pokypuppy67
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2014
- Messages
- 130
- Reaction score
- 6
I did call the investigators at Jane Doe's end of things today. I want to understand where the breakdown in follow-through is on this case. Not to impose judgement, just to try and grease the wheels a little, or to caulk a few cracks to keep her from falling through. Things COULD be held up because the primary investigator on the case has retired within recent years. I talked to a guy in Major Crimes, gave him Shirley's name to look into. He didn't seem particularly interested in our Jane Doe, though. Said he'd pass the information along.
Looking at NamUs I was touched to see how hard somebody had worked to try and ID her. There are ONE HUNDRED AND SEVENTY-THREE exclusions...173!!! Shirley Sprang isn't among them, by the way. I hadn't thought to check the exclusion list before (drat that), though I would have been beyond shocked to find her on it.
She probably hasn't been considered because of the date discrepancy. And that discrepancy is intriguing because, while it appears to rule her out, it is the very thing that has caught people's' attention and linked the two cases together in the first place. Kind of ironic. They've really been trying hard to ID her, though. And yeah, she may not have wanted to be identified...unless her suicide wasn't really a suicide, then IDing her would likely be exactly who I want. Detective Steve Milefsky was previously working the case. He had kept her ashes in his office on a shelf, had taped a picture of her to her "urn" and looked at it every single day. Now that he's off the case, it concerns me about what they did with her remains. He couldn't stand the thoughts of her being locked away in an evidence room. I respect the guy highly for that.
They didn't bury her as requested; probably too costly. Perhaps she underestimated the costs...or maybe her money had to be kept as evidence since the case hasn't been closed. Does anybody know what it would have cost, in general, to bury cremated remains in a cemetery? There's probably a lot of variation; I just wonder if her $50 was realistic. It would be interesting to see if she had done her research well into the costs that she would incur; whether her $50 each was a reasonable expectation of costs for cremation and for a burial plot. Does anybody know?
Interesting bit of info: human remains are handled differently across the country. Some places treat them with solemn respect...some states/counties actually throw them away in a landfill. That sickens me. Even if their budget for burial was absolute zero, there HAD to be a more respectful "disposal" option than tossing human beings away like garbage. A tiny ceremony...just a few words or a quick prayer, by even one person...SOMETHING to honor them in death...ANYTHING...even pouring their ashes down a PVC pipe into a mass grave (hole in the ground) would still be better than dumping these human beings in landfills with our daily rotting garbage. Everybody is somebody's child. Somebody loved them!
And even today some counties STILL discard deceased people in landfills. One county I read about only keeps the remains for a month before "trashing" them. Their families may not even be aware that they were missing yet in that short amount of time. That completely SUCKS! There's no unified method of handling human remains, apparently. It varies from county to county, state to state.
I wish we could find a respectable solution to this problem. But I don't think most people even know it's happening. I sure didn't know. Now that I do, it infuriates and saddens me. If one of my family members died and our county officials threw them away in the trash, like they were nothing...I don't even know. I don't know what I would do. It's just SO wrong!!!
Sorry... down off my soapbox. It's just that it hurts my heart so badly that this is being done. People's lives, and deaths, should not be devalued...and in such a heartless manner.
Looking at NamUs I was touched to see how hard somebody had worked to try and ID her. There are ONE HUNDRED AND SEVENTY-THREE exclusions...173!!! Shirley Sprang isn't among them, by the way. I hadn't thought to check the exclusion list before (drat that), though I would have been beyond shocked to find her on it.
She probably hasn't been considered because of the date discrepancy. And that discrepancy is intriguing because, while it appears to rule her out, it is the very thing that has caught people's' attention and linked the two cases together in the first place. Kind of ironic. They've really been trying hard to ID her, though. And yeah, she may not have wanted to be identified...unless her suicide wasn't really a suicide, then IDing her would likely be exactly who I want. Detective Steve Milefsky was previously working the case. He had kept her ashes in his office on a shelf, had taped a picture of her to her "urn" and looked at it every single day. Now that he's off the case, it concerns me about what they did with her remains. He couldn't stand the thoughts of her being locked away in an evidence room. I respect the guy highly for that.
They didn't bury her as requested; probably too costly. Perhaps she underestimated the costs...or maybe her money had to be kept as evidence since the case hasn't been closed. Does anybody know what it would have cost, in general, to bury cremated remains in a cemetery? There's probably a lot of variation; I just wonder if her $50 was realistic. It would be interesting to see if she had done her research well into the costs that she would incur; whether her $50 each was a reasonable expectation of costs for cremation and for a burial plot. Does anybody know?
Interesting bit of info: human remains are handled differently across the country. Some places treat them with solemn respect...some states/counties actually throw them away in a landfill. That sickens me. Even if their budget for burial was absolute zero, there HAD to be a more respectful "disposal" option than tossing human beings away like garbage. A tiny ceremony...just a few words or a quick prayer, by even one person...SOMETHING to honor them in death...ANYTHING...even pouring their ashes down a PVC pipe into a mass grave (hole in the ground) would still be better than dumping these human beings in landfills with our daily rotting garbage. Everybody is somebody's child. Somebody loved them!
And even today some counties STILL discard deceased people in landfills. One county I read about only keeps the remains for a month before "trashing" them. Their families may not even be aware that they were missing yet in that short amount of time. That completely SUCKS! There's no unified method of handling human remains, apparently. It varies from county to county, state to state.
I wish we could find a respectable solution to this problem. But I don't think most people even know it's happening. I sure didn't know. Now that I do, it infuriates and saddens me. If one of my family members died and our county officials threw them away in the trash, like they were nothing...I don't even know. I don't know what I would do. It's just SO wrong!!!
Sorry... down off my soapbox. It's just that it hurts my heart so badly that this is being done. People's lives, and deaths, should not be devalued...and in such a heartless manner.