The state's case is built on "maybe's" , "could have's" and "possibles".
Jason "could" have drugged CY.
CY "maybe" witnessed the murder.
It was "possible" Jason drove close to 3 hours back to Raleigh.
Or, the following which were all proven wrong:
The NTO was issued because there "could" have been injurires consistent on Jason's body of being in a struggle.
The search warrant was issued for his SUV cause 'maybe" there was blood inside.
Another search warrant was issued to see if the Young's were having "possible" financial difficulties.
Some things that are not viewed as "maybe" or "could" or "possible":
*JY's HP shoes were indeed at the crime scene and were the shoes that made the bloody shoe print - the DT admitted that.
*JY did admit to leaving his Hampton Inn room 3 times without a key card.
*JY was 30 minutes late for his next morning's appointment.
*JY was in a volatile marriage.
*JY was having a marital affair
*JY did indicate that he was in love with another woman.
*JY had a bad relationship with his mother-in-law and did NOT want her to live with them
*JY did buy $2M in life insurance against his wife's life.
*Cassidy was not harmed.
*The house at Birchleaf was not broken into.
*There was no bloody trail from the upstairs to the downstairs and out the door.
*JY was on the internet and did visit a sports website the night of 11/2/2006 just before he went to the lobby at midnight to see sports scores in the USA Today.
*JY was not known to have ever smoked a cigar
*JY was carrying a computer carrying bag (computer charger excuse)
*JY did have his phone turned off between midnight and 7:30am (or so)
*The shirt JY wore in the lobby at midnight were never seen again.
*The HP shoes were never been seen again.