WA WA - Seattle, WhtFem 30-50, 159UFWA, alias 'Mary Anderson', copper IUD, breast surgery scars, Oct'96

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Patient is a virtue I am trying to work on :) No, I do honestly understand that these things can take years but I suppose I am just asking what happens if things like DNA are used up, or if you get too "stuck" in genealogical research - basically, does it always get solved? It's such a fascinating thing to think that ANY of these sorts of cases get solved, after so many years.

To start off: I’m no expert, and this is just my opinion.

Theoretically, the DNA could get used up, so that it was not possible to progress. In practice, the science keeps progressing. Things are possible today that would have seemed impossible just a few years ago.

One potential impossibility would be that records were lost and they can’t find where a person was buried. That’s happened. Or, some jurisdictions cremated their unidentified. That’s happened. Science can’t create something out of nothing.

Some genealogical situations are extremely difficult, but I don’t think there’s such a thing as being permanently stuck. At any moment someone new could add DNA that opened up new lines to research. However, as you said, patience is a virtue. The DNA Doe project recently announced an identification that they had been working on for three years—just the genealogy part.
 
To start off: I’m no expert, and this is just my opinion.

Some genealogical situations are extremely difficult, but I don’t think there’s such a thing as being permanently stuck. At any moment someone new could add DNA that opened up new lines to research. However, as you said, patience is a virtue. The DNA Doe project recently announced an identification that they had been working on for three years—just the genealogy part.

Thank you! You are more of an expert than I am.
 
I wonder where she actually lived, in part because very few American women used IUDs in 1996. Were they more popular in Canada, or does anyone here know?

Some women don't respond well to birth control pills -- migraines and stroke are among the side effects generally attributed to the hormones. Not linking, had the migraines.

A Copper 7 doesn't include the hormones, so was a solution for some women, no idea how many & Google isn't very helpful on usage numbers.

jmho ymmv lrr
 
This article is from 2006 and says Nulliparity was once a relative contraindication to using the copper IUD. However, new research and changes in product labeling have eased safety concerns. Side effects remain a major problem with copper IUD use in this population.
Copper intrauterine device use by nulliparous women: review of side effects - ScienceDirect

I hadn't thought about this related to this UID before. Back in the 90s I learned in nursing school that IUDs (especially the copper ones) should only be used in women who had previously given birth. Some of my friends (age 40s) have gotten IUDs after/in between children but when I was younger nobody I knew used them. Supposedly "Mary Anderson" had never given birth. Perhaps she had some previous pregnancy losses that would have "qualified" her for the copper IUD.
 
The copper IUD is also given to females who can’t have much hormones due to a hormone sensitive cancer, like some types of ovarian cancers, breast cancers,…

The surgery on the breasts in combination with the copper IUD made me immediately think of breastcancer, imo.

In medical situations they are also prescribed to females who did not already give birth.
 
The original IUDs were dangerous, especially the Dalkon Shield. That's why they fell out of common use until recent years.

Some women are also allergic to the copper in an IUD.

p.s. I haven't read the whole thread, but I wonder if the "breast surgery" was a reduction? That WAS a common surgery in the 1990s.
 
This article is from 2006 and says Nulliparity was once a relative contraindication to using the copper IUD. However, new research and changes in product labeling have eased safety concerns. Side effects remain a major problem with copper IUD use in this population.
Copper intrauterine device use by nulliparous women: review of side effects - ScienceDirect

I hadn't thought about this related to this UID before. Back in the 90s I learned in nursing school that IUDs (especially the copper ones) should only be used in women who had previously given birth. Some of my friends (age 40s) have gotten IUDs after/in between children but when I was younger nobody I knew used them. Supposedly "Mary Anderson" had never given birth. Perhaps she had some previous pregnancy losses that would have "qualified" her for the copper IUD.

It is dependent on the type of IUD. Many are suitable for nulliparous/ or women who had kids via csection. The 7 is suitable.
 
Has Auriana Taylor been mention as a possibility?

5'8" 250 Lbs last seen in New Mexico, April 1996.

Brown hair, brown eyes.

Good suggestion. Her age and physical description seem to fit. From her NamUs: "Her boyfriend claimed she had simply left him". It's not clear who the word "claimed" came from, but it seems to imply his story may have been less than credible, and there could have been foul play.
 
Did either of you submit the possible match?

Would there have been an automatic comparison? Does Mary Anderson have rule-outs?

'Boyfriend' does correlate to IUD, imho.

@Lilibet can you check the rule-outs for The National Missing and Unidentified Persons System (NamUs)

She is the subject of this thread, while The National Missing and Unidentified Persons System (NamUs) is suggested for comparison.

Thanks a bunch!
Sorry @Laughing. I really don’t know how to check for rule outs and I’m not up to taking on the learning curve right now. Thanks for thinking of me. :)
 
Sorry @Laughing. I really don’t know how to check for rule outs and I’m not up to taking on the learning curve right now. Thanks for thinking of me. :)
It's easy enough to do. You just have to register for an account.
The current exclusions list has only 3 names:
MP1304
Elaine Johnson
11/22/1990
Cuyahoga OH

MP20296
Sharman Carey
01/17/1996
Pierce WA

MP32573
Peggy Wilker
10/12/1986
Pierce WA

ETA Auriana Taylor has one exclusion:

UP12683
06/06/2014
Newport News VA
 
It's easy enough to do. You just have to register for an account.
The current exclusions list has only 3 names:
MP1304
Elaine Johnson
11/22/1990
Cuyahoga OH

MP20296
Sharman Carey
01/17/1996
Pierce WA

MP32573
Peggy Wilker
10/12/1986
Pierce WA

ETA Auriana Taylor has one exclusion:

UP12683
06/06/2014
Newport News VA

Thanks @Curious_in_NC. I appreciate your guidance and encouragement, but it’s just not something I can do right now. It sounds like you’re on top of it. :)
 
With the recent annoucement from Othram regarding identification of the Christmas Tree Lady (Annandale Jane Doe), it would be wonderful if we see an announcement about Mary Anderson soon. Fingers crossed - if anyone can, Othram seem to be the ones who do it.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
118
Guests online
2,221
Total visitors
2,339

Forum statistics

Threads
601,657
Messages
18,127,828
Members
231,116
Latest member
Lily89
Back
Top