MaxManning
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2015
- Messages
- 1,438
- Reaction score
- 8
I don't have the information to make determinations of competence or not. If there is evidence that will help prove the assertion that SA was framed or railroaded or whatever adjective, then it should be explored and fully vetted, yes. I'm all for thorough investigations, an honest exploration of the evidence and not making assumptions on either side.
So, if the bullet is found 6 months later in a garage that was searched already, are you at all suspicious ?
They weren't still investigating/searching that garage, they were done searching that garage for many months.
So if there was a bullet there, would competent people find that bullet and fragment that are laying out on the floor ? And casings that are out in the open.
be honest.
that's all.
If there is information that explains it all, then why wouldn't we all accept that ? But where is it ? I don't see it.
So, I'm suspicious still