VA - Johnny Depp's defamation case against ex Amber Heard, who countersued #13

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
  • 'Says the lawyer for the man who convinced the world he had scissors for fingers,' Heard hit back. 'I'm the performer? I had listened to weeks of testimony insinuating, or saying quite directly, that I'm a terrible actress. So I'm a bit confused how I could be both.'
RSBM
Lol, Eve Barlow stuck that one into a very recent tweet.

At the time I speculated that this was an effort to avoid saying anything defamatory.

Clearly she didn't think it up herself: because I'm almost positive Eve's coaching would have involved mentioning WHY she used this elocution, but of course truth challenged Amber cannot resist adding a tearful... "he hit me... and I will say so until my dying day!"

Well, I'm sure he hopes devoutly that day will be soon now, lol... and by the way, welcome to the new gag order Camille will be introducing any day now...

Maybe this will erase the taste from some people's Mouths:

YES! I knew I'd just read that somewhere else not too long ago!
Typical...
1. She steals SA story from assistant
2. She steals which side of the bathroom door she was on
3. She now has to steal insults
 
Instead of watching Dateline, I will be downloading Edward Scissorhands from somewhere, anywhere, happily paying a rental fee. I hope others will join in the Johnny Depp watch party which conveniently happens opposite
Dateline. I hope the numbers might be big enough to matter and somehow the entertainment powers that be will notice.
I think people have already started. I typed the single letter "E" on my Roku TV search bar and it immediately popped Edward Scissorhands to the top spot of the search result.
 
The more i watch her, the more i realize there's one thing i really love about her... Her EX-husband!

MOO JMOO
Something occurred to me and wondered if anyone else felt the same.

Aside from the typical "ownership of/possession of/authority over" people already expressed from people like her, does anyone get the feeling that AH feels more entitled to run her yap because they actually married? As if she expects society to give more weight to what she has to say than his previous partners because, well, he didn't marry them. She is more "special" than WR, KM, VP because he married her.

Oh, he did marry that one person (LD) a long, long, long time ago, but she's friends with that "rando" from Hicksville that wears a mesh shirt and wasn't ever there, so I guess she doesn't count either...?

The way she talks about his kids, it comes across as she is more entitled to speak about them as well, more so than their own mother because, well, he never married her.

MOO
 

Amber Heard is getting thrown into the lion’s den after a snippet of her upcoming NBC interview was released on Tuesday.

The 36-year-old’s first sit-down interview since losing her defamation trial against ex-husband Johnny Depp will air Friday, June 17, and fans are not happy with Heard once again.
 
Transcript of Heard interview.

Part 1.

Interviewer
: It's been about more than a week since the verdict. As you sit here with me now, has it sunk in?

Amber: How could it? Surreal and difficult in part, yes. This has been a long time coming.

Interviewer: Do you stand by your testimony and your accusations against Johnny Depp about abuse?

Amber: Of course, to my dying day, will stand by every word of my testimony.

Amber: I think the vast majority of this trial was played out on social media. I think that this trial is an example of that gone haywire, gone amok, and the juries not immune to that.

Interviewer: Do you think the jury saw it?

Amber: How could they not? I think even the most well intentioned juror...it would have been impossible to avoid this.

Amber: Every single day, I passed 3, 4, sometimes 6 blocks. City blocks lined with people holding signs saying 'burn the witch', 'death to Amber'. After 3 1/5 weeks, I took the stand and saw just a courtroom packed full of Captain Jack Sparrow fans who were vocal, energised...

Interviewer: Can you put into words how that felt?

Amber: This was the most humiliating and horrible thing I've ever been through. I have never felt more removed from my own humanity. I felt less than human.

Interviewer: Let's go back to the day of the verdict. Were you feeling confident?

Amber: That's a great question. I wish I could say yes to that, I want to say yes to you, but it wouldn't be true. Even if you think that I'm lying, you still couldn't tell me, look me in the eye, and tell me you think on social media that there's been a fair representation.

Amber: There was another trial handled...dealt with the same substitive?? (Heard invents a new word!) issues, that has even more evidence in, in fact, my evidence was largely kept out. Really important pieces of evidence, kept out. Done differently, handled differently by a judge instead of a jury.

Interviewer: Some evidence is admissible in a UK court, that is not admissible in a US court. Do you think that maybe he just had better lawyers?

Amber: I will say, his lawyers did certainly a better job of distracting the jury from the real issues.

Interviewer: For some people, they just were frankly disgusted by the whole thing. They don't have much sympathy for either one of you. Can you understand that?

Amber: Absolutely. I would not blame the average person for looking at this and how it's been covered, and not think that it is Hollywood brats at their worst. But what people don't understand is, it's actually so much bigger than that. This is not only about our 1st amendment right to speak.....

Interviewer: But here's the thing about the 1st amendment - The 1st amendment protects free speech, it doesn't protect lies that amount to defamation. And that was the issue in the case.

Amber: Yes, exactly. You can't go into...free speech does not protect you, you know, if you go into a crowded theatre and you scream "fire". We get the concept of free speech from the Greeks. My understanding of what that means is not just a freedom to speak, it's a freedom to speak truth to power.

Interviewer: But truth is the word, and that was the issue.

Amber: Yes, and that's all I spoke, and I spoke it to power, and I paid the price.

Interviewer: In the closing arguments, the Depp lawyer said...called your testimony "the performance of a lifetime", and said you were acting. What do you say to that?

Amber: Says the lawyer, for the man who convinced the world he had scissors for fingers. I'm the performer? I had listened to weeks of testimony, insinuating that, or saying quite directly, you know, that I'm a terrible actress, so I'm a bit confused how I could be both.

Interviewer: The Depp team argued that you were the abuser, that you instigated physical violence. Did you?

Amber: I never had to instigate it, I responded to it. When you're living in violent and it becomes normal, as I testified to. You have to adapt.

Interviewer: You say you were responding but there is evidence, there are tapes in which you acknowledge hitting. There are tapes in which you say "I started the fight".

Amber: I know much has been made of these audio tapes. They were first leaked online after being edited. What you would hear in those clips are not evidence of what was happening. It was evidence of a negotiation, of how to talk about that with your abuser.

Interviewer: But I'm looking at a transcript that says - He says "you start physical fights", and you say "I did start a physical fight, I can't promise you I won't get physical again". I mean this is in black and white, I understand context. But you're testifying and telling me today "I never started a physical fight", and here you are on tape saying you did.

Amber: As I testified on the stand about this, is that when your life is at risk, not only will you take the blame for things that you shouldn't take the blame for, but when you're in a abusive dynamic, psychologically, emotionally and physically, you don't have the resources that you say - you or I do with the luxury of saying this is black and white, because it's anything but when you're living in it.

Interviewer: But then there are other times...there's another tape where you're taunting him and saying "Oh tell the world, Johnny Depp, I a man, am the victim of domestic violence".

Amber: 20 second clips, or the transcripts of them, are not representative of even the 2 hours or the 3 hours that those clips are excerpt from.

Interviewer: Could your side have just put the whole 3 hours in then?

Amber: I'm not a lawyer. As I testified to, I was talking in those recordings as a person, in extreme amount of emotional, psychological and physical distress....

Interviewer: He says he never hit you. Never. Is that lie?

Amber: Yes it is.

Interviewer: What about the witnesses who said they have seen you instigate physical violence?

Amber: I've seen first hand how people will file rank and support the person they depend on.

Interviewer: Did they all come in and lie in court?

Amber: I am not here to call any of his witnesses any names. I'm here to just kind of talk about it from what it felt like for me as a person who sat there.

Interviewer: When I asked his lawyers "why do you think you won?", and the answer I got was "because she never took responsibility for anything she did in the marriage".

Amber: I did do and say horrible, regrettable things throughout my relationship. I behaved in a horrible, almost unrecognisable to myself ways. There's so much....I have so much regret. I freely and openly and voluntarily talked about what I did. I talked about the horrible language, I talked about being pushed to the extent where I didn't even know the difference between, you know, right and wrong. I will always continue to feel like I was a part of this, like I was the other half of this relationship, because I was. And it was ugly, and could be very beautiful. It was very very toxic, we were awful to each other, you know I made a lot of, a lot of mistakes. A lot of mistakes, but I've always told the truth.
 
I love the theatrical release poster. AH honestly chose the worst movie to pick at Johnny about. "The story of an uncommonly gentle man", indeed.
View attachment 349385
Image from: Edward Scissorhands - Wikipedia
I saw this when it hit the theaters. My absolute favorite and I thought it should be a Christmas classic. Not sure why I thought that then. I think there is snow and Christmas moments.

anyway, if you haven’t seen it, see it !
 
Something occurred to me and wondered if anyone else felt the same.

Aside from the typical "ownership of/possession of/authority over" people already expressed from people like her, does anyone get the feeling that AH feels more entitled to run her yap because they actually married? As if she expects society to give more weight to what she has to say than his previous partners because, well, he didn't marry them. She is more "special" than WR, KM, VP because he married her.

Oh, he did marry that one person (LD) a long, long, long time ago, but she's friends with that "rando" from Hicksville that wears a mesh shirt and wasn't ever there, so I guess she doesn't count either...?

The way she talks about his kids, it comes across as she is more entitled to speak about them as well, more so than their own mother because, well, he never married her.

MOO
Did she not say what goes on between closed doors is not for the average person to know in their former relationship yet here she is still speaking it to the world full of average people.
I don't think JD's daughter liked Amber. From what I understand his daughter did not attend the wedding because of her dislike for Amber. I don't know what the son thought of her.
 
Last edited:
Transcript of Heard interview.

Part 1.

Interviewer
: It's been about more than a week since the verdict. As you sit here with me now, has it sunk in?

Amber: How could it? Surreal and difficult in part, yes. This has been a long time coming.

Interviewer: Do you stand by your testimony and your accusations against Johnny Depp about abuse?

Amber: Of course, to my dying day, will stand by every word of my testimony.

Amber: I think the vast majority of this trial was played out on social media. I think that this trial is an example of that gone haywire, gone amok, and the juries not immune to that.

Interviewer: Do you think the jury saw it?

Amber: How could they not? I think even the most well intentioned juror...it would have been impossible to avoid this.

Amber: Every single day, I passed 3, 4, sometimes 6 blocks. City blocks lined with people holding signs saying 'burn the witch', 'death to Amber'. After 3 1/5 weeks, I took the stand and saw just a courtroom packed full of Captain Jack Sparrow fans who were vocal, energised...

Interviewer: Can you put into words how that felt?

Amber: This was the most humiliating and horrible thing I've ever been through. I have never felt more removed from my own humanity. I felt less than human.

Interviewer: Let's go back to the day of the verdict. Were you feeling confident?

Amber: That's a great question. I wish I could say yes to that, I want to say yes to you, but it wouldn't be true. Even if you think that I'm lying, you still couldn't tell me, look me in the eye, and tell me you think on social media that there's been a fair representation.

Amber: There was another trial handled...dealt with the same substitive?? (Heard invents a new word!) issues, that has even more evidence in, in fact, my evidence was largely kept out. Really important pieces of evidence, kept out. Done differently, handled differently by a judge instead of a jury.

Interviewer: Some evidence is admissible in a UK court, that is not admissible in a US court. Do you think that maybe he just had better lawyers?

Amber: I will say, his lawyers did certainly a better job of distracting the jury from the real issues.

Interviewer: For some people, they just were frankly disgusted by the whole thing. They don't have much sympathy for either one of you. Can you understand that?

Amber: Absolutely. I would not blame the average person for looking at this and how it's been covered, and not think that it is Hollywood brats at their worst. But what people don't understand is, it's actually so much bigger than that. This is not only about our 1st amendment right to speak.....

Interviewer: But here's the thing about the 1st amendment - The 1st amendment protects free speech, it doesn't protect lies that amount to defamation. And that was the issue in the case.

Amber: Yes, exactly. You can't go into...free speech does not protect you, you know, if you go into a crowded theatre and you scream "fire". We get the concept of free speech from the Greeks. My understanding of what that means is not just a freedom to speak, it's a freedom to speak truth to power.

Interviewer: But truth is the word, and that was the issue.

Amber: Yes, and that's all I spoke, and I spoke it to power, and I paid the price.

Interviewer: In the closing arguments, the Depp lawyer said...called your testimony "the performance of a lifetime", and said you were acting. What do you say to that?

Amber: Says the lawyer, for the man who convinced the world he had scissors for fingers. I'm the performer? I had listened to weeks of testimony, insinuating that, or saying quite directly, you know, that I'm a terrible actress, so I'm a bit confused how I could be both.

Interviewer: The Depp team argued that you were the abuser, that you instigated physical violence. Did you?

Amber: I never had to instigate it, I responded to it. When you're living in violent and it becomes normal, as I testified to. You have to adapt.

Interviewer: You say you were responding but there is evidence, there are tapes in which you acknowledge hitting. There are tapes in which you say "I started the fight".

Amber: I know much has been made of these audio tapes. They were first leaked online after being edited. What you would hear in those clips are not evidence of what was happening. It was evidence of a negotiation, of how to talk about that with your abuser.

Interviewer: But I'm looking at a transcript that says - He says "you start physical fights", and you say "I did start a physical fight, I can't promise you I won't get physical again". I mean this is in black and white, I understand context. But you're testifying and telling me today "I never started a physical fight", and here you are on tape saying you did.

Amber: As I testified on the stand about this, is that when your life is at risk, not only will you take the blame for things that you shouldn't take the blame for, but when you're in a abusive dynamic, psychologically, emotionally and physically, you don't have the resources that you say - you or I do with the luxury of saying this is black and white, because it's anything but when you're living in it.

Interviewer: But then there are other times...there's another tape where you're taunting him and saying "Oh tell the world, Johnny Depp, I a man, am the victim of domestic violence".

Amber: 20 second clips, or the transcripts of them, are not representative of even the 2 hours or the 3 hours that those clips are excerpt from.

Interviewer: Could your side have just put the whole 3 hours in then?

Amber: I'm not a lawyer. As I testified to, I was talking in those recordings as a person, in extreme amount of emotional, psychological and physical distress....

Interviewer: He says he never hit you. Never. Is that lie?

Amber: Yes it is.

Interviewer: What about the witnesses who said they have seen you instigate physical violence?

Amber: I've seen first hand how people will file rank and support the person they depend on.

Interviewer: Did they all come in and lie in court?

Amber: I am not here to call any of his witnesses any names. I'm here to just kind of talk about it from what it felt like for me as a person who sat there.

Interviewer: When I asked his lawyers "why do you think you won?", and the answer I got was "because she never took responsibility for anything she did in the marriage".

Amber: I did do and say horrible, regrettable things throughout my relationship. I behaved in a horrible, almost unrecognisable to myself ways. There's so much....I have so much regret. I freely and openly and voluntarily talked about what I did. I talked about the horrible language, I talked about being pushed to the extent where I didn't even know the difference between, you know, right and wrong. I will always continue to feel like I was a part of this, like I was the other half of this relationship, because I was. And it was ugly, and could be very beautiful. It was very very toxic, we were awful to each other, you know I made a lot of, a lot of mistakes. A lot of mistakes, but I've always told the truth.

Where is this from?
 
Amber: There was another trial handled...dealt with the same substitive?? (Heard invents a new word!)
"Substitive"... That's our old Amber, she invented bruises, broken noses, broken bottles, abuse claims, rumors and now words. She ticked all the narcissist, sociopath, and psychopath boxes. Can't wait to see what's next...

JMO based on my experience dealing with people who also ticked all those boxes.

MOO MOO MOO
 
Did she not say what goes on between closed doors is not for the average person to know in their former relationship yet here she is still speaking it to the world full of average people.
I don't think JD's daughter liked Amber. From what I understand his daughter did not attend the wedding because of her dislike for Amber. I don't know what the son thought of her.
She cant twist what went on behind closed doors. The recordings are out there and what amazing me is the restraint JD had. I would have left or throat punched her. In the coward one, it went on forever and ever. She sounded like a lunatic. jmo.
 
Guys, i think I found the problem:


I think the sweet summer child still thinks this is the case...

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 40% of American Adults believe, based on what they know about the case involving accusations of domestic abuse, that Depp is probably telling the truth. Just 10% think Heard is probably telling the truth. Fifty-one percent (51%) are undecided. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

What I didn't specifically mention is that the above is dated from April, aka pre trial. I wonder what it would say now? Does she still think half the world is up for public opinion grabs?
 
She cant twist what went on behind closed doors. The recordings are out there and what amazing me is the restraint JD had. I would have left or throat punched her. In the coward one, it went on forever and ever. She sounded like a lunatic. jmo.
But she's apparently trying... vomiting all over Savannah 'but the tapes were still edited'.

Yes... yours!!
 
(Sorry if already posted).

She's been cut!! (They are saying it's info from a tabloidy "source," but it has been being discussed on Twitter, and it's the first "MSM" source I've seen confirm it.)

 
Thank you for obviating me from the need to watch this preview in person!
No worries :) .

The thing is, I thought it was a preview, yet NBC are saying it's Part 1.

It was heavily edited I noticed, so I'm just hoping Friday's edition is the full unedited version (as unedited as it can be, anyway!).

I'm a stickler for context.
 
(Sorry if already posted).

She's been cut!! (They are saying it's info from a tabloidy "source," but it has been being discussed on Twitter, and it's the first "MSM" source I've seen confirm it.)

Wish I could double like this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
252
Guests online
315
Total visitors
567

Forum statistics

Threads
608,671
Messages
18,243,752
Members
234,419
Latest member
Jaygirl21785
Back
Top