I've thought the same thing. I also wonder about holding her on custodial interference at some point. I don't know much about custodial interference, but I imagine when SM is granted custody, he will be granted custody of both children. I see no reason he will not be granted custody and I see no reason why he would be granted custody of one and not both children.
maybe gitana1 can comment on holding her on custodial intereference at some point in the future if she sees this post.
jmo
It may be hard to prove. She is claiming an abduction took place. They need proof that she hid the child and did so in order to keep him from his father.
If you look at the Gabriel Johnson case, that was very clear, because she called him and said she was never bringing Gabriel back. She taunted him. Here, there's none of that.
But, there may be a possibility. I just don't think it would work and thus, the DA won't try it. Neglect, child endangerment is a better bet.
I know they are working this case hard. They are biding their time with an arrest, because while an arrest might cause her to freak and divulge something, the opposite is also true - she may realize she is in big trouble and clam up even more.
I think of the casey anthony case. I thought they arrested her too early. I think she would have talked even more than she did when they interviewed her. There were discrepancies in her statements that they failed to explore, like when she said she dropped Caylee of before work, yet she admitted to not having a job. I would have liked them to ask more questions about that and other things. And they could have watched what she did, obtained more info, etc.
They lose nothing by waiting here, unless she kills herself. She may lead them to evidence. She may begin to answer a few more questions in an effort to look like she is cooperating and has nothing to hide. But, if she continues to remain silent, as the last reports indicate, (her attorney not answering calls), then they may not wait much longer.
I mentioned this before a few threads back . . . but I am astonished at the lack of furniture in JB's home! Not sure if that is a result of the financial problems they had or more of an OCD issue of JB's. Not having a kitchen table or chairs, no dresser, no bedroom furniture, no cribs, no high chair (with the exception of the little seat hanging on the counter), etc., makes me believe even more that she would feed Sky in the sink. I bathed my infants in the sink @ their Grandmother's when we would spend the night there. It was more of an opportunity for Grandma to bathe the babies, because it was easier for them not to have to bend over a tub.
I think it was an OCD issue. It is so much easier to keep a home clean when there is not much stuff in it.