For those of you concerned about Lyle's Wikipedia article, I'm thankful for your effort, but by posting a link to the discussion and asking others to give votes to keep the article isn't going to help as much. As a Wikipedia editor for the past six years (and the author of the article) the deletion process has frustrated me to a severe degree, but the page won't be kept just by interpreting the number of votes for keeping the page. In order to have the article stay, we need secondary news sources. If any of you can find some online or that can scan copies and post them, the page doesn't quite fulfill the standards for sources, which is the main argument the opposing side has against the page.