Updated flyer. Follow case updates here: https://www.facebook.com/share/g/KD5bre7rWpE47SGH/This is the recent missing person flyer for Mamta
#Justice4Mamta
Updated flyer. Follow case updates here: https://www.facebook.com/share/g/KD5bre7rWpE47SGH/This is the recent missing person flyer for Mamta
^^rsbmThe defense is downplaying the blood evidence. There was pooling and splatter, and somewhere there's an article that states the bed was moved to cover a bloodstain. I'll see if I can find it. MOO
How can they confirm who "the pools of blood" belong to when "they don't have DNA on the blood evidence yet?"^^rsbm
Last I read, they don't have DNA on the blood evidence yet! So bizarre investigators still can't/won't confirm if the pools of blood found in the house belong to the victim.
No need to apologize. Your reply was not confusing at all, and hopefully @gitana1 will weigh in.Yes, but unless I am misreading your post, none of that explains the discrepancy in what the defense says as opposed to what prosecution says. In fact, it only heightens it. How can defense say the blood found is what could be found in any typical home, if they've heard what we've heard about what investigators found? You say the defense is downplaying the blood evidence. Aren't they LYING about the blood evidence? I thought attorneys weren't allowed to lie. Oh, wait, that only applies in court, I guess?
OK, well, then there's your explanation, imo, gitana1 (who originally posed these questions). But since OP is a lawyer him or herself, you already knew this. So do you find it unethical for his defense attorney to be saying this to the media? Or is this pretty much par for the course (it may be both as well). But since you posed the question, it seems like you might find it surprising?
ETA sorry, I know I've combined my replies to both pommymommy and gitana1 into this one reply, so hope it's not confusing. Also, I know there's a way to tag, if that's the correct term, another user's name within a post, so that they will see it, but I don't know how to do that. Or I would.
^^rsbm
Last I read, they don't have DNA on the blood evidence yet! So bizarre investigators still can't/won't confirm if the pools of blood found in the house belong to the victim.
How can they confirm who "the pools of blood" belong to when "they don't have DNA on the blood evidence yet?"
It’s so bizarre to me when defense attorneys make outrageous statements like one pretending that a huge amount of evidence doesn’t exist. For some reason, they must think this tactic works on a potential jury pool because they do it so often.The defense is downplaying the blood evidence. There was pooling and splatter, and somewhere there's an article that states the bed was moved to cover a bloodstain. I'll see if I can find it. MOO
A few photos here:
New photo evidence released in Mamta Kafle Bhatt's disappearance
New photo evidence in Naresh Bhatt's court documents shows what appears to be blood stains from the Manassas Park home.www.fox5dc.com
Police found evidence that a body had been dragged, and large amounts of blood were evident at the home of Mamta Kafle Bhatt, according to court documents from her husband's arraignment Friday morning.Evidence shows large amounts of blood, and a body had been dragged from the home of Mamta Kafle Bhatt
Court documents say police found a substantial amount of digital and forensic evidence.www.wusa9.com
Investigators say they found the Bhatt home in disarray, with evidence of blood mainly in the primary bedroom and corresponding bathroom.
ETA:
After completing their search warrant, investigators found what appeared to be blood pooling and blood splatter in the home’s main bedroom; the bed appeared to be moved, blocking a closet; light pink stains were found on bedroom carpeting after the bed was removed; and pools of blood were found in the bathroom “as if something was dragged across the floor,” along with blood pooling on the shower floor, WJLA reported from Friday’s arraignment.
When investigators removed the bathtub, they saw what they believed to be blood in the caulking of the bathtub, WJLA reported.
Yes I find it unethical and I agree it’s straight lying. I don’t get how a professional can lie like that with a straight face.Yes, but unless I am misreading your post, none of that explains the discrepancy in what the defense says as opposed to what prosecution says. In fact, it only heightens it. How can defense say the blood found is what could be found in any typical home, if they've heard what we've heard about what investigators found? You say the defense is downplaying the blood evidence. Aren't they LYING about the blood evidence? I thought attorneys weren't allowed to lie. Oh, wait, that only applies in court, I guess?
OK, well, then there's your explanation, imo, gitana1 (who originally posed these questions). But since OP is a lawyer him or herself, you already knew this. So do you find it unethical for his defense attorney to be saying this to the media? Or is this pretty much par for the course (it may be both as well). But since you posed the question, it seems like you might find it surprising?
ETA sorry, I know I've combined my replies to both pommymommy and gitana1 into this one reply, so hope it's not confusing. Also, I know there's a way to tag, if that's the correct term, another user's name within a post, so that they will see it, but I don't know how to do that. Or I would.
I agree, they should indict him on murder charges immediately because her supporters want it.HAPPENING @ 12:30P, the attorney for the Manassas Park husband accused of concealing his wife’s dead body will argue for Naresh Bhatt to be released.Mamta Kafle Bhatt’s supporters sent me this statement calling for him to be held & for stronger charges.
lol. Nice try. I was annoyed that the dragged out of the house thing wasn’t supported by any evidence, but it doesn’t change anything. Whether he dragged her from the house, carried her from the house, or magically levitated her body from the house, he still removed her from the house.In the argument for Naresh Bhatt to receive bond, the defense will call out police over what they call a flawed and inconsistent investigation. They’re criticizing the Commonwealth for withholding this letter which said the detective made inaccurate statements. @wusa9
View attachment 532510
Yeah, I'm convinced he dismembered her body in the bathtub (remember those knives he purchased), placed it into trash bags, and distributed it in various dumpsters. Unfortunately, that trash would be long gone, and landfill searches would be insanely difficult. I think this is going to be a no-body murder case, which will be as close to a slam dunk as you can get for a case like that.SEP 20, 2024
Bond denied for husband accused in missing mom case
A Northern Virginia man accused of concealing his wife’s dead body as she remains missing will stay in jail for now. A judge refused his request for bond Friday. Naresh Bhatt stands charged in connection to the disappearance of Mamta Kafle Bhatt almost two months ago. Mamta Kafle Bhatt was last...www.nbcwashington.com
- One of the places NB was seen on camera disposing trash bags was an apartment complex where he would take his daughter to a babysitter. Another was a trash compactor in Falls Church.
- They also have video of NB buying rubberized gloves, knives, extra-large storage bags and cleaning supplies after Mamta disappeared.
- NB searched the internet for a diagram of a brain and “chicken farm near me,” prosecutors said.