Originally Posted by Cubby: I think if she would have given Sky to his daddy there would be no child support exchanged. I'm leaning toward this is all revenge on JB's part, and sadly, her children were and are being used as pawns in JB's rage against her STBX.
JMO
No. In this case, since she is apparently unemployed, and Solomon isn't, even if she had only one child and Solomon had the other, she would very likely receive child support for the one child. What she would owe Solomon for the other child would only offset what he would owe her. The only time split custody cancels out any child support payment at all is when both parties make the same amount of money.
Per LE, the last person to have seen Sky (other than Julia or little M) was on 10/23/2011. So, it stands to reason they didn't go anywhere on Halloween to trick-or-treat.
I believe City Church is Pentecostal, in which case they don't celebrate Halloween.
But, there are tons of photos of M at some sort of church harvest festival in 2010. None this year. Too busy hiding stuff, maybe.
They have a restraining order against Solomon based on Julia's FALSE accusations about him physically and sexually abusing M. I hope when all is said and done that Solomon files a lawsuit against the state of Washington for allowing his children to remain in the custody of the woman who murdered his son stating that they recognized that she was severely mentally ill but it would not affect her ability to take care of the children. Solomon tried to warn CPS about the dangers that the children might be in but they just swept it under the rug and now look at what has happened. Sky and M would both be safe in their daddy's arms growing and thriving today if the state would have taken them away from Julia from the get go.
~jmo~
I agree. But it is very hard to impact the prejudice against fathers in our court system. Also, it is almost impossible to sue a government agency. He will have little recourse for what happened here.
BTW, I saw someone comment that CPS has a restraining order against Solomon. They do not. The court issued one against him at Julia's request. Her allegations of child abuse, child sexual abuse and domestic violence were believed. Interesting that she later agreed to un-monitored visitation and even more interesting, that she requested, at a recent juvenile dependency court hearing, that custody of M go to dad, rather than having her be in foster care. Wouldn't you rather have your kid in foster care than in the custody of the man you claimed molested her?
I saw someone mention once that yes, but Julia is mentally ill, and possibly very abused. And mentally ill, abused spouses often make bad decisions when it comes to their safety and that of their kids. Well, she has an attorney who is advising her. That's the person who spoke for her. Her attorney would explain in stark black and white why such a request could be dangerous for her daughter. And I don't know any attorney that would recommend something that so refutes their client's earlier allegations, unless those allegations were untrue.
Further, Julia was obviously neither mentally ill nor abused enough not to litigate strenuously for over a year in an effort to keep him away from her kids.
This is all so sad. The more we read and uncover, the more baffled I am about how the courts and CPS found JB a fit parent.
Just remember, CPS and the courts only looked at what was presented to them. They did not have the benefit of retrospect or hundreds of sleuthers looking on-line, etc. Nevertheless, I won't let them off the hook. I think prejudice against dads and people who "look Muslim" played a huge part in their decision. I also think Julia is a really good liar and they just found her believable.
I mean, there are still people who feel he must have had something to do with this disappearance despite all the evidence pointing to her and none to him.
I don't understand why you think the dad is innocent in all of this. Something is fishy about him to me.
Well, Sky was in her custody, not his. She admitted to leaving him alone in an unlocked car on the side of the road while walking over an hour to get gas with the other child. The car was found to have gas and
no mechanical problems. She said Sky was sick and she was rushing him to the hospital, but instead of flagging down cars on their way to church that morning, or stopping at the church which she had to pass on her way to the gas station, or asking neighbors for help, or calling an ambulance when at home, she walked for over an hour to and from a gas station that would have taken her about half an hour round trip, and she states she left her sick child in an unlocked car, abandoned.
Solomon didn't say any of those things. Solomon didn't lie to the police, Julia did. Solomon didn't admit to abandoning his child. Solomon hadn't even seen his kids in 10 months when Sky went missing.
Also, Julia had just agreed, only a few days before, after a marathon mediation session, to granting him every other week visitation. Why would
he now decide to kidnap one of his kids or otherwise cause them to disappear?
Further, Solomon has fully cooperated with LE, taking two LDTs. Julia spoke to them on the first day, has refused to sit down with LE since and her attorney isn't even answering their calls anymore. She refuses to take a LDT.
Finally, Solomon has been everywhere, handing out thousands of flyers, organizing searches, speaking to the media about Sky, pleading for help, offering a reward. We have not seen Julia once and the only thing we may possibly have heard from her was a slur against the father, claiming he is a sadistic, Pakistani Muslim (even though it is well known he is Christian).
Better question I think is why would anyone think Solomon has anything to do with this at all?
It doesn't help her cause knowing that she left a 2 y/o alone on a busy road in an unlocked car for an hour, and (if we are to believe LE) that she left her 4 y/o and 2 y/o alone for "extended periods of time."
Who in the world does that? :waitasec:
See, while it
is logical to believe she really did leave those kids alone, I still have a feeling she didn't. At least not much. I still think her admission to LE that she left the kids alone was a way to explain away Sky's absence on various occasions. I may be wrong but I can see it.
Yeah. He was getting too big to eat while sitting in the sink. :crazy lady:
Bingo. Ya' know, I don't think this was a cage for him to be put in while she left him alone. I think this was pen to put him in so he wouldn't mess up her perfect house and so she could continue cleaning 11 hours per day.
In other news, I noticed a couple of comments in the last thread about the GMA piece on Julia's e-mails. Someone noted the reporter called being a Muslim a slur. I agree that is what he said. The context of the reporter's comment was: "He is not a Muslim, despite the slur." The reporter did not say, "He is not a sadistic Pakistani Muslim, despite the slur." That would have been different.
Face it. We are overwhelming prejudiced against Muslims in this country. They are viewed with suspicion and hate. Julia knows that, which is why, if the e-mails are indeed from her, she tried to label him as such, even though sleuthers found out early on that he is such a hardcore Christian that reviewers on yelp commented on his proselytizing to customers, at his shop.
But Solomon is a dark-skinned man from a Muslim country where tons of Al-Qaeda operatives have been harbored, including Osama-bin-Laden, where women are subject to honor-killings, forced to marry, where Sharia law via the Taliban runs most of the country, etc., etc. Is it any wonder CPS did not believe him but believed his blond, blue-eyed wife?