually engaged in proactive and reactive investigations and prosecutions of persons involved in child abuse and exploitation involving the Internet.”
——
Violent Crimes Against Children/Online Predators — FBI
“Investigations
Child Sexual Exploitation Investigations
Child sexual exploitation investigations—many of them undercover—are conducted in FBI field offices by Child Exploitation Task Forces (CETFs), which combine the resources of the FBI with those of other federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies. Each of the FBI’s 56 field offices has worked investigations developed by the VCAC program, and many of our Legal Attaché offices have coordinated with appropriate foreign law enforcement partners on international investigations. Several of these investigations are also worked in coordination with Internet Crimes Against Children (ICAC) Task Forces, which are funded by the Department of Justice. Furthermore, training is provided to all law enforcement involved in these investigations, including federal, state, local, and foreign law enforcement agencies.“
Snip
“Investigative Priorities
Child abductions—child abductions, including domestic and international parental kidnapping
Child sexual exploitation enterprises—domestic child sex trafficking organizations; online networks and enterprises manufacturing, trading, distributing, and/or selling child *advertiser censored*
Contact offenses against children—domestic travel with intent to engage in illegal sexual activity with children; child sex tourism (international travel to engage in sexual activity with children); production of child *advertiser censored*, including “sextortion” involving children who are extorted into producing child *advertiser censored*; and coercion/enticement of a minor
Trafficking of child *advertiser censored*—distribution of child *advertiser censored*; possession of child *advertiser censored*.”
——
Crimes against children / Crimes against children / Crime areas / Internet / Home - INTERPOL
“Crimes against children
Crimes against children tend to be local crimes with the vast majority taking place within the home or family circle. There are, however, a number of areas where there is an international angle:
Internet crimes: crimes against children are facilitated by the Internet, the increased use of which in recent years has led to a huge rise in offending. Not only can offenders distribute and access child abuse material more easily, but they can also come into direct contact with children – via chatrooms and social networking sites. We run a project in conjunction with Internet Access Service Providers to block access to child abuse material online. “
Access blocking / Crimes against children / Crime areas / Internet / Home - INTERPOL
“The "Worst of"-list
INTERPOL has taken responsibility for providing a list of domains containing child sexual abuse content to any (Internet) Access Service Provider (ASP) willing to participate in reducing the availability of such material on the Web.
INTERPOL's "Worst of"-list includes those domains that contain the most severe child sexual abuse material, according to defined criteria.“
——
Child Exploitation Investigations Unit
“As part of ICE’s Cyber Crimes Center (C3), the CEIU uses cutting edge investigative techniques to bring justice to consumers, producers and distributors of child *advertiser censored*, as well as to predators engaging in child sex tourism. The efforts of the CEIU, in addition to ICE’s participation in national programs like Operation Predator and international partnerships like the Virtual Global Taskforce, have resulted in the rescue of thousands of children.“
———
US DOJ
Report a Crime
Child *advertiser censored* and/or sexual exploitation of children
Call your local FBI field office or Legal Attache' Office
National Center for Missing and Exploited Children
800-THE-LOST (800-843-5678)
For more information see the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section
—-
Child *advertiser censored* Victim Assistance (CPVA)
“The FBI’s Child *advertiser censored* Victim Assistance (CPVA) program serves as the central repository for information on identified victims of child *advertiser censored*. Pursuant to federal statutes, law enforcement may be required to notify victims each time images of their victimization are seized as part of an investigation. The amount and frequency of notifications can be overwhelming, especially as victims may have difficulty coping with the impact of the crime and its ongoing aftermath.
To help streamline the notification process, CPVA attempts to minimize any additional trauma by limiting unnecessary contact with victims through utilization of the centralized and automated DOJ Victim Notification System. Through this system, CPVA continues to ensure victims are advised of the rights and services they may be entitled to as a result of any federal cases opened against offenders found in possession of their images, regardless of how much time has passed since the original exploitation took place.
CPVA is a joint initiative and coordinates directly with law enforcement or victim/witness personnel at various federal agencies, U.S. Attorneys’ Offices, and the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children.“
—-
National Center for Missing and Exploited Children
Home
——
WS Database Resources-
Child *advertiser censored* Resources and Information
“18 U.S.C. § 2251- Sexual Exploitation of Children
(Production of child *advertiser censored*)
18 U.S.C. § 2251A- Selling and Buying of Children
18 U.S.C. § 2252- Certain activities relating to material involving the sexual exploitation of minors
(Possession, distribution and receipt of child *advertiser censored*)
18 U.S.C. § 2252A- certain activities relating to material constituting or containing child *advertiser censored*
18 U.S.C. § 2256- Definitions
18 U.S.C. § 2260- Production of sexually explicit depictions of a minor for importation into the United States
Images of child *advertiser censored* are not protected under First Amendment rights, and are illegal contraband under federal law. Section 2256 of Title 18, United States Code, defines child *advertiser censored* as any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct involving a minor (someone under 18 years of age). Visual depictions include photographs, videos, digital or computer generated images indistinguishable from an actual minor, and images created, adapted, or modified, but appear to depict an identifiable, actual minor. Undeveloped film, undeveloped videotape, and electronically stored data that can be converted into a visual image of child *advertiser censored* are also deemed illegal visual depictions under federal law.
Notably, the legal definition of sexually explicit conduct does not require that an image depict a child engaging in sexual activity. A picture of a naked child may constitute illegal child *advertiser censored* if it is sufficiently sexually suggestive. Additionally, the age of consent for sexual activity in a given state is irrelevant; any depiction of a minor under 18 years of age engaging in sexually explicit conduct is illegal.
Federal law prohibits the production, distribution, reception, and possession of an image of child *advertiser censored* using or affecting any means or facility of interstate or foreign commerce (See 18 U.S.C. § 2251; 18 U.S.C. § 2252; 18 U.S.C. § 2252A). Specifically, Section 2251 makes it illegal to persuade, induce, entice, or coerce a minor to engage in sexually explicit conduct for purposes of producing visual depictions of that conduct. Any individual who attempts or conspires to commit a child *advertiser censored* offense is also subject to prosecution under federal law.
Federal jurisdiction is implicated if the child *advertiser censored* offense occurred in interstate or foreign commerce. This includes, for example, using the U.S. Mails or common carriers to transport child *advertiser censored* across state or international borders. Additionally, federal jurisdiction almost always applies when the Internet is used to commit a child *advertiser censored* violation. Even if the child *advertiser censored* image itself did not travel across state or international borders, federal law may be implicated if the materials, such as the computer used to download the image or the CD-ROM used to store the image, originated or previously traveled in interstate or foreign commerce.
In addition, Section 2251A of Title 18, United States Code, specifically prohibits any parent, legal guardian or other person in custody or control of a minor under the age of 18, to buy, sell, or transfer custody of that minor for purposes of producing child *advertiser censored*.
Lastly, Section 2260 of Title 18, United States Code, prohibits any persons outside of the United States to knowingly produce, receive, transport, ship, or distribute child *advertiser censored* with intent to import or transmit the visual depiction into the United States.
Any violation of federal child *advertiser censored* law is a serious crime, and convicted offenders face severe statutory penalties. For example, a first time offender convicted of producing child *advertiser censored* under 18 U.S.C. § 2251, face fines and a statutory minimum of 15 years to 30 years maximum in prison. A first time offender convicted of transporting child *advertiser censored* in interstate or foreign commerce under 18 U.S.C. § 2252, faces fines and a statutory minimum of 5 years to 20 years maximum in prison. Convicted offenders may face harsher penalties if the offender has prior convictions or if the child *advertiser censored* offense occurred in aggravated situations defined as (i) the images are violent, sadistic, or masochistic in nature, (ii) the minor was sexually abused, or (iii) the offender has prior convictions for child sexual exploitation. In these circumstances, a convicted offender may face up to life imprisonment.
It is important to note that an offender can be prosecuted under state child *advertiser censored* laws in addition to, or instead of, federal law.”
—-
DOJ:
Child *advertiser censored*
“Child *advertiser censored* Today
Because the term “child *advertiser censored*” is used in federal statutes, it is also commonly used by lawmakers, prosecutors, investigators, and the public to describe this form of sexual exploitation of children. However, this term fails to describe the true horror that is faced by countless children every year. The production of child *advertiser censored* creates a permanent record of a child’s sexual abuse. When these images are placed on the Internet and disseminated online, the victimization of the children continues in perpetuity. Experts and victims agree that victims depicted in child *advertiser censored* often suffer a lifetime of re-victimization by knowing the images of their sexual abuse are on the Internet forever. The children exploited in these images must live with the permanency, longevity, and circulation of such a record of their sexual victimization. This often creates lasting psychological damage to the child, including disruptions in sexual development, self-image, and developing trusting relationships with others in the future.
The expansion of the Internet and advanced digital technology lies parallel to the explosion of the child *advertiser censored* market. Child *advertiser censored* images are readily available through virtually every Internet technology, including social networking websites, file-sharing sites, photo-sharing sites, gaming devices, and even mobile apps. Child *advertiser censored* offenders can also connect on Internet forums and networks to share their interests, desires, and experiences abusing children, in addition to selling, sharing, and trading images.
These online communities have promoted communication and collaboration between child *advertiser censored* offenders, thereby fostering a larger relationship premised on a shared sexual interest in children. This has the effect of eroding the shame that typically would accompany this behavior, as well as desensitizing those involved to the physical and psychological damage caused to the child victims. For this reason, online communities attract and encourage new individuals to join them in the sexual exploitation of children.
The methods many offenders use to evade law enforcement detection have also become increasingly sophisticated. Purveyors of child *advertiser censored* continue to use various encryption techniques and anonymous networks on “The Dark Internet”, attempting to hide their amassed collections of illicit child abuse images. Several sophisticated online criminal organizations have even written security manuals to ensure that their members follow preferred security protocols and encryption techniques in an attempt to evade law enforcement and facilitate the sexual abuse of children.
Unfortunately, no area of the United States or country in the world is immune from individuals who seek to sexually exploit children through child *advertiser censored*. The continuous production and distribution of child *advertiser censored* increases the demand for new and more egregious images, perpetuating the continued molestation of child victims, as well as the abuse of new children.”
-more at link
—-
ICAC Task Force
Home
“The Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force Program is a national network of 61 coordinated task forces representing over 4,500 federal, state, and local law enforcement and prosecutorial agencies. These agencies are continually engaged in proactive and reactive investigations and prosecutions of persons involved in child abuse and exploitation involving the Internet.”
——
Violent Crimes Against Children/Online Predators — FBI
“Investigations
Child Sexual Exploitation Investigations
Child sexual exploitation investigations—many of them undercover—are conducted in FBI field offices by Child Exploitation Task Forces (CETFs), which combine the resources of the FBI with those of other federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies. Each of the FBI’s 56 field offices has worked investigations developed by the VCAC program, and many of our Legal Attaché offices have coordinated with appropriate foreign law enforcement partners on international investigations. Several of these investigations are also worked in coordination with Internet Crimes Against Children (ICAC) Task Forces, which are funded by the Department of Justice. Furthermore, training is provided to all law enforcement involved in these investigations, including federal, state, local, and foreign law enforcement agencies.“
Snip
“Investigative Priorities
Child abductions—child abductions, including domestic and international parental kidnapping
Child sexual exploitation enterprises—domestic child sex trafficking organizations; online networks and enterprises manufacturing, trading, distributing, and/or selling child *advertiser censored*
Contact offenses against children—domestic travel with intent to engage in illegal sexual activity with children; child sex tourism (international travel to engage in sexual activity with children); production of child *advertiser censored*, including “sextortion” involving children who are extorted into producing child *advertiser censored*; and coercion/enticement of a minor
Trafficking of child *advertiser censored*—distribution of child *advertiser censored*; possession of child *advertiser censored*.”
——
Crimes against children / Crimes against children / Crime areas / Internet / Home - INTERPOL
“Crimes against children
Crimes against children tend to be local crimes with the vast majority taking place within the home or family circle. There are, however, a number of areas where there is an international angle:
Internet crimes: crimes against children are facilitated by the Internet, the increased use of which in recent years has led to a huge rise in offending. Not only can offenders distribute and access child abuse material more easily, but they can also come into direct contact with children – via chatrooms and social networking sites. We run a project in conjunction with Internet Access Service Providers to block access to child abuse material online. “
Access blocking / Crimes against children / Crime areas / Internet / Home - INTERPOL
“The "Worst of"-list
INTERPOL has taken responsibility for providing a list of domains containing child sexual abuse content to any (Internet) Access Service Provider (ASP) willing to participate in reducing the availability of such material on the Web.
INTERPOL's "Worst of"-list includes those domains that contain the most severe child sexual abuse material, according to defined criteria.“
——
Child Exploitation Investigations Unit
“As part of ICE’s Cyber Crimes Center (C3), the CEIU uses cutting edge investigative techniques to bring justice to consumers, producers and distributors of child *advertiser censored*, as well as to predators engaging in child sex tourism. The efforts of the CEIU, in addition to ICE’s participation in national programs like Operation Predator and international partnerships like the Virtual Global Taskforce, have resulted in the rescue of thousands of children.“
———
US DOJ
Report a Crime
Child *advertiser censored* and/or sexual exploitation of children
Call your local FBI field office or Legal Attache' Office
National Center for Missing and Exploited Children
800-THE-LOST (800-843-5678)
For more information see the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section
—-
Child *advertiser censored* Victim Assistance (CPVA)
“The FBI’s Child *advertiser censored* Victim Assistance (CPVA) program serves as the central repository for information on identified victims of child *advertiser censored*. Pursuant to federal statutes, law enforcement may be required to notify victims each time images of their victimization are seized as part of an investigation. The amount and frequency of notifications can be overwhelming, especially as victims may have difficulty coping with the impact of the crime and its ongoing aftermath.
To help streamline the notification process, CPVA attempts to minimize any additional trauma by limiting unnecessary contact with victims through utilization of the centralized and automated DOJ Victim Notification System. Through this system, CPVA continues to ensure victims are advised of the rights and services they may be entitled to as a result of any federal cases opened against offenders found in possession of their images, regardless of how much time has passed since the original exploitation took place.
CPVA is a joint initiative and coordinates directly with law enforcement or victim/witness personnel at various federal agencies, U.S. Attorneys’ Offices, and the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children.“
—-
National Center for Missing and Exploited Children
Home
——
WS Database Resources-
Child *advertiser censored* Resources and Information
Last edited:
debbiegarcia36
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2015
- Messages
- 1,318
- Reaction score
- 1,540
In my opinion I believe these photos were not taken by A A but were downloaded from the "dark web" from countries outside the U.S. Still a serious offense though.
Midwestmom2019
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2019
- Messages
- 2,440
- Reaction score
- 20,812
Let him loose in the general population. The other prisoners will take care of him...
margarita25
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2012
- Messages
- 51,426
- Reaction score
- 207,176
This reminds me of the housekeeper comment, that he said “bring your daughter” iirc...
(You guys probably already mentioned that)
ETA:
Last edited:
MassGuy
The Monsters Aren’t The Ones Beneath The Bed
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2018
- Messages
- 25,923
- Reaction score
- 611,057
Someone did, but it’s a really good point.
That was weird initially, but it’s something else entirely now.
Thank God she didn’t oblige.
margarita25
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2012
- Messages
- 51,426
- Reaction score
- 207,176
margarita25
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2012
- Messages
- 51,426
- Reaction score
- 207,176
Delete duplicate
Last edited:
Midwestmom2019
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2019
- Messages
- 2,440
- Reaction score
- 20,812
Snuff videos.
I’m waiting to hear there were some videos featuring animals, as well.
janewall
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2016
- Messages
- 838
- Reaction score
- 6,843
I agree. IMO, if AA were the source of the material there would be a lot more than 19 photos and charges laid.
janewall
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2016
- Messages
- 838
- Reaction score
- 6,843
The first has been running through my mind for a long time re: Kenzie. Ugh.
edit: clarity
Midwestmom2019
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2019
- Messages
- 2,440
- Reaction score
- 20,812
I agree. IMO, if AA were the source of the material there would be a lot more than 19 photos and charges laid.
Think he was expanding his photography skills. Getting ready to jump into the market.
Mspionage
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2019
- Messages
- 76
- Reaction score
- 885
And there it is.
Follow up question: What types of perps are confident enough in making snuff videos? Better stated, do inexperienced perps usually go down this road? No. So what does that tell us about this subject?
The last I heard, there was some debate about whether snuff videos for commercial use actually existed—and the official viewpoint was that they didn’t.
Snuff Films
So I feel really skeptical of the idea that AA would be the first to do this.
Last edited:
- Status