VT - Suspicious deaths in Pawlet under investigation

Welcome to Websleuths!
Click to learn how to make a missing person's thread

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

Leopard

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2024
Messages
103
Reaction score
712
PAWLET, Vermont (Sunday, Sept. 15, 2024) — The Vermont State Police is investigating suspicious deaths in the Rutland County town of Pawlet.



Early Sunday morning, Sept. 15, 2024, when police received a call reporting a suspicious person. Subsequent investigation led the state police to a residence on Vermont Route 133, where troopers located the deceased victims.



This investigation is in its preliminary stages and involves members of the Vermont State Police Major Crime Unit, Bureau of Criminal Investigations, Crime Scene Search Team, Field Force Division and Victim Services Unit.



Following processing of the scene by CSST, the victims’ bodies will be brought to the Chief Medical Examiner’s Office in Burlington for autopsies to determine the cause and manner of death. Their names will be released following confirmation of identities and notification of relatives.



Initial work by detectives indicates this was an isolated event with no identified threat to the community.
Vermont State Police investigates suspicious deaths in Pawlet
 
Then police told NewsChannel 13 that the person with blood on him called 911 and gave information about dead people inside the home he was staying at. Police then responded to the home on Route 133 and began their search.

“They searched through the house. So, they did find, some deceased victims in the house,” said Trudeau.

Police confirmed Sunday night that they found three deceased bodies when they entered the home.

Trudeau said police have detained the man but have not arrested or charged him yet.

 
It sounds like multiple people called 911 at 3:45 AM. One person reported a suspicious man with blood on his clothing. Next the suspicious male calls 911 to give information about dead people inside the home he was staying at. POlice detained him and are "chatting" with him trying to get more information.

Weirdest story of the month.
 
Two of the victims have been named in the media. Brian Crossman and his wife, Erica Crossman. Brian was on the Pawlet Select Board serving a one year term.

 
Official identification of the victims is still pending from Vermont State Police (VSP), which indicated that investigators are dealing with a person of interest who is believed to be a relative of the victims. No charges or arrests had been made by noon on Monday, though VSP spokesman Adam Silverman also said there was no indication of a threat to the public.


Thank you @Leopard - this isn't what I thought it might be.

The property is a generational family farm. Brian and Erica married in June this year and had taken it over from Brian's sister to run. He was cleaning up the property and working the farm. Brian is a lineman for Green Mountain Power and as @Leopard posted, had been elected last spring to the PSB for a one year term - through March 2025. He served as a liaison to the Pawlet Highway Department and for buildings.

It's not clear in this story, did Brian still work for Green Mountain Power?
 
It happened early Sunday morning inside a home on Route 133 in Pawlet. We’re told the victims were Brian Crossman, a Pawlet select board member, his wife, Erica Crossman, and a minor child.

Troopers say they will not confirm any details about what happened until the state medical examiner completes autopsies on the victims.


I saw a picture of Erica's son on her facebook page and wondered if the third victim was him. Horrible, horrible crime.
 
The person of interest reportedly called the police on himself, and was allegedly waiting for police in blood-covered clothing at the nearby Wells Village School. He then reportedly accompanied police to the home, according to neighbors.


 
Last edited:
Vermont State Police (VSP) continued to conduct interviews Tuesday to sort through evidence and conduct interviews. Nobody has been jailed and no known charges had been filed as of early Tuesday afternoon. VSP has yet to release the identity of the victims.

The person of interest reportedly called the police on himself, and was allegedly waiting for police in blood-covered clothing at the nearby Wells Village School. He then reportedly accompanied police to the home, according to neighbors.

 
Vermont State Police (VSP) continued to conduct interviews Tuesday to sort through evidence and conduct interviews. Nobody has been jailed and no known charges had been filed as of early Tuesday afternoon. VSP has yet to release the identity of the victims.

The person of interest reportedly called the police on himself, and was allegedly waiting for police in blood-covered clothing at the nearby Wells Village School. He then reportedly accompanied police to the home, according to neighbors.

LE is being very tight-lipped about the identity of the third victim and the POI (two separate people, if you haven't read the articles). Could they both be minors?

Note we can't sleuth family so this question is rhetorical at present.
 
Some bits are starting to come out....

From the link in the quoted post:

* The couple married in June and recently bought their home.
* The 13yo boy was Erica's son from a previous relationship.
* All died by gunshot.
* The shooter is said to be a relative who called 911 after the shootings and waited at a school for LE to arrive.

jmo
 
I don't understand why nobody is in custody

Especially since we know from the article posted and quoted just upthread that:

Early reports by a local Vermont News and Media LLC affiliate said a person of interest was identified in the case - and that he was the one who made the call.

The person of interest allegedly waited in blood-covered clothing at a nearby school for cops to arrive after making the call at around 3:45 am on Sunday, according to the Bennington Banner.

Neighbors told the outlet that he then joined officers and went to the bloody scene at the picturesque home.

The Banner reported that VSP identified the person of interest as a relative of the victims.


Maybe the Banner got it wrong?

 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
166
Guests online
2,333
Total visitors
2,499

Forum statistics

Threads
605,224
Messages
18,184,306
Members
233,273
Latest member
Lisa0457
Back
Top