Tomorrow morning, take a walk around a residential block and see what you find on the ground.
I am 99.99% positive you will find at least one envelope.
Odds are better than 50-50 you will also find a debit/credit/gift card.
JMO
ETA - And I do not blame anyone whose child is missing for getting excited.
Maybe the debit card was broken during a lock picking exercise and then discarded.
Maybe the debit card was broken during a lock picking exercise and then discarded.
Wasn't AJ at college the week prior? BBM
Why was it so important to say it took him hours? What was so sensitive to WH about a gopro? There's a nugget in there somewhere but I can't figure it out. Was it all smoke and mirrors to explain the money? If so, then why??
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=gopro
:lol::lol::lol:All the homeless people would be eating at Red Lobster
Why was it so important to say it took him hours? What was so sensitive to WH about a gopro? There's a nugget in there somewhere but I can't figure it out. Was it all smoke and mirrors to explain the money? If so, then why??
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=gopro
Why was it so important to say it took him hours? What was so sensitive to WH about a gopro? There's a nugget in there somewhere but I can't figure it out. Was it all smoke and mirrors to explain the money? If so, then why??
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=gopro
I walk my dog around residential areas twice a day. I have NEVER found any cut up gift cards or credit cards. Once I did find a wallet and returned it and found out it had been left on the roof of the car and the guy had been looking for it too.
I have not seen any envelopes in the 12 yrs i have been walking the dogs. And that is certainly not 99% of the time as you seem to predict. :waitasec:
He didn't "overhear" anything (IMHO, of course). He was going through her phone. He probably saw a text conversation about it between AJ and her bf and concocted the story about overhearing them and then getting money for her and everything else to fit in with the rest of the web of lies he told in that podcast (including the disgusting part about silently watching her die before she "departed his presence").
Could it be as simple as wanting to sound like such a good, devoted "dad" to AJ that he would spend hours learning about something she wanted and then hand over the money for it as well. It's like he's writing a book and he's the main character.
I've wondered why he stressed the go pro so much, too. There may be more to it. I wish I was smart enough to make a connection. But all I can come up with is at one point he had a conversation with somebody about a go-pro, and planted it into a gap he needed to fill here. All just moo
I'm kinda leaning that way myself. I don't know if it was two initially but, I think at some point, a 2nd person came into the fold.
Not too many people could get Nancy Grace to give them 1 minute of exposure to get their child's story out there. And what did he do? He lied on national tv to people about when he last seen her. He basically lied on the missing persons report as well for letting mom think 730 am was the last time seen. Iam surprised the interviewer didn't follow up on him about the gas station meet up and which gas station and why the mpr says 7am , etc etc.
Nancy Grace would have zoomed in on that immediately. Jmo
Cutting up the card could also be a way to make it look like someone "huffed off" and wanted to basically say, "now you can't track me..."
Since unlike a DL, ATM/debit/credit card transactions can be traced, whereas unless a DL is run it's not going to provide an electronic 'footprint.'
If someone wanted to make it look like someone took off voluntarily and perhaps in a huff and wanting to make it look like they didn't want to be found, leaving behind their traceable items such as ATM/debit/credit cards or electronics like a phone or computer, could 'make a statement.'
Where as leaving behind a DL or cutting up/destroying a DL wouldn't make the same statement if someone wanted to try to 'set a scene.' It'd only mean if the person took off they'd be driving without a license and nothing about making it easier or more difficult to locate them.
I could certainly see someone trying to not only plant 'evidence' in various places to steer an investigation certain ways (or certain it AWAY from certain places) or to try to steer it to focus on (or away from) certain people, they can equally try to plant certain evidence to try to steer the investigation toward a particular way of thing (runaway vs. victim, or stranger abduction vs. known abductor, etc.)
Could it be as simple as wanting to sound like such a good, devoted "dad" to AJ that he would spend hours learning about something she wanted and then hand over the money for it as well. It's like he's writing a book and he's the main character.
I've wondered why he stressed the go pro so much, too. There may be more to it. I wish I was smart enough to make a connection. But all I can come up with is at one point he had a conversation with somebody about a go-pro, and planted it into a gap he needed to fill here. All just moo
Why was it so important to say it took him hours? What was so sensitive to WH about a gopro? There's a nugget in there somewhere but I can't figure it out. Was it all smoke and mirrors to explain the money? If so, then why??
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=gopro