Cross Creek
Member
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2011
- Messages
- 261
- Reaction score
- 7
I can't say or I would get a time out. I still feel sick to my stomach about it
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
BBM
I couldn't disagree more. I have no obligation to respect their decision if I believe they did not use common sense or give adequate weight to evidence vs. accusations. Respect is earned and they did nothing to earn mine.
Ooh, I'm not a juror, but I can answer that one! <pick me pick me!>
Because they had VIDEO of her lying to police, that's why!
So, if only the state had produced VIDEO of ICA killing Caylee, then they would've voted guilty, of course! It's all the state's fault for not catching the murder on video!
Why is that? Simply I just want to know why? Too busy cashing in?
I refuse to respect their decision ever......I saw where a sign was put up in Pinnelas County tonight awaitng the jurors return home...... It was lit up and read...."What the F...Have You Done"... My sentiments exactly..JMHO
Is cindy home getting ICA's room ready? Maybe she can consult some jurors on decorating ideas. May I suggest Black walls with iridescent skulls?
Agree. I'm tired of being told to respect juries in these cases. I didn't respect OJ's jury and I don't respect this one, either. Number one, how do you go through that much evidence in about a day? Wait...they didn't. Two, when you saw those pics of her half-naked laughing it up and dancing for 31 days did you find it odd she seemed so care-free and happy even though she'd just lost the daughter you thought she was such a good mother to? Three, every time the alternate juror speaks he causes me to believe more and the jurors had talked about this case during the trial and all made up their minds early on.
I'm a paralegal. I used to work for defense attorneys. Part of my job was being the "devil's advocate" and poking holes in their theories and acting like a juror who desperately wanted to find their client guilty. I'm fully capable of seeing a trial warts and all from both sides. I like Jeff Ashton, but I wondered early on if he wasn't rubbing the jury wrong. I saw how he could. I could see how some of the scientific evidence could be iffy or explained away. I knew the Anthony clan was such a mess they could wonder if they were all lying. I could see there was a problem with the motive. The thing is, they don't need to prove motive, and the alternate juror has already said they took that into consideration.
So, they took into consideration something they were not supposed to; I believe they were talking about the case early on; they didn't take notes very often; they dismissed every single witness who smelled death in the car (the alternate juror said he had a hard time believing Caylee was in that car. I find that ludicrous to the nth degree); they knew she was a liar who lied to police, found her guilty of that, but gave her a pass on everything else; and "deliberated" a ridiculously short time for such a lengthy trial. I would have some respect if they had seemed to give it any thought at all.
I don't respect these people in the slightest.
I refuse to respect their decision ever......I saw where a sign was put up in Pinnelas County tonight awaitng the jurors return home...... It was lit up and read...."What the F...Have You Done"... My sentiments exactly..JMHO
I may be breaking forum etiquette here by being off topic, BUT ...
I knew the verdict when I heard Judge Perry's breathing as he reviewed the forms.
*#{%}\!|!>,|£|£,@/&$-@@@!?(]+=[_|\!!!!!!!
Oh and
/)(&-@$;!?'/)&@"<|>%^*+[_<~£$&@-/@!?.,"!!!!!!!!
I can't post it here. I would get banned.