XiolaBlueX
Member
- Joined
- May 25, 2016
- Messages
- 103
- Reaction score
- 16
The media IMO miss tweeting a lot of material, for a few reasons in my opinion 1) they are focused on the main points for a larger audience 2) I really think a lot of them would look at certain details as minutiae, which WSs for example wouldn't 3) yesterday was full of so much technical info that is really hard to explain without the use of a diagrams or something 4) perhaps most significantly, they are typically tweeting on an electronic device really quickly and trying to get the main points out (as well as limited by characters) whereas I was using a pen and notebook and trying to catch every word I could and write it down as I found so much gets left out in tweets. I think they literally don't have the time to to type out or even catch some of the Items sometimes.That's big if true, although I don't recall any of the media tweeting this. They weren't tweeting a lot during the judges summary but obviously a lot during the original testimony. I wonder if it was an error by the judge in his summary or if all the media really missed it.
Edited to add - whether the judge made an error in including that statement yesterday remains to be seen, but I know I heard it! keep in mind that IMO it isn't necessarily evidence, as what was said in his charge isn't. So maybe it was what was already argued out and tomorrow he will tell the jury to disregard as it shouldn't have been said or admissible
IMO only