Wow kind of creepy. I was just sitting here drinking my coffee and it came back to me that I had a dream last night that the jury delivered the verdict and had to explain their thought process.
They did convict MS of 1st in my dream and most of their reasoning was, MM, MH, AM, SS, BD, etc. all lied in their testimonies in some big ways to protect themselves so why would MS be any different. They decided he was lying in his testimony when saying he wasn't in the truck when the shooting happened.
It actually just gave me an "AHA" moment. That does actually make some sense if they go down with that train of thought. Even MS pointed out on the stand that so many others did lie. So why would he be any different??
Sorry to let you all have a glimpse into my mind. :facepalm: All, MOO.