Let's hope she isn't the jury foreman. :thinking:
All MOO.
And now that the jury is deliberating, the reporters are allowed to reveal the contents of legal arguments..as opposed to us waiting impatiently in silence through them until the proceedings resumed.
I understand that LH is free to tell us of the cagey antics of Smich and how he used the information he gleaned from those legal arguments.....but she can't give us specific examples even though the jury is now sequestered......What is the difference?
She may have been staring in disgust and wonder that someone could allegedly do something so heinous
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Let's hope she isn't the jury foreman. :thinking:
All MOO.
You can rewatch it later as well. It'll be posted on their Facebook pageI can't listen and there's no point to watching if I can't hear it lol. Keep us posted on anything else!
She may have been staring in disgust and wonder that someone could allegedly do something so heinous
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
She may have been staring in disgust and wonder that someone could allegedly do something so heinous
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The insight is interesting...even just to hear the feelings of the journalists..
Ewww lets hope she is not "enamored" with DM.
Adam Carter ‏@AdamCarterCBC 4s4 seconds ago
Pillay is asking the jury be corrected on their "misapprehension" that #Bosma went to get gas.
Ann Brocklehurst...? I think you mean,instead.
You know what I find interesting about these types of trials? There is no question whatsoever that these two were involved. The question is to what extent. My point is, if after reviewing all of the evidence and climbing these decision trees over and over, the jury somehow finds them both not-guilty, it's not like LE enforcement says, "Welp...better get back to finding who really did it than!" Now in this case I don't think there is a chance that either one of them gets a not-guilty verdict but one or both could potentially get less than 1st Degree. It highlights how important the evidence and how it is presented is in the judicial process. MOO
.....Sorry, what is the Roh, roh ?Roh roh...one female juror stared at DM a lot during the trial according to Shannon Martin on the live feed.
Wow @ the wiping away of evidence was only brought out at trial. Can additional charges stem from this?
.....Sorry, what is the Roh, roh ?
I suppose, but the only evidence they have is CN's direct testimony. What would be the point?
MOO