Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I respect that they may have something, but ugh...without anything more than "This is what he is wanted for" and looking at all LE has done already, that something could be anything unfortunately. I mean...what if they found sex toys in his apartment? That would lead them to believe he was interested in a sex crime. But have they linked that to Hannah? Dunno...for now.
What sort of evidence would bring about an attempt to defile charge? Seems mostly linked to prostitution so do they have some sort of evidence of that?
They always do. You can't winnow out false confessions or conduct effective interviews if all the facts are shared with the public. It's frustrating, but it has to be that way.Well there you go..I think it's safe to say now that LE has a lot more evidence than we know about...
What exactly is abduction with intent to defile?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Intent to defile opens up possibility of a sex ring- yes? According to the definition of what the charge means above anyway.
have you not been on the forum for the last few days?
Wow, that could be true- did they say abduction and attempt to defile in relation to Hannah? Did they mention her name?
So this means LE in this case has more against JM than LE's had against: Terri Horman, the Ramseys, the Irwins, Sergio Celis, etc....and I know there are people who don't think some of those people are guilty...but it just makes you go...hmmm...
Date rape drugs found?
i think its attempt till they find the body basically (or until they get a DNA match on him to some other cases).
Mine as well. Sounds to me like these charges are not for Hannah, but are related to another victim of attempted rape that has come forward. They now have something more concrete to press charges for. (jmo, of course)
http://www.rgmorganlaw.com/sexcrimes.html
This particular statute appends a specific mental state to the above definition, that of the abductor doing the abduction with the intent to defile (commit rape, carnal knowledge, sodomy, object sexual penetration) or to place a child under 16 into prostitution.
The act of the abduction isn’t necessarily actually transporting the victim, and it would seem that the abductor could simply “deprive that person [the victim] of liberty” in the exact same spot where they met. The abductor can even transport the purported victim to an isolated location without any apparent protest from the victim. The prosecution must then prove the abductor’s mental state, i.e. the abductor took the victim to the other place for the purpose of being able to commit his sex crime without fear of being caught.
A specific example of “abduction with the intent to defile”: The abductor observes somebody at a convenience store in the process of shoplifting. The abductor approaches the victim and pretends to be store security, then transports the victim to an isolated location and commits a rape.
Abuction with Intent to Defile is a Class 2 Felony, punishable 20 years to life in prison and/or a fines of up to $100,000. This punishment would be in addition to the jury’s recommended punishment for the underlying sex offense, i.e. rape, carnal knowledge, sodomy, object sexual penetration). This offense can pertain to victims who are either an adult or a juvenile
The most horrible thing about this statute is that it can tack 20 years of minimum-mandatory prison onto what may have been a relatively-low jury sentence for the sex offense. For example, I once had a jury for a rape in one jurisdiction which found my client guilty and gave him 5 years of prison time, the absolute minimum sentence. Then, the second jury in the jurisdiction from which the victim was abducted found him guilty of the abduction and had to give him the 20 years minimum mandatory.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk