hot cawfeee
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2013
- Messages
- 2,269
- Reaction score
- 1,458
I still laugh at Spitzer making his "lady" take cheap travel for their rendezvous...….cheap *advertiser censored*...that's what got you caught !!!!!!!
IT IS ALL A PILE OF BULLSH!T created by incompetents that have NO idea how to fix the system. HUGE story in Newsday Online, today to be followed up in the print editions for tomorrow and Wednesday.
I went to Sini's office and was turned away. I confronted him a couple of months ago at a Town Hall Meeting and all I got was bullsh!t. He knows who I am because when he was the police commissioner running for DA he gave me his card and said we should have lunch.
VERY SIMPLE, but they won't do it: EVERY FRIGGEN CASE that Spota, Burke, Prudenti, and a host of others had ANYTHING TO DO WITH should be examined no matter how long it takes !
Burke is a convicted criminal that was convicted for essentially was lying. Spota will join him soon. Jim Hickey might be better known as CD#1 for the Spota case is right in the middle.
The main witness in the son in law case was a career criminal named Joe Careccia who lived only 4 doors away from Jim Burke from 1998 -2002.
Mr. Sini apparently doesn't find a need to take a look at this case. Nobody wants money if the conviction is reversed - I just want the fellow's name cleared.
The story in Newsday is nothing more than a PR gambit promoting Sini for whatever it is he wants to do.
IT IS ALL A PILE OF BULLSH!T created by incompetents that have NO idea how to fix the system. HUGE story in Newsday Online, today to be followed up in the print editions for tomorrow and Wednesday.
I went to Sini's office and was turned away. I confronted him a couple of months ago at a Town Hall Meeting and all I got was bullsh!t. He knows who I am because when he was the police commissioner running for DA he gave me his card and said we should have lunch.
VERY SIMPLE, but they won't do it: EVERY FRIGGEN CASE that Spota, Burke, Prudenti, and a host of others had ANYTHING TO DO WITH should be examined no matter how long it takes !
Burke is a convicted criminal that was convicted for essentially was lying. Spota will join him soon. Jim Hickey might be better known as CD#1 for the Spota case is right in the middle.
The main witness in the son in law case was a career criminal named Joe Careccia who lived only 4 doors away from Jim Burke from 1998 -2002.
Mr. Sini apparently doesn't find a need to take a look at this case. Nobody wants money if the conviction is reversed - I just want the fellow's name cleared.
The story in Newsday is nothing more than a PR gambit promoting Sini for whatever it is he wants to do.
.....continued..... was also posting from the SCPD P.A.L. office, and in the same building he posted frwitm the union office of District Attorney's Investigators.
PAL stands for Police Athletic League. And what does PAL do? They deal with children. It might be a coincidence but when that bag was stolen out of Burke's car with sex toys etc. it was a PAL gym bag. The DAI union office was run mostly by Investigators from Spota's office. Burke was the Chief Investigator for Spota at the time.
There came a time Spota had a fight with CE Steve Levy. Levy didn't think PAL should have a staff of working cops being taken off of patrol. I think Levy's objections were more than reasonable: replace cops with lesser paid civilians. Spota thought otherwise. He was the DA so the question was: Why was he getting so involved in something that had nothing to do with him? Hmmm.
Not suggesting there was something to indict other than one could indict a 'ham sandwich'. I am sure it was what he was referring to.
Raising all that money without breaking some law or rule is impossible.
If you were referring to Steve Levy I have to say the people of Suffolk County were getting a square a deal as possible.
NO.
If you have a permit you can. But I wouldn't recommend you carry a pistol on your hip that is viewable to the public.
Well, there shouldn't be anything to indict. I know you can be maliciously prosecuted and entrapped. Maybe that is what he was referring to.
Trust me, I am more than aware of dirty underhanded police corruption and how they operate when they are covering up misconduct. I know how good and beneficial the system can be and also how bad it can be. I think the main drawback for me right now is finding a place where I don't have to worry about corruption. I wanted to protect people and help people not target people unfairly and lock up or harass innocent people. I don't want to be involved in an OIS as a witness that's unjustified and have a department not take ownership of it and start lying about it and attacking the victim and the family. I would be completely humiliated by working for a department like that and with officers like that.
10-4REFERRING to the last line in the above post: It didn't seem to bother PC Hart and DA Sini one wit. IMO, both are there because they are basically very decent people that put on a good show of respectability.
I have a lot of work before me if I respond adequately to your post. I worked for a well known NYC official who was the long time Honorary President of PAL. His main contribution was his name he gave to the organization. Through him PAL was able to raise millions of dollars thru the years. He did that with fund raisers that packed the people to the rafters. I personally went to three Carnige Hall Frank Sinatra concerts. Had a gala even in a hotel event for the Bee Gees. Was at local movie set when they filmed the Tarvolta dance movie. Several others that raised a ton of money.
Spota and Levy got into a public fight over how the PAL should be staffed. Spota had no standing in such an argument. When Levy was asked by a newspaper if he was going to fight Spota, Levy said, " You don't start a fight with a guy that can indict you.' I mentioned that to him and for some reason he denied it. Trust me he said it. there are things you just don't forget.
Why not.Hawkshaw, you are only one person and have kept the corruption in the public eye, any way you could,
are you available in the month's after Spota's sentencing to talk to producers for a new
Netflix series on the LISK case and the corruption of SC? It will be a different format than
shows already done.