VA - Johnny Depp's defamation case against ex Amber Heard, who countersued #13

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
I am going to watch the dateline show. I suspect it will be shown that SG is not buying into what Amber is putting down. I don't think this interview is really going to do AH any favors. SG may not come down hard on AH like many may want but I think she will leave the audience again convinced that AH has problems and is not to be believed.
 
I am going to watch the dateline show. I suspect it will be shown that SG is not buying into what Amber is putting down. I don't think this interview is really going to do AH any favors. SG may not come down hard on AH like many may want but I think she will leave the audience again convinced that AH has problems and is not to be believed.
I agree. I normally leave the TV on NBC until 9am while I'm working. But I changed it this morning. I am not a fan of SG but I've read on social media that she didn't seem to go along with AH.
 
In the US we call that extortion, which is generally a felony criminal offense.

She really isn't going to leave this poor guy alone, is she? Ever. I wonder how many times she watched Fatal Attraction, cheering Glenn Close all the way? This woman is frightening. IMO
I’m becoming fearful she will pull a Jodi Arias if given the chance. Thank goodness JD has body guards.
 
Instead of watching Dateline, I will be downloading Edward Scissorhands from somewhere, anywhere, happily paying a rental fee. I hope others will join in the Johnny Depp watch party which conveniently happens opposite
Dateline. I hope the numbers might be big enough to matter and somehow the entertainment powers that be will notice.
 
[…]

Now, New York-based entertainment lawyer Nicole Haff, who works at Romano Law, has revealed exclusively to DailyMail.com how Heard's comments could well backfire - and result in her getting sued by the Pirates of the Caribbean star once again.

'Yes. This interview could count as a new “publication” under the law, which could spur a third lawsuit,' the attorney explained, when asked if Depp could sue Heard for defamation over her Today interview.

According to MincLaw.com, 'An individual who repeats or republishes defamation will be subject to the same liability as the publisher of the original defamatory material,' something known as republishing.

'A defamatory statement is considered “published” when it is communicated either intentionally, with actual malice or reckless disregard, or negligently, to someone other than the person being defamed,' the company added. 'The statement must also be reasonably understood by the recipient to be false.'

However, Haff added that she isn't sure it would be a smart move for Depp to pursue a third trial against Heard, adding: 'Heard’s lawyers have already stated that she cannot pay the original judgment.'

DailyMail.com has reached out to Depp's legal team for comment.
'


[…]

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
241
Guests online
333
Total visitors
574

Forum statistics

Threads
608,670
Messages
18,243,715
Members
234,418
Latest member
May4th to Feb13th Blessed
Back
Top