Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And here in lies the problem. There have been no sightings, no additional photo's, nothing. Quite honestly I'm not sure these pictures are Amy either, could be but some people thought the Amy Bradley selling quilts looked an awful lot like her. So where does that leave us? We looked at these pictures, tried to reconstruct what happened and keep coming up with guesses?
The only "fact" we have is that Amy didn't come home to Virginia. The probable facts are someone saw her in a restroom and someone saw her in Otrbanda. After that things go cold. I have to wonder, how do we know the pictures, if they are Amy, were taken in 2002? I don't recall who verified that date.
What are we missing?
good points. we don't know when the pics were taken, just that they were on the web site as early as 2002 (according to "others", but more likely around 2004 (the earliest i recall finding them on waybackmachine).
Also FA says here that the SF sighting was verified:THBOMK there are 2 verified sightings, one by the Sailor and one by the woman in the restroom, at both those sightings Amy gave her name. The sighting in SF is BELIEVED to be her but has not been verified. I beleive FA said that.
As for FA, she is a verified insider for the Bradleys she has been authorized by the Bradleys to speak for them and they have given her their thoughts and beliefs. She has never spoken to the FBI and has never said she has spoken to them, as a matter of fact, she has said numerous times the FBI has not been very forthcoming.
If it was my child that was missing and I was desperate to find her and saw a picture that very much resembled her I'd say I was certain it was! But would I be certain because I knew definitley or was it because I WANTED TO BELIEVE it was her? These pictures surfaced almost 5 years after Amy went missing.
Posted by FindAmy: Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community
At first, the San Francisco sighting left everyone scratching their heads. I can assure you, though, that it was one of the best sightings and it has been verified as accurate. Two of the artist sketches were completed from this sighting by an FBI artist. Amy was seen on April 18, 2003 at Pier 39 (Fisherman's Wharf). She was with two "handlers" as they were watching a musician on the pier. Amy was recognized, but the handlers got her out of the area before the police could get there. The handlers actually grabbed Amy and ran when they realized that she had been identified. There were many witnesses who watched this take place. There are a number of reasons why she could have been there.
Masootz, I'll look for that 2002 link for you if you don't find it by the time I get back. Gotta run, sorry...
PS, I know I look crazy dissecting those pictures but the exact reason I did it is bc SoSueMe informed the pic is Amy. Seeing a chain on the bed is one thing, but seeing it on her wrist is scary & it goes against what was believed not to be. We were told Amy wasn't sold into sexual servitude, that there are other reasons for trafficking. Etc. but now I disagree & do think she could have been kidnapped for exactly that reason & then once she was out of her prime maybe she was used for far more heinous thing. Idk.
I know you don't agree with the chain thing. I appreciate everything you bring to this forum, masootz, as you have obvious technical knowledge. However, I honestly do see links under what appears to be marker on the wrist portion of the pic before it was scanned. My husband & my son saw it last night. However, they also just saw Taken 2 so it could have been in the back of their minds. It's important to note I didn't prompt them...
Have to run.
Found this old summary of AAV having been online since Dec 2001:
http://fifiapps.com/symbols/affordable-adult-vacations.com#carousel
It shows their original tours were out of the Dominican where a certain Canadian organized crime group is known to have established its presence there in recent years. The summary also shows it has related links to Vancouver escorts which is known to be associated with all the escort review boards in Canada. This is the 2001 Wayback on that particular site that shows how widespread their tentacles are:
http://web.archive.org/web/20010223194815/http://www.localescorts.ca/
A quick google on the locale****** brings up a hit with an obvious spelling mistake, which further shows they claim to be "owned and opperated out of Ontario":
http://www.google.ca/#hl=en&sclient...pw.r_qf.&fp=77a9610d9993fe05&biw=1280&bih=608
Trust me folks, further research in this vein is not for the faint of heart ... but we are a fearless bunch
i believe you on the 2002 thing, the older i get the harder it is for me to remember details weeks later, but that does sound familiar. much like you, it's often difficult for me to be able to look at certain sites, but i plan to check out waybackmachine again later to see when the earliest the pic shows up.
i certainly don't think you're crazy for seeing the chain, and it's your right to come to whatever opinion you want about it. it's certainly plausible that someone had a physical copy of the picture, wrote on it (or on a piece of paper that was on top of the pic, etc), and then scanned it in, causing some of the artifacting to possibly be attributed to writing or whatever.
Amy wanted to go back to college for her Masters in Sports Psychology. Right? Could anything she's learned in college be helping her to survive right now? Did she sub major in accounting, like maybe as a fallback in case her job search didn't go well?
Found this old summary of AAV having been online since Dec 2001:
http://fifiapps.com/symbols/affordable-adult-vacations.com#carousel
It shows their original tours were out of the Dominican where a certain Canadian organized crime group is known to have established its presence there in recent years. The summary also shows it has related links to Vancouver escorts which is known to be associated with all the escort review boards in Canada. This is the 2001 Wayback on that particular site that shows how widespread their tentacles are:
http://web.archive.org/web/20010223194815/http://www.localescorts.ca/
A quick google on the locale****** brings up a hit with an obvious spelling mistake, which further shows they claim to be "owned and opperated out of Ontario":
http://www.google.ca/#hl=en&sclient...pw.r_qf.&fp=77a9610d9993fe05&biw=1280&bih=608
Trust me folks, further research in this vein is not for the faint of heart ... but we are a fearless bunch