Well assuming Misskelley was telling the truth regarding who mutilated Christopher Byers throughout his many confessions, that pegs Baldwin as quite crazy in his own right, just not overtly so to anywhere near the extent which earned Echols his extensively documented mental heath history.
On a side note, while I find the wild finger pointing at Terry Hobbs as revolting as that which was previously directed at Mark Byers, at least I can take solace in seeing so many supporters of the convicted aren't buying into the defense's completely unsubstantiated claims of animal predation and no knifes.
The claims aren't unsubstantiated-- they are backed by the professional opinions of 6 or 7 independent, well-known, published certified medical examiners. And they happen to all agree that it was animal predation. Put that against one opinion by the "medical examiner" of Crittenden County, Arkansas, who wasn't able to earn his certification. Oh, and throw in there that Arkansas has a strange law that makes a medical examiner an arm of the prosecution, who answers to the government.
Now.... If you are a juror, you can weigh the expertise of the expert witnesses' testimony to determine who is most credible. It seems fairly obvious who is the most credible :banghead: