I would think the complement to JA's book would be one by JB? ... although that would be as reliable as one from FCA herself.
To me, CM was very shaky on the facts of the case and that's why he let JB take the lead so much. CM had a role both as a figurehead as well as an experienced aid in specific areas. That's all.
Far better to read the DT insider strategy from CM's assistant, I cannot recall her name but she was front and center -- unless she is ghost writing CM's book? I might read that book but not one from CM or JB.
I tend to give credit to those who have been in a profession for years, a little quicker than the relative newbies to a profession. JB as compared experience wise to CM is a newbie, while CM is the wiley old veteran, that has been practicing in Florida for many years. He and HHBP obviously have history together, and there was a mutual respect between them.
LF, CM's aide, may very well assist CM in writing this book. His writing will not reflect the mumbling in his speech. Nor will it reflect his seeming difficulty in hearing.
I am going to guess he won't be writing with a southern drawl, except occasionally when he wants to make light of his southern drawl.
A book by JB would be interesting, but would not be as articulate or as legally accurate as book by CM has the potential of being.
I will be disappointed in this book by CM, if all he does in the book is rant and rave about how unfair the media treated the DT. I am hoping that there are chapters on the legal gameplaying both sides were engaged in, and how they worked around the legal minefields. I'm interested in the behind the scenes lawyering that went on, and the laws they were using while playing these games.
Same goes for JA's book. I really don't want to read about how wrong the jury was, and how he doesn't understand how the jury could have been so wrong. I do want to read about how he legally outplayed the defense team, and if there were any instances where they outplayed him. The behind the scenes legal stuff is what I am interested in, and I want to read from both points of view, the prosecution and the defense. I would not expect to hear the defense's side of the coin from a book by JA.
As always, my entire post is my opinion only.