You keep repeating that he painted a false picture. What evidence do you have he wasn't actually making coffee? He got the time wrong? If he didn't know when the woman saw him, then he could have innocently gotten the time wrong. The original story was that the woman was cutting through the property to get to the bus stop. You say that is false, she wasn't on the property? It might be that many people cut through the property to get to the bus stop, but that doesn't make the story that the woman cut through the property false. If you have information that in fact she was not on the property, why not post it?
In answer to your first question, he's the one who said he was making coffee when he was seen. I have no idea why he said that. I suspect he said it because it sounds like the first thing someone would do when they stumble out of bed.
I have posted many links to his story and the other version, some links more than once. At some point, I decided to quit posting them because nobody seemed to be reading any of the links. The statement from the woman was that she was on the walkway that goes by his carport. It connects the park behind his house with the sidewalk in front of his house.
His early stories. (Bold letters are mine):
Williamson said [A] his roommates were not home and he walked into the kitchen to make coffee about 5:30 a.m. Monday. [C] At about that time, an unidentified woman walking with a 7-year-old boy passed the front yard of Williamson's home.
http://www.kmbc.com/newslinks/21368405/detail.html
"Yes, I wasn't wearing any clothes but I was alone, in my own home and [D] just got out of bed.
[E] It was dark and I had no idea anyone was outside looking in at me," Williamson said.
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/10/22/crimesider/entry5409509.shtml
So, that's the first story that started everyone screaming that the woman was a peeping tom and a tresspasser.Williamson said: "I'm by myself. So I come down here - the roommates are gone, and it's my house. "I never had a conversation with anyone, never saw anyone. Didn't cross my mind, came and got coffee. I mean if I stood and seemed comfortable in my kitchen possibly it's natural. It's my kitchen." http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Wo...ed-In-His-Own-Kitchen/Article/200910315410967
Then more information came out.
Okay, so how did he just get up at 5:30 all alone in the house (A, B, and D) if his roommates saw him up and drunk at 5:00? How was he seen making coffee naked at 5:30 (C) and how was it dark outside (E), if the incident happened at 8:30?FOX 5 also spoke with some of Williamson's roommates, and they said they believed Eric was drunk on Monday morning when they were all leaving for work around 5 a.m. The alleged exposure happened around 8:30 a.m.
http://www.myfoxdc.com/dpp/news/local/102109_naked_man_arrested_after_making_coffee_update
Then his story changes somewhat:
But we've already seen that his reason for being naked wasn't that no one was home. He was also naked while his roommates were there. Don't know why he keeps insisting that he decided to do things naked because he was alone."I was in my own home, cooking breakfast, making coffee, packing a box," he said. He says he was moving out. And because no one was home-- he was doing it naked. http://www.wzzm13.com/news/watercooler/story.aspx?storyid=114952&catid=82
If he didn't know he was being seen by anyone, how would he know this woman walked across a portion of his lawn? He's got to be lying about one or the other or both. Also, even if she had walked across the lawn (which I doubt), it wasn't his lawn any more than it was her lawn. It was being rented by the company he had gotten fired from. He was an ex-tenant in the process of moving out."Apparently some lady had walked across a portion of my lawn, because there's a trail off to the side a ways and its common for people to cut across that area to the sidewalk in front of my house," he said. http://www.wzzm13.com/news/watercooler/story.aspx?storyid=114952&catid=82
Then his story gets even farther away than his original:
Wonder if he believed it was "a good possibility" that the school kids at the bus stop or "walking down the road" to the bus stop could see him?"We wake up to Eric running around the house with nothing but a work hardhat on, butt naked," the roommate said.
"I was upstairs, downstairs without clothes on for several hours," Williamson told NBC4 Wednesday. "And then I ended up putting pants on when I guess that act got old I ended up putting some pants on."
Williamson said he doesn't have an exact time frame for when he was naked and when he was clothed.
"If she's walking down the road and she said she saw me naked, it's a good possibility," he said.
http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/l...er-Being-Seen-Naked-in-His-Home-65316082.html
Now all this has been his and his roommates version. The woman's version is:
Spokeswoman Mary Ann Jennings said the woman and her son first saw Williamson standing naked inside his doorway as they walked along a path outside his home.
Police say Williamson then followed the two from inside his home and exposed himself again through a large front window.
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/10/22/crimesider/entry5409509.shtml
Mary Ann Jennings with Fairfax County Police says it's not that Eric was naked. He's in trouble because they say he was flaunting it.
"He wasn't merely moving around the house. He was actually standing in an open doorway and standing in front of a pretty large window when she observed him naked," she said.http://www.wzzm13.com/news/watercooler/story.aspx?storyid=114952&catid=82
As officers tell it, the 45-year-old woman, the wife of a Fairfax police officer, was walking her son to school about 8:40 a.m. along a well-traveled path between public tennis courts and the house where Williamson had been living for three months when a noise drew her attention to a side door.
That's when she first noticed Williamson standing nude in the doorway, she said. When she and her son got to the sidewalk in front of the house on Arley Drive, they saw him again -- this time, through a large window that appeared to have no drapes.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dy...10/25/AR2009102502468.html?hpid=moreheadlines