ynotdivein
Retired WS Staff
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2009
- Messages
- 11,425
- Reaction score
- 71
Goodness, peeps, one steps offline for 40 minutes and returns to 400 new posts? Dedicated trial watchers say WHAT!
BBM
That was actually L. Kirk Nurmi's point.
That Chris and Sky Hughes told JA and TA that Travis HAD mistreated women in the past.
Chris and Sky maintain that the context was that mistreatment = failure to commit.
And we can see what the lying torture murderess did when TA failed to commit to her.
Oh the multi tasking a mother could get done in that time frame. The reason I am so hopeful about a verdict today is the unique circumstance of the jury being allowed to ask questions. Also, most matters were went over, and over and over in this case. I do not see how there could be confusion like in Casey's case. The jury instructions seem so much more straight forward here too, and they did not have Cheney's chart. l loved the "firmly convinced' explanation and that the jury instructions literally say very few things in life can one over be one hundred percent certain of. That is not the standard, to be convinced beyond ANY doubt ( which is what Cheney's chart implied, imo ). The standard is firmly convinced. I think that is a lot easier for even the less learned of the group to get. I do think they had the weekend for soul searching, and today they are just going over things , in a perfunctory manner. I think each one of them walked in there today, ready to cast their vote.2 hours and twenty minutes left for today's deliberations...
I very distinctly heard Juan discuss the lack of blood anywhere in the house outside the master suite and how she ditched the bloody socks during closing arguments. There was no blood in the bedroom itself. He disputes the existence of the rope, but said if there had been a rope in the bedroom that she scooped up, why was there no blood on the carpet? He also brought up the lack of blood on the bottle of Clorox.That is such a great observation, I'm surprised it wasn't mentioned by the prosecution. Judging from their questions they don't miss much. Between 12 people I'm sure someone has or will bring this up. It's kind of a minor detail at this point, but just further proves the lies never end.
Just heard a great point on HLN via JVM. In regards to the "fog", there was no blood on the light switches, washer/dryer knobs, doorknobs, rental car steering wheel etc., yet she claims when she came out of her fog, her hands were covered in blood. Doesn't make sense. Hope the jury picks up on this. I want them to realize how much she has lied to them.
Even if the jury has already decided that she is guilty of 1st degree murder
They would still have decide of it is premeditated or felony or both.
No, it doesn't have to be unanimous but it would be sweet if it came back
Premeditated 12
Felony 12
I am of the believe they are just discussing the facts.
I have faith in this jury and I will continue to unless and until i hear a not guilty.
Goodness, peeps, one steps offline for 40 minutes and returns to 400 new posts? Dedicated trial watchers say WHAT!
Goodness, peeps, one steps offline for 40 minutes and returns to 400 new posts? Dedicated trial watchers say WHAT!
I read that in Arizona the jury receives wage reimbursement up to a verified $300 a day for extended trials such as this one. So they receive more than the normal $12 a day for a shorter trial.
I sat on a jury in Texas for a week and was paid $7 a day.
Right, but who did they find to come forward and say "Travis abused me" other than JA? NO ONE. Because I dont believe that they are out there.
The CA verdict made me physically sick, I couldn't eat for two days -- and that's saying something!
Goodness, peeps, one steps offline for 40 minutes and returns to 400 new posts? Dedicated trial watchers say WHAT!
Favorite quotes
A reasonable person, she is not a reasonable person, she is a liar and a killer.
"Or perhaps Washington Mutual subscribes to the law of attraction"
In a lengthy trial the jurors can apply for up to $300/per day but they have to provide proof of lost income. So if they make $100/per day working they can apply for the lost $88/per day (their lost pay minus the $12 they are receiving per day) per the AZ Jury Duty video
She did two interviews. One for Inside Edition and one for 48 hours. She was in prison garb for one of them but I can't remember for which one...I think you'll find the links for both of these interviews in the media/timeline thread or in the first or second post of each thread.Oh the multi tasking a mother could get done in that time frame. The reason I am so hopeful about a verdict today is the unique circumstance of the jury being allowed to ask questions. Also, most matters were went over, and over and over in this case. I do not see how there could be confusion like in Casey's case. The jury instructions seem so much more straight forward here too, and they did not have Cheney's chart. l loved the "firmly convinced' explanation and that the jury instructions literally say very few things in life can one over be one hundred percent certain of. That is not the standard, to be convinced beyond ANY doubt ( which is what Cheney's chart implied, imo ). The standard is firmly convinced. I think that is a lot easier for even the less learned of the group to get. I do think they had the weekend for soul searching, and today they are just going over things , in a perfunctory manner. I think each one of them walked in there today, ready to cast their vote.
I'm looking forward to Sky and Chris on Dr. Drew.
Does anyone know if that weird press conference Jodi did in the jail garb was shown to the jury? I had never seen that before today. Did I see the date on it correctly, September? Wouldn't that have been long after her Ninja story on day two? ( I haven't followed the case from jump, so forgive me, if this is elementary.) :scared::scared: