oceanblueeyes
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2004
- Messages
- 26,446
- Reaction score
- 43,719
If it was murder then it was someone who thought Rebecca had intentionally with malice severely harmed Max and then threw him over the banister immediately afterward trying to cover up her crime.
That is the only thing that makes sense to me as a possible motive for a homicide.
You killed him so therefore I will kill you......type of motive. Although retaliation kills are rather rare and are usually done by rival drug gangs.
I am not sure about Means and Opportunity. She was alone at the mansion and everything used was found there and not brought in. So anyone could have had access to her and had the means and opportunity to gather up the items used from inside the mansion.
I think Dina and Jonah can prove they were either at the hospital with Max or was nearby at Ronald McDonald house which I feel uses key cards for security measures and also has surveillance cameras in place too. I imagine they get children who are in crisis-critical who have been severely abused by maybe one of the parents and the cameras is to make sure nothing erupts among family members, imo.
So that leaves Adam. I have never read that he has been in trouble before this. In fact I got the impression he didn't even see his brother that often so I don't know why he would do this to Rebecca and have no evidence that he didn't like her or was blaming her for Max' death and even so .........that doesn't mean for certain he would risk ruining his life to hurt Rebecca.
The only way I can see it happening if one of them paid a hit man but then that just makes no sense to me either. Contacts would have to be made and the plan setup. IMO, they wouldn't have done it at the mansion to cast immediate suspicions on the involved parties and they would have done it simpler and got in and out quickly.
So while some may have had means, motive, and opportunity... I really don't have a clue who it could be if indeed Rebecca's death was really a homicide.
IMO
That is the only thing that makes sense to me as a possible motive for a homicide.
You killed him so therefore I will kill you......type of motive. Although retaliation kills are rather rare and are usually done by rival drug gangs.
I am not sure about Means and Opportunity. She was alone at the mansion and everything used was found there and not brought in. So anyone could have had access to her and had the means and opportunity to gather up the items used from inside the mansion.
I think Dina and Jonah can prove they were either at the hospital with Max or was nearby at Ronald McDonald house which I feel uses key cards for security measures and also has surveillance cameras in place too. I imagine they get children who are in crisis-critical who have been severely abused by maybe one of the parents and the cameras is to make sure nothing erupts among family members, imo.
So that leaves Adam. I have never read that he has been in trouble before this. In fact I got the impression he didn't even see his brother that often so I don't know why he would do this to Rebecca and have no evidence that he didn't like her or was blaming her for Max' death and even so .........that doesn't mean for certain he would risk ruining his life to hurt Rebecca.
The only way I can see it happening if one of them paid a hit man but then that just makes no sense to me either. Contacts would have to be made and the plan setup. IMO, they wouldn't have done it at the mansion to cast immediate suspicions on the involved parties and they would have done it simpler and got in and out quickly.
So while some may have had means, motive, and opportunity... I really don't have a clue who it could be if indeed Rebecca's death was really a homicide.
IMO