As we all wait for a verdict we can collectively reflect back on this case.
Could JM have done anything better in presenting this case on behalf of the state?
ANSWER- maybe; but unlikely.
As pundits have complained in the past JM could have stayed out of the weeds and not pursued every tangent that the defense introduced in order to obfuscate. The jury, however, appears to have remained on course and were able to extract the essentials. This assumption is based on the quality of questions they posed.
I believe ME Horn was relatively weak. There is good reason for this.
After all, Horn, as Medical Examiner had to do hundreds of autopsies for the Phoenix police. To him, TA in June 2008 was merely another dead body. Horn pursued his usual and ordinary routine. Naturally he did NOT understand how crucial the question of wound timing would become. Also Horn in June 2008 did not realize the GSW to the frontal lobe would be a critical part of the states case. I firmly believe that in retrospect Horn could have done a much BETTER job analyzing the head wound and could have made findings about the substance of brain.
That said however, the ME presentation of evidence was sufficient to prove the states case of murder and indeed murder 1.